Featured Product

    FED Paper Examines Impact of Governance Structures on CCyB Decisions

    February 18, 2020

    FED published a paper that examines whether governance structures for macro-prudential policies affect decisions to implement Basel III macro-prudential capital buffers. The paper presents empirical evidence that stronger governance for macro-prudential policies significantly increases the probability of using the countercyclical capital buffer (CCyB). The analysis also shows that stronger governance increases the sensitivity of this probability to credit growth, consistent with taking actions to mitigate financial stability risks.

    The study finds that the probabilities of using CCyB are higher in countries that have financial stability committees with stronger governance mechanisms and fewer agencies, which reduces coordination problems. The probability of the use of CCyB by a country is even higher when financial stability committees or ministry of finance have direct authority to set the CCyB; this might be because setting the CCyB involves establishing a new macro-financial analytical process to regularly assess systemic risks and allows these new entities to influence the traditional process of writing rules. The study finds that only some of the new multi-agency committees—specifically, those with tools or those with fewer member agencies—are consistent with a functional delegation motive. While countries may prefer to create these committees mainly for improved communication, large committees or those with weak governance mechanisms may actually hinder effective decision-making.

    The study also shows that the institutional arrangements and establishing clear responsibilities for new tools have a measurable effect on decisions. New authorities with tools and accountability can have a significant effect on using the CCyB. The study does not find that central banks with direct powers are more likely than independent bank regulators to use the CCyB or increase the minimum systemically important bank surcharge, although central banks are involved in multiple ways in these decisions. For the CCyB, they are the direct authority in 34 countries (wherever they are also the prudential regulator) and they make formal recommendations in five more countries. However, the study does not find a distinct effect for the central bank from the prudential regulator for any of the macro-prudential capital buffer decisions.

     

    Related Link: Paper

     

    Keywords: Americas, US, Banking, CCyB, Basel III, Systemic Risk, Macro-Prudential Policy, Financial Stability, FED

    Featured Experts
    Related Articles
    News

    HKMA Announces Liquidity Measures in Response to COVID-19 Outbreak

    HKMA issued a circular on liquidity measures that HKMA has taken or plans to take in response to COVID-19 outbreak.

    April 03, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BaFin Lowers Countercyclical Capital Buffer Amid COVID-19 Outbreak

    BaFin published a general order to lower the countercyclical capital buffer (CCyB) from 0.25% to 0% as of April 01, 2020.

    April 03, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    ESMA Updates Risk Assessment in Light of COVID-19

    ESMA updated its risk assessment to account for the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.

    April 02, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FSB Outlines and Reprioritizes Its Work to Address COVID-19 Risks

    FSB published a statement that outlines its work toward addressing the financial stability risks posed by COVID-19, along with the reprioritization of its work program for 2020.

    April 02, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EIOPA Announces Measures to Address the Impact of COVID-19

    Due to the outbreak of COVID-19, EIOPA is re-prioritizing and alleviating the burden by extending the deadlines or delaying projects where input from national competent authorities and/or industry is foreseen.

    April 02, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EBA Guidelines on Use of Payment Moratoria to Address Liquidity Issues

    EBA published detailed guidance on the treatment of legislative and non-legislative moratoria on loan repayments to be applied before June 30, 2020, in light of the COVID-19 crisis.

    April 02, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    PRA Outlines Approach to Reporting and Disclosures Amid COVID-19

    PRA published a statement to outline its approach to regulatory reporting and Pillar 3 disclosures for UK banks, building societies, designated investment firms, and credit unions.

    April 02, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    PRA Finalizes Certain Modeling Issues for Solvency II Internal Models

    PRA published a statement (PS9/20) that sets out the final policy on modeling of income-producing real estate loans and internal credit assessment for illiquid, unrated assets within the Solvency II internal models.

    April 02, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EIOPA Issues Statement on Mitigating Impact of COVID-19 Outbreak

    EIOPA issued a statement to insurers and intermediaries, urging them to take steps to mitigate the impact of COVID-19 on consumers.

    April 01, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    APRA on Changes to Reporting Obligations for Banks Due to COVID-19

    APRA, in collaboration with the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) and the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS), published a letter outlining temporary changes in reporting obligations for authorized deposit-taking institutions and registered financial corporations, in response to COVID-19.

    April 01, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 4936