BIS published a working paper that presents a new approach to measuring variability in the risk-weighted assets (RWAs) of banks. The approach presented in the paper compares a market-implied estimate of a bank's risk profile with the bank's own estimate. This variability ratio provides an external benchmark to assess the degree of difference in modeled capital requirements across banks and over time. It also provides a quantitative measure to assess the extent to which this difference has narrowed as a result of the Basel III reforms.
The global financial crisis highlighted a number of weaknesses in the regulatory framework, including concerns about excessive variability in bank RWAs stemming from their use of internal models. The Basel III reforms that were finalized in 2017 by BCBS seek to reduce this excessive RWA variability. This paper develops a novel approach to measuring RWA variability—the variability ratio—by comparing a market-implied measure of RWAs with reported regulatory RWAs of banks. Using a panel data set comprising a large sample of internationally active banks during 2001-2016, the study found that there was a wide degree of RWA variability among banks and that the market-implied RWA estimates were persistently higher than regulatory RWAs. Regulatory RWAs are roughly half the level of the market-implied RWAs.
Regarding determinants of this variability, the authors have found a strong and statistically significant association between the measure of RWA variability and the share of opaque assets held by banks (example derivatives); the degree to which a bank is capital constrained; and the jurisdiction-specific factors. The results suggest that market participants may be applying an opaqueness premium for banks that hold highly complex instruments and that the incentive for banks to game their internal models is particularly acute for capital constrained banks. The results also point to jurisdiction-specific factors which could also explain RWA variability. The results point out that RWA variability directly affects banks’ own profitability through higher funding costs. Finally, it was found that the 2017 Basel III reforms, and in particular the output floor, help reduce RWA variability, with greater reductions in variability observed for higher calibrations of the floor.
Related Link: Working Paper
Keywords: International, Banking, Basel III, Capital Requirements, Risk-Weighted Assets, Variability Ratio, Output Floor, Research, BIS
Previous ArticleFINMA Assesses Recovery and Emergency Plans of Large Swiss Banks
BoE published a statistical notice (Notice 2020/9) explaining the approach for treatment of payment holidays on the profit and loss return or Form PL.
BoE updated the known issues document for the statistical reporting Forms AS and FV.
FED announced individual capital requirements for 34 large banks and these requirements go into effect on October 01, 2020.
SRB published a set of documents to give operational guidance to banks on implementation of the bail-in tool.
BIS published an update on the G20 TechSprint Initiative, which was launched in April 2020 and aims to highlight the potential for technologies to resolve regulatory compliance (regtech) and supervisory (suptech) challenges.
OSFI published a letter that provides an update on the milestones for the implementation of the IFRS 17 standard on insurance contracts.
EBA updated the report on the implementation of selected COVID-19 policies.
The Financial Stability Institute (FSI) of BIS published a brief note that examines the supervisory challenges associated with certain temporary regulatory relief measures introduced by BCBS and prudential authorities in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
BCBS is consulting on the principles for operational resilience and the revisions to the principles for sound management of operational risk for banks.
BoE updated the reporting template for Form ER as well as the Form ER definitions, which contain guidance on the methodology to be used in calculating annualized interest rates.