Featured Product

    BIS Paper Studies Incentives of For-Profit CCPs with Limited Liability

    February 11, 2019

    BIS published a working paper that studies the incentives of a for-profit central counterparties (CCP) with limited liability. A CCP faces a trade-off between fee income and counterparty credit risk. The paper investigates whether such CCP incentives undermine financial stability.

    Such for-profit CCPs choose how much capital to hold and set the collateral requirement for their clearing members, to maximize their own profits. They face a trade-off between fee income and counterparty credit risk. However, the limited liability of a CCP creates a misalignment between its choices and the socially optimal solution to this trade-off. In studying the factors that give rise to this misalignment, the paper derives the optimal capital regulations and examines the significant role of CCP ownership structures in safeguarding financial stability. This is the first paper that argues that a for-profit CCP would seek to hold less capital than is optimal from a social welfare perspective and, similarly, would require less collateral from its members than is optimal, thus undermining financial stability. From an empirical angle, this paper also provides the first evidence of a relationship between the capital held by CCPs and the collateral they require.

    The model developed in this paper implies that better-capitalized CCPs set higher collateral requirements. Empirical evidence suggests that a 1% increase in a for-profit CCP's capital is associated with a 0.6% increase in its members' collateral. Another implication, again deriving from its capitalization and collateral choices, is that a for-profit CCP is more likely to fail than is socially optimal. By contrast, a user-owned CCP chooses to hold more capital and is, therefore, less likely to fail. The data show that user-owned CCPs hold significantly more capital, on average, than for-profit CCPs do. Optimal capital requirements are derived for different levels of the clearing fees charged by for-profit CCPs. When this fee is low, the capital requirements incentivize CCPs to demand more collateral, thus bolstering financial stability. When fees are high, capital requirements do not change a CCP's incentives but serve to boost its loss-absorbing capacity.

     

    Related Links

    Keywords: International, PMI, Banking, Securities, CCPs, Financial Stability, Capital Requirements, BIS

    Related Articles
    News

    FDIC Proposes Amendments to Real Estate Lending Standards

    FDIC is seeking comments on a rule to amend the interagency guidelines for real estate lending policies—also known as the Real Estate Lending Standards.

    June 15, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    ISDA Consults on Implementation of Fallbacks for Certain Swap Rates

    ISDA is consulting on the implementation of fallbacks for the sterling LIBOR ICE Swap Rate and for the USD LIBOR ICE Swap Rate.

    June 11, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BIS and BoE Launch Innovation Hub in London

    BIS and BoE launched the BIS Innovation Hub Center in London, which is the fourth new Innovation Hub Centre to be opened in the past two years.

    June 11, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    ESRB Recommends Reciprocation of Certain Macroprudential Measures

    ESRB published recommendations on the reciprocation of macro-prudential measures in Belgium, France, Luxembourg, Norway, and Sweden.

    June 11, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    US Agencies Set Out Unified Agenda for Planned Regulatory Actions

    SEC announced that the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs released the Spring 2021 Unified Agenda of Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions.

    June 11, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EC Publishes Regulation on Key Aspects of Implementation of SA-CCR

    EC published the Delegated Regulation 2021/931, which supplements the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR or Regulation 575/2013) with regard to the regulatory technical standards specifying the method for identifying derivative transactions with one or more than one material risk driver.

    June 10, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BCBS Consults on Prudential Treatment of Cryptoasset Exposures

    BCBS is consulting on preliminary proposals for the prudential treatment of cryptoasset exposures of banks.

    June 10, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EBA Revises List of Validation Rules for Reporting

    EBA issued a revised list of validation rules under the implementing technical standards on supervisory reporting.

    June 10, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    Banking Authorities and Private Sector Collaborate on Wholesale CBDC

    BIS Innovation Hub, BDF, and SNB announced that, together with a private-sector consortium led by Accenture, they will conduct an experiment using wholesale central bank digital currency (wCBDC) for cross-border settlement.

    June 10, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    ESAs Publish Amended Implementing Standards on Mapping of ECAIs

    ESAs published two amended implementing technical standards on the mapping of credit assessments of External Credit Assessment Institutions (ECAIs).

    June 10, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 7093