FSB Report Examines Financial Stability Implications of Fintech
FSB published a report that assesses fintech-related market developments and their potential implications for financial stability. The report assesses the fintech landscape, including market concentration of third-party providers, and provides case studies on fintech credit and payments services. The report offers an overall conclusion on the financial stability implications of fintech developments, along with the possible actions from FSB, BCBS, and IOSCO. Additionally, the Annexes (2,3, and 4) to the report examine fintech developments in China.
The report establishes that technological innovation holds great promise for the provision of financial services, with the potential to increase market access, the range of product offerings, and convenience, while lowering costs to clients. New entrants into the financial services space, including fintech firms and large, established technology companies (bigtech), could materially alter the universe of financial services providers. Greater competition and diversity in lending, payments, insurance, trading, and other areas of financial services can create a more efficient and resilient financial system. However, heightened competition could also put pressure on financial institutions’ profitability and this could lead to additional risk-taking among incumbents in an effort to maintain margins. Moreover, there could be new implications for financial stability from bigtech in finance and greater third-party dependencies.
As per the FSB analysis, the following are the key findings on the link between technological innovation and market structure:
-
To date, the relationship between incumbent financial institutions and fintech firms appears to be largely complementary and cooperative.
-
The competitive impact of bigtech may be greater than that of fintech firms. Bigtech firms typically have large, established customer networks and enjoy name recognition and trust.
-
For core operations, reliance by financial institutions on third-party data service providers (for example, data provision, cloud storage and analytics, and physical connectivity) is estimated to be low at present. However, this warrants ongoing attention from authorities.
BCBS notes that, although most supervisors have some reach over third-party providers—either directly or through contractual arrangements—the majority of supervisors indicate that they supervise third-party providers only in limited cases and have no formal structures in place to do so regularly. Particular attention is being devoted to the third-party dependencies issue, including by the BCBS and IOSCO. Going forward, the FSB Financial Innovation Network (FIN) is planning on, in cooperation with other groups, further exploring third-party dependencies in cloud services and single point of failure risks. Specifically, the FIN is seeking to better understand the market for cloud services for financial institutions (rather than for all clients), including how they manage lock-in risk and cross-border issues. Moreover, it is monitoring the activities of bigtech in finance, including cross-border activities.
Related Links
Keywords: International, Banking, Insurance, Securities, Fintech, Financial Stability, Bigtech, Market Structure, FSB
Next Article
IAIS Publishes Newsletter for February 2020Related Articles
EBA Finalizes Templates for One-Off Climate Risk Scenario Analysis
The European Banking Authority (EBA) has published the final templates, and the associated guidance, for collecting climate-related data for the one-off Fit-for-55 climate risk scenario analysis.
EBA Mulls Inclusion of Environmental & Social Risks to Pillar 1 Rules
The European Banking Authority (EBA) recently published a report that recommends enhancements to the Pillar 1 framework, under the prudential rules, to capture environmental and social risks.
BCBS Consults on Disclosure of Crypto-Asset Exposures of Banks
As a follow on from its prudential standard on the treatment of crypto-asset exposures, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) proposed disclosure requirements for crypto-asset exposures of banks.
BCBS and EBA Publish Results of Basel III Monitoring Exercise
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) and the European Banking Authority (EBA) have published results of the Basel III monitoring exercise.
PRA Updates Timeline for Final Basel III Rules, Issues Other Updates
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) recently issued a few regulatory updates for banks, with the updated Basel implementation timelines being the key among them.
US Treasury Sets Out Principles for Net-Zero Financing
The U.S. Department of the Treasury has recently set out the principles for net-zero financing and investment.
EC Launches Survey on G7 Principles on Generative AI
The European Commission (EC) launched a stakeholder survey on the draft International Guiding Principles for organizations developing advanced artificial intelligence (AI) systems.
ISSB Sustainability Standards Expected to Become Global Baseline
The finalization of the two sustainability disclosure standards—IFRS S1 and IFRS S2—is expected to be a significant step forward in the harmonization of sustainability disclosures worldwide.
IOSCO, BIS, and FSB to Intensify Focus on Decentralized Finance
Decentralized finance (DeFi) is expected to increase in prominence, finding traction in use cases such as lending, trading, and investing, without the intermediation of traditional financial institutions.
BCBS Assesses NSFR and Large Exposures Rules in US
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) published reports that assessed the overall implementation of the net stable funding ratio (NSFR) and the large exposures rules in the U.S.
