EIOPA published a supervisory statement on the impact of the ultra-low or negative interest rate environment on the insurance sector in EU. The statement starts by analyzing the impact of ultra-low or negative yields on the European insurance sector, provides an overview of the supervisory responses and the reactions of undertakings to such an environment, and provides a set of recommendations to mitigate the impact of the ultra-low or negative interest rate environment. This statement should be read along with the background note of EIOPA, which focuses on the supervisory powers and measures and the reactions of companies to the low interest rate environment.
The statement highlights that the ultra-low or negative interest rate environment constitutes one of the most important sources of systemic risk for insurers for the coming years. Such an environment has an impact on both asset and liability sides of the balance sheet, affecting the solvency position and profitability of undertakings. The aim of the supervisory statement is to raise awareness and ensure that the insurance sector continues to be financially resilient. The statement also seeks to inform consumers and policyholders about supervisory measures and actions being taken to protect their interest. EIOPA encourages the national supervisory authorities and the undertakings in EU to continue taking actions to mitigate the impact of the ultra-low or negative interest rate environment on the EU insurance sector.
EIOPA recommends that, in the medium-to-long-term, the national supervisory authorities should identify whether there are any tools or powers missing in their current toolkit. Where a gap is identified, the national authorities should request the missing powers. In the short-term, however, EIOPA recommends that:
- National supervisory authorities should intensify the monitoring and supervision of insurers identified as facing greater exposure to the low interest rate environment;
- National supervisory authorities should engage in dialog with undertakings to explore actions they could take to improve their financial resilience
- Within the context of improving financial resilience and in particular sound capital planning, undertakings should exercise caution in distributing dividends and national supervisory authorities should consider whether it is necessary to restrict the distribution of dividends;
- National supervisory authorities and undertakings should pay special attention on preemptive recovery and resolution planning to reduce the likelihood and impact of insurance failures
- National supervisory authorities should broaden the analysis of the low interest rate environment and also consider the potential build-up of systemic risk.
The content of this document is aligned and should be read in conjunction with the policy proposals contained in the Consultation Paper on the Opinion on the 2020 Review of Solvency II.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Insurance, Interest Rate Risk, Systemic Risk, Solvency II, Recovery and Resolution Planning, Asset and Liability Management, ALM, EIOPA
APRA issued a letter on the loss-absorbing capacity (LAC) requirements for domestic systemically important banks (D-SIBs) and published a discussion paper, along with the proposed the prudential standards on financial contingency planning (CPS 190) and resolution planning (CPS 900).
The European Commission (EC) launched a call for evidence, until March 18, 2022, as part of a comprehensive review of the macro-prudential rules for the banking sector under the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR) and Directive (CRD IV).
The Financial Stability Board (FSB) published a report that sets out good practices for crisis management groups.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) found that Heritage Bank Limited had incorrectly reported capital because of weaknesses in operational risk and compliance frameworks, although the bank did not breach minimum prudential capital ratios at any point and remains well-capitalized.
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) released the annual report for 2020-2021.
Through a letter addressed to the banking sector entities, the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) announced deferral of the domestic implementation of the final Basel III reforms from the first to the second quarter of 2023.
EIOPA recently published a letter in which EC is informing the European Parliament and Council that it could not adopt the set of draft regulatory technical standards for disclosures under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) within the stipulated three-month period, given their length and technical detail.
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) published the third in a series of policy statements that set out rules to introduce the UK Investment Firm Prudential Regime (IFPR), which will take effect on January 01, 2022.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published, along with a summary of its response to the consultation feedback, an information paper that summarizes the finalized capital framework that is in line with the internationally agreed Basel III requirements for banks.
The Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) issued a consultative report focusing on access to central counterparty (CCP) clearing and client-position portability.