FED finalized the guidance on effectiveness of the Board of Directors and released the results of its review of 27 Supervision and Regulation and Consumer Affairs letters (SR Letters) that contain guidance on the roles and responsibilities for Boards of Directors of holding companies. Post review, FED decided to revise twelve SR Letters, make inactive nine SR Letters, and retain six SR letters without change. The supervisory guidance on Board effectiveness applies to all domestic bank holding companies and domestic savings and loan holding companies with consolidated assets of USD 100 billion or more. The guidance also applies to systemically important nonbank financial companies designated by the Financial Stability Oversight Council for supervision by FED.
The supervisory guidance on the effectiveness of Board of Directors adopts a principles-based approach to describe attributes of effective boards and provides illustrative examples of effective practices. The guidance notes that an effective board:
- oversees the development of strategy and reviews, approves, and periodically monitors the firm's strategy and risk appetite.
- directs senior management to provide directors with information that is sufficient in scope, detail, and analysis to enable the board to make sound, well-informed decisions and consider potential risks.
- oversees and holds senior management accountable for effectively implementing the firm's strategy, consistent with its risk appetite, while maintaining an effective risk management framework and system of internal controls.
- assesses and supports—through its risk and audit committees—the stature and independence of the firm's independent risk management and internal audit functions.
- considers whether the Board composition, governance structure, and practices support the firm's safety and soundness and promote compliance with laws and regulations (based on factors such as the firm's asset size, complexity, scope of operations, risk profile, and other changes that occur over time).
Firms subject to the large financial institution rating system are assigned three component ratings: Capital Planning and Positions, Liquidity Risk Management and Positions, and Governance and Controls. The supervisory assessment of Board effectiveness is one of the elements within the Governance and Controls component rating. As the board effectiveness guidance builds on the principles set forth in the large financial institution ratings framework, FED intends to use the board effectiveness guidance in informing its assessment of the governance and controls at all firms subject to the large financial institution rating system.
- Notification on Guidance
- Guidance (PDF)
- Review of Supervisory Expectations
- Changes to Supervisory Letters (PDF)
Keywords: Americas, US, Banking, Governance, Large Banks, Guidance, Operational Risk, FED
Previous ArticleEU Rule Amends Requirement for European Single Electronic Format
APRA issued a letter on the loss-absorbing capacity (LAC) requirements for domestic systemically important banks (D-SIBs) and published a discussion paper, along with the proposed the prudential standards on financial contingency planning (CPS 190) and resolution planning (CPS 900).
The European Commission (EC) launched a call for evidence, until March 18, 2022, as part of a comprehensive review of the macro-prudential rules for the banking sector under the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR) and Directive (CRD IV).
The Financial Stability Board (FSB) published a report that sets out good practices for crisis management groups.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) found that Heritage Bank Limited had incorrectly reported capital because of weaknesses in operational risk and compliance frameworks, although the bank did not breach minimum prudential capital ratios at any point and remains well-capitalized.
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) released the annual report for 2020-2021.
Through a letter addressed to the banking sector entities, the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) announced deferral of the domestic implementation of the final Basel III reforms from the first to the second quarter of 2023.
EIOPA recently published a letter in which EC is informing the European Parliament and Council that it could not adopt the set of draft regulatory technical standards for disclosures under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) within the stipulated three-month period, given their length and technical detail.
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) published the third in a series of policy statements that set out rules to introduce the UK Investment Firm Prudential Regime (IFPR), which will take effect on January 01, 2022.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published, along with a summary of its response to the consultation feedback, an information paper that summarizes the finalized capital framework that is in line with the internationally agreed Basel III requirements for banks.
The Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) issued a consultative report focusing on access to central counterparty (CCP) clearing and client-position portability.