Featured Product

    FED Paper Examines Impact of Governance Structures on CCyB Decisions

    February 18, 2020

    FED published a paper that examines whether governance structures for macro-prudential policies affect decisions to implement Basel III macro-prudential capital buffers. The paper presents empirical evidence that stronger governance for macro-prudential policies significantly increases the probability of using the countercyclical capital buffer (CCyB). The analysis also shows that stronger governance increases the sensitivity of this probability to credit growth, consistent with taking actions to mitigate financial stability risks.

    The study finds that the probabilities of using CCyB are higher in countries that have financial stability committees with stronger governance mechanisms and fewer agencies, which reduces coordination problems. The probability of the use of CCyB by a country is even higher when financial stability committees or ministry of finance have direct authority to set the CCyB; this might be because setting the CCyB involves establishing a new macro-financial analytical process to regularly assess systemic risks and allows these new entities to influence the traditional process of writing rules. The study finds that only some of the new multi-agency committees—specifically, those with tools or those with fewer member agencies—are consistent with a functional delegation motive. While countries may prefer to create these committees mainly for improved communication, large committees or those with weak governance mechanisms may actually hinder effective decision-making.

    The study also shows that the institutional arrangements and establishing clear responsibilities for new tools have a measurable effect on decisions. New authorities with tools and accountability can have a significant effect on using the CCyB. The study does not find that central banks with direct powers are more likely than independent bank regulators to use the CCyB or increase the minimum systemically important bank surcharge, although central banks are involved in multiple ways in these decisions. For the CCyB, they are the direct authority in 34 countries (wherever they are also the prudential regulator) and they make formal recommendations in five more countries. However, the study does not find a distinct effect for the central bank from the prudential regulator for any of the macro-prudential capital buffer decisions.

     

    Related Link: Paper

     

    Keywords: Americas, US, Banking, CCyB, Basel III, Systemic Risk, Macro-Prudential Policy, Financial Stability, FED

    Featured Experts
    Related Articles
    News

    EU Amends CRD4 and CRD5 as Part of Capital Markets Recovery Package

    EU published Directive 2021/338, which amends the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID) II and the Capital Requirements Directives (CRD 4 and 5) to facilitate recovery from the COVID-19 crisis.

    February 26, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EU Committee Recommends Systemic Risk Buffer of 4.5% in Norway

    The Standing Committee of the European Free Trade Association (EFTA) recommended that a systemic risk buffer level of 4.5% for domestic exposures can be considered appropriate for addressing the identified systemic risks to the stability of the financial system in Norway.

    February 25, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    PRA Clarifies Approach to Onshoring of Credit Risk Rules for UK Banks

    In a recent statement, PRA clarified its approach to the application of certain EU regulatory technical standards and EBA guidelines on standardized and internal ratings-based approaches to credit risk, following the end of the Brexit transition.

    February 25, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FSB Sets Out Work Priorities for 2021

    In a recently published letter addressed to the G20 finance ministers and central bank governors, the FSB Chair Randal K. Quarles has set out the key FSB priorities for 2021.

    February 25, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EU Publishes Corrigendum to Revised Capital Requirements Regulation

    EU published, in the Official Journal of the European Union, a corrigendum to the revised Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR2 or Regulation 2019/876).

    February 25, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    ESAs Issue Statement on Application of Sustainability Disclosures Rule

    ESAs published a joint supervisory statement on the effective and consistent application and on national supervision of the regulation on sustainability-related disclosures in the financial services sector (SFDR).

    February 25, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EC Consults on Crisis Management and Deposit Insurance Frameworks

    EC published a public consultation on the review of crisis management and deposit insurance frameworks in EU.

    February 25, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    HKMA Enhances Loan Guarantee Scheme to Alleviate Pressure on SMEs

    HKMA announced that enhancements will be made to the Special 100% Loan Guarantee of the SME Financing Guarantee Scheme (SFGS) and the application period will be extended to December 31, 2021.

    February 24, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EBA Proposes Standards for Supervisory Cooperation Under IFD

    EBA launched consultations on the regulatory and implementing technical standards on cooperation and information exchange between competent authorities involved in prudential supervision of investment firms.

    February 24, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BoE Addresses Banks in Scope of First Resolvability Assessment

    BoE issued a letter to the CEOs of eight major UK banks that are in scope of the first Resolvability Assessment Framework (RAF) reporting and disclosure cycle.

    February 24, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 6629