ECB Updates Capital Requirements for Banks Post SREP Exercise
The European Central Bank (ECB) published the results of the Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process (SREP) for 2021. The SREP signaled a return to normalcy, following the pragmatic approach adopted in 2020, when capital requirements were kept stable on account of the pandemic and supervisory concerns were addressed mainly by means of recommendations, rather than requirements. Thus, ECB decided not to extend the pandemic-related capital and leverage relief for banks and has accordingly updated the set of frequently asked questions on pandemic-related measures. Furthermore, following the SREP exercise, ECB published the Pillar 2 capital requirements applicable to individual banks in 2022.
ECB will now expect banks to operate below the level of capital defined by Pillar 2 Guidance from January 01, 2023 and reinclude central bank exposures in leverage ratio from April 01, 2022. ECB had, in March 2020, allowed banks to operate below the level of capital defined by the Pillar 2 Guidance and the capital conservation buffer while, in July 2020, ECB had committed to maintaining this full buffer flexibility until at least the end of 2022. Additionally, in September 2020, ECB had allowed banks to exclude certain central bank exposures from the denominators of their leverage ratios owing to the exceptional macroeconomic circumstances while, in June 2021, ECB had extended that measure until the end of March 2022. Although there is still some uncertainty regarding the impact of the pandemic, banks have ample headroom above their capital requirements and above the leverage ratio requirement. At the end of September 2021, the aggregate Common Equity Tier 1 ratio of banks under direct ECB supervision stood at 15.47% while their aggregate leverage ratio stood at 5.88%.
The 2021 SREP cycle involved the assessment of banks’ capital, the assignment of SREP scores to banks’ overall risk profiles and their main elements, and the issuance of formal decisions in addition to recommendations. The SREP results show that banks have solid capital and liquidity positions, with scores that are broadly stable; this is another sign of the resilience of the banking system, given that the overall scores of banks might well have deteriorated significantly during the pandemic. In the 2021 cycle, credit risk and internal governance were the two main areas in terms of remedial measures requested of banks. Supervisors looked closely at the adequacy of credit risk controls of institutions. Several banks were found to have insufficiently strong credit risk management practices, with some having inadequate provisioning processes; in such cases, ECB downgraded credit risk scores and required more follow-up actions. Findings in the area of internal governance point to weakness in boards’ steering capabilities and governance arrangements such as risk control frameworks. This can hamper risk management and compliance functions as well as information technology transformation plans, impeding the resolution of data aggregation issues. Many banks also need to take steps to improve the composition and collective suitability of their management bodies, as they continue to place insufficient emphasis on diversity. With that in mind, ECB is using operational acts to require banks to establish diversity policies and set gender-related targets.
The ECB Banking Supervision assessed the risks and vulnerabilities faced by significant institutions and established the following three supervisory priorities for 2022‑24:
- To make sure banks emerge healthy from the pandemic. Supervisors will continue to address shortcomings in the credit risk management practices of banks, with a focus on the identification and classification of distressed borrowers, the valuation of collateral, and the adequacy of provisioning practices.
- Address structural weaknesses via effective digitalization strategies and enhanced governance. Supervisors will assess digitalization strategies of banks to ensure that institutions have adequate arrangements in place—in terms of governance, resources, skills, and risk management, among others—to make them sustainable in the long term.
- Tackle emerging risks. ECB Banking Supervision will design targeted and staggered supervisory responses to ensure that vulnerabilities related to these emerging risks are tackled; the responses would, for example, include a thematic review and a bottom-up stress test for climate‑related and environmental risks and a targeted review and onsite inspections for counterparty credit risk.
Related Links
- Press Release on SREP Results
- Pillar 2 Requirements
- Press Release on COVID Measures
- Frequently Asked Questions
- SREP Methodology
- Aggregated Results of SREP 2021
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Basel, Pillar 2 Guidance, SREP, Credit Risk, Operational Risk, Governance, Regulatory Capital, Pillar 2, ECB, Headline
Featured Experts
María Cañamero
Skilled market researcher; growth strategist; successful go-to-market campaign developer
Nicolas Degruson
Works with financial institutions, regulatory experts, business analysts, product managers, and software engineers to drive regulatory solutions across the globe.
Patrycja Oleksza
Applies proficiency and knowledge to regulatory capital and reporting analysis and coordinates business and product strategies in the banking technology area
Previous Article
EC Adopts Delegated Regulation to Amend Liquidity Coverage RulesRelated Articles
BIS and Central Banks Experiment with GenAI to Assess Climate Risks
A recent report from the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Innovation Hub details Project Gaia, a collaboration between the BIS Innovation Hub Eurosystem Center and certain central banks in Europe
Nearly 25% G-SIBs Commit to Adopting TNFD Nature-Related Disclosures
Nature-related risks are increasing in severity and frequency, affecting businesses, capital providers, financial systems, and economies.
Singapore to Mandate Climate Disclosures from FY2025
Singapore recently took a significant step toward turning climate ambition into action, with the introduction of mandatory climate-related disclosures for listed and large non-listed companies
SEC Finalizes Climate-Related Disclosures Rule
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has finalized the long-awaited rule that mandates climate-related disclosures for domestic and foreign publicly listed companies in the U.S.
EBA Proposes Standards Related to Standardized Credit Risk Approach
The European Banking Authority (EBA) has been taking significant steps toward implementing the Basel III framework and strengthening the regulatory framework for credit institutions in the EU
US Regulators Release Stress Test Scenarios for Banks
The U.S. regulators recently released baseline and severely adverse scenarios, along with other details, for stress testing the banks in 2024. The relevant U.S. banking regulators are the Federal Reserve Bank (FED), the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC).
Asian Governments Aim for Interoperability in AI Governance Frameworks
The regulatory landscape for artificial intelligence (AI), including the generative kind, is evolving rapidly, with governments and regulators aiming to address the challenges and opportunities presented by this transformative technology.
EBA Proposes Operational Risk Standards Under Final Basel III Package
The European Union (EU) has been working on the final elements of Basel III standards, with endorsement of the Banking Package and the publication of the European Banking Authority (EBA) roadmap on Basel III implementation in December 2023.
EFRAG Proposes XBRL Taxonomy and Standard for Listed SMEs Under ESRS
The European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG), which plays a crucial role in shaping corporate reporting standards in European Union (EU), is seeking comments, until May 21, 2024, on the Exposure Draft ESRS for listed SMEs.
ECB to Expand Climate Change Work in 2024-2025
Banking regulators worldwide are increasingly focusing on addressing, monitoring, and supervising the institutions' exposure to climate and environmental risks.