February 11, 2019

BIS published a working paper that studies the incentives of a for-profit central counterparties (CCP) with limited liability. A CCP faces a trade-off between fee income and counterparty credit risk. The paper investigates whether such CCP incentives undermine financial stability.

Such for-profit CCPs choose how much capital to hold and set the collateral requirement for their clearing members, to maximize their own profits. They face a trade-off between fee income and counterparty credit risk. However, the limited liability of a CCP creates a misalignment between its choices and the socially optimal solution to this trade-off. In studying the factors that give rise to this misalignment, the paper derives the optimal capital regulations and examines the significant role of CCP ownership structures in safeguarding financial stability. This is the first paper that argues that a for-profit CCP would seek to hold less capital than is optimal from a social welfare perspective and, similarly, would require less collateral from its members than is optimal, thus undermining financial stability. From an empirical angle, this paper also provides the first evidence of a relationship between the capital held by CCPs and the collateral they require.

The model developed in this paper implies that better-capitalized CCPs set higher collateral requirements. Empirical evidence suggests that a 1% increase in a for-profit CCP's capital is associated with a 0.6% increase in its members' collateral. Another implication, again deriving from its capitalization and collateral choices, is that a for-profit CCP is more likely to fail than is socially optimal. By contrast, a user-owned CCP chooses to hold more capital and is, therefore, less likely to fail. The data show that user-owned CCPs hold significantly more capital, on average, than for-profit CCPs do. Optimal capital requirements are derived for different levels of the clearing fees charged by for-profit CCPs. When this fee is low, the capital requirements incentivize CCPs to demand more collateral, thus bolstering financial stability. When fees are high, capital requirements do not change a CCP's incentives but serve to boost its loss-absorbing capacity.

 

Related Links

Keywords: International, PMI, Banking, Securities, CCPs, Financial Stability, Capital Requirements, BIS

Related Articles
News

HKMA Revises Implementation Schedule for Initial Margin Rules

HKMA intends to adopt a revised implementation schedule for the margin requirements for non-centrally cleared derivatives.

August 16, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

FASB Proposes to Extend CECL Standard Deadline for Certain Entities

FASB proposed an Accounting Standards Update that would grant private companies, not-for-profit organizations, and certain small public companies additional time to implement FASB standards on current expected credit losses (CECL), leases, and hedging.

August 15, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

IASB Adds Phase Two of IBOR Reform to Its Work Plan

IASB (or the Board) has added the second phase of its project focused on potential financial reporting implications linked to the interest rate benchmark reform—interbank offer rate (IBOR) reform—to its work plan.

August 15, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

FED Updates Draft Instructions for Proposed FR Y-14 Reporting Forms

FED updated draft instructions for the monthly, quarterly, and annual capital assessments and stress testing reports, also known as forms FR Y-14M, FR Y-14Q, FR Y-14A, respectively.

August 15, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

APRA Applies Additional Capital Requirement for an Australian Insurer

APRA decided to apply an additional $250 million capital requirement to Allianz Australia Limited to reflect the issues identified in the risk governance self-assessment by the insurer.

August 14, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

APRA Consults on Final Phase Margin Rules for Uncleared Derivatives

APRA is consulting on amendments to the prudential standard CPS 226 on margin and risk mitigation requirements for non-centrally cleared derivatives.

August 14, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

BCBS FAQs on Implementation of Operational Risk Capital Requirements

BCBS published the first set of frequently asked questions (FAQs) to facilitate consistent global implementation of the standardized approach for operational risk capital.

August 14, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

MAS Publishes Rules on Single Counterparty Credit Limits for Banks

MAS published Notice 656 on rules to measure and limit exposures to a single counterparty group for banks incorporated in Singapore.

August 14, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

BoE Publishes Actual and Indicative MREL for Banks in UK

BoE published actual and indicative minimum requirements for own funds and eligible liabilities (MRELs) for UK banks and buildings societies that have bail-in or partial transfer resolution strategies.

August 14, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

OSFI Sets Out Plans for Implementation of Insurance Contracts Standard

OSFI published a letter that provides an update on the milestones completed and the activities underway with respect to the implementation of the insurance contracts standard International Financial Reporting Standard (IFRS) 17.

August 13, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 3638