Featured Product

    EU Amends Benchmarks Regulation to Address Benchmark Cessation

    February 12, 2021

    EU published Regulation 2021/168, which amends the Benchmarks Regulation (2016/1011) with respect to the exemption of certain third-country spot foreign exchange benchmarks and the designation of replacements for certain benchmarks in cessation. The amendments have been made against the background of an expected phasing-out of the London Inter-Bank Offered Rate (LIBOR) by the end of 2021. The new rules are intended to reduce legal uncertainty and avoid risks to financial stability by making sure that a statutory replacement rate can be put in place by the time a systemically important benchmark is no longer in use. Regulation 2021/168 shall enter into force and apply from the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

    European Council had adopted these amendments on February 02, 2021. Regulation 2021/168 highlights that, to enable entities in EU to continue their business activities while mitigating foreign-exchange risk, certain spot foreign exchange benchmarks that are used in financial instruments to calculate contractual payouts and that are designated by EC in accordance with certain criteria have been excluded from the scope of Benchmarks Regulation. The current transitional period for third-country benchmarks has been extended. EC has been given the power to further extend the transitional period by means of a delegated act, for a maximum of two years, if the assessment on which that review is based demonstrates that the envisaged expiry of the transitional period would be detrimental to the continued use of third-country benchmarks in EU or would pose a threat to financial stability.

    To ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of Regulation 2021/168, implementing powers have been conferred on EC to designate a replacement for a benchmark to replace all references to that benchmark in contracts. EC should exercise its implementing powers only in situations where it assesses that the cessation or wind-down of a benchmark may result in negative consequences that significantly disrupt the functioning of financial markets or the real economy in the Union. Furthermore, EC should exercise its implementing powers only where it has become clear that the representativeness of the benchmark concerned cannot be restored or that the benchmark will cease permanently. Before exercising its implementing powers to designate a replacement for a benchmark, EC should conduct a public consultation and should take into account recommendations by relevant stakeholders and in particular by private sector working groups operating under the auspices of the public authorities or the central bank. 

    At the time of the adoption of Benchmark Regulation it was expected that, by the end of 2021, third countries would establish similar regulatory regimes for financial benchmarks and that the use, in EU by supervised entities, of third-country benchmarks would be ensured by equivalence decisions adopted by EC or by the recognition or endorsement granted by competent authorities. However, limited progress has been made in that regard. The scope of the regulatory regime for financial benchmarks differs significantly between EU and third countries. Therefore, to ensure the smooth functioning of the internal market and the availability of third-country benchmarks for use in EU after the end of the transitional period, EC should, by June 15, 2023, present a report on the review of the scope of Benchmarks Regulation, as amended by Regulation 2021/168, with regard to its effect on the use of third-country benchmarks in EU. In that report, EC should analyze the consequences of the far-reaching scope of such regulation for EU administrators and users of benchmarks also with respect to the continued use of third-country benchmarks. EC should also assess whether there is a need to further amend the Benchmarks Regulationto reduce  its scope only to administrators of certain types of benchmarks or to administrators whose benchmarks are widely used in EU.


    Related Links

    Effective Date: February 13, 2021

    Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Securities, LIBOR, Interest Rate Benchmark, Benchmark Reforms, Systemic Risk, Benchmarks Regulation, EC, European Parliament, European Council

    Featured Experts
    Related Articles

    FINMA Approves Merger of Credit Suisse and UBS

    The Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (FINMA) has approved the takeover of Credit Suisse by UBS.

    March 21, 2023 WebPage Regulatory News

    BOE Sets Out Its Thinking on Regulatory Capital and Climate Risks

    The Bank of England (BOE) published a working paper that aims to understand the climate-related disclosures of UK financial institutions.

    March 13, 2023 WebPage Regulatory News

    OSFI Finalizes on Climate Risk Guideline, Issues Other Updates

    The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) is seeking comments, until May 31, 2023, on the draft guideline on culture and behavior risk, with final guideline expected by the end of 2023.

    March 12, 2023 WebPage Regulatory News

    APRA Assesses Macro-Prudential Policy Settings, Issues Other Updates

    The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published an information paper that assesses its macro-prudential policy settings aimed at promoting stability at a systemic level.

    March 07, 2023 WebPage Regulatory News

    BIS Paper Examines Impact of Greenhouse Gas Emissions on Lending

    BIS issued a paper that investigates the effect of the greenhouse gas, or GHG, emissions of firms on bank loans using bank–firm matched data of Japanese listed firms from 2006 to 2018.

    March 03, 2023 WebPage Regulatory News

    HMT Mulls Alignment of Ring-Fencing and Resolution Regimes for Banks

    The HM Treasury (HMT) is seeking evidence, until May 07, 2023, on practicalities of aligning the ring-fencing and the banking resolution regimes for banks.

    March 02, 2023 WebPage Regulatory News

    MFSA Sets Out Supervisory Priorities, Issues Reporting Updates

    The Malta Financial Services Authority (MFSA) outlined its supervisory priorities for 2023

    March 02, 2023 WebPage Regulatory News

    German Regulators Issue Multiple Reporting Updates for Banks

    Deutsche Bundesbank published the nationally deactivated validation rules for the German Commercial Code (HGB) users on the taxonomy 3.2, which became valid from December 31, 2022

    March 02, 2023 WebPage Regulatory News

    BCBS Report Examines Impact of Basel III Framework for Banks

    The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) published results of the Basel III monitoring exercise based on the June 30, 2022 data.

    February 28, 2023 WebPage Regulatory News

    PRA Consults on Prudential Rules for "Simpler-Regime" Firms

    Among the recent regulatory updates from UK authorities, a key development is the first-phase consultation, from the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA), on simplifications to the prudential framework that would apply to the simpler-regime firms.

    February 28, 2023 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 8806