BIS Papers Address Aspects of Climate Risk and Sustainable Finance
The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) published three papers that focus on the role of technology in combating climate change, the financial market pricing of physical and transition risks related to climate change, and the policy recommendations for sustainable finance, based on lessons learned on information governance.
The paper on climate technology addresses aspects such as whether the market channels capital toward (mature) technologies that have a higher potential to reduce CO2 emissions in the short to medium run, whether capital is geared toward companies that develop new technologies, and what is the performance of investments targeted at innovative climate tech companies. The key finding is that private investors channel more capital toward mature technologies with a high emission reduction potential (ERP). In contrast, funds invested by the US government are channeled toward nascent low-ERP sectors that receive less private capital. While taken individually, these sectors have a low ERP score, but together their impact is potentially significant. The paper also shows that, as the government supports these sectors and as the market expands, they attract more private capital. The paper traces the improvement in the allocative efficiency of private capital to an increase in the proportion of mature companies, a shift toward less capital-intensive software solutions, and more participation of better-informed investors.
The paper on pricing of climate risks summarizes the academic literature on the financial market pricing of physical and transition risks related to climate change. The paper notes that investors grapple with three major challenges when seeking to price climate risks adequately. First, the aggregate nature of climate risks limits the availability of risk-sharing arrangements and hedging instruments. Second, the high degree of uncertainty about climate risks and concrete policy actions to address them heightens modeling and measurement challenges. Third, the information available to investors about climate risks and their consequences is often incomplete or imperfect. The paper notes that opaque and unstructured methodologies make it hard for investors to extract information from ESG ratings and that ESG ratings and green innovation may not fully align. In the United States, firms with lower ESG scores, which are excluded from the investment universe of ESG funds, tend to be important green innovators. This misalignment might have implications for pricing and efficient capital allocation.
The paper on information governance in sustainable finance is related to the work undertaken by public bodies and stakeholder coalitions to develop guidelines that improve the information available to sustainable
finance investors. The paper discusses ways to enhance information governance in sustainable finance, a sector of funding markets that, in addition to financial returns, considers social and environmental benefits. Information governance is the set of regulatory provisions designed to mitigate conflicts of interest that could interfere with these flows. The paper reviews the common market failures in corporate disclosures and rating provision, along with the governance mechanisms used to address these issues; for instance, the market failures in corporate disclosures can be tackled by mandatory standards and assurance. The paper outlines the following key policy recommendations:
- Mandatory baseline disclosure standards to improve the comparability of sustainability-related information across firms
- Focus on historical developments instead of requiring forward-looking information, along with clear requirements to fully disclose negative events
- Different (proportionate) disclosure regimes for small and medium enterprises due to their inability to acquire and process the complex data
- Restriction of competition among rating agencies and giving more weight to ratings from agencies with a significant volume outside sustainable finance
- Enhancement of regulatory monitoring during booms, since the gains from lower standards are larger at such times and when issuers contribute a substantial amount of revenue to the agencies
- Provisions to ensure the integrity of commercial data repositories
Related Links
Keywords: International, Banking, Climate Change Risk, ESG, Sustainable Finance, Climate Risk Pricing, Disclosures, Reporting, Basel, ESG Ratings, BIS
Featured Experts
María Cañamero
Skilled market researcher; growth strategist; successful go-to-market campaign developer
Nicolas Degruson
Works with financial institutions, regulatory experts, business analysts, product managers, and software engineers to drive regulatory solutions across the globe.
Patrycja Oleksza
Applies proficiency and knowledge to regulatory capital and reporting analysis and coordinates business and product strategies in the banking technology area
Previous Article
CBUAE Includes Financial Cloud, KYC, and Open Finance on Its AgendaNext Article
FED and OCC Release Stress Test Scenarios for 2023Related Articles
BIS and Central Banks Experiment with GenAI to Assess Climate Risks
A recent report from the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Innovation Hub details Project Gaia, a collaboration between the BIS Innovation Hub Eurosystem Center and certain central banks in Europe
Nearly 25% G-SIBs Commit to Adopting TNFD Nature-Related Disclosures
Nature-related risks are increasing in severity and frequency, affecting businesses, capital providers, financial systems, and economies.
Singapore to Mandate Climate Disclosures from FY2025
Singapore recently took a significant step toward turning climate ambition into action, with the introduction of mandatory climate-related disclosures for listed and large non-listed companies
SEC Finalizes Climate-Related Disclosures Rule
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has finalized the long-awaited rule that mandates climate-related disclosures for domestic and foreign publicly listed companies in the U.S.
EBA Proposes Standards Related to Standardized Credit Risk Approach
The European Banking Authority (EBA) has been taking significant steps toward implementing the Basel III framework and strengthening the regulatory framework for credit institutions in the EU
US Regulators Release Stress Test Scenarios for Banks
The U.S. regulators recently released baseline and severely adverse scenarios, along with other details, for stress testing the banks in 2024. The relevant U.S. banking regulators are the Federal Reserve Bank (FED), the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC).
Asian Governments Aim for Interoperability in AI Governance Frameworks
The regulatory landscape for artificial intelligence (AI), including the generative kind, is evolving rapidly, with governments and regulators aiming to address the challenges and opportunities presented by this transformative technology.
EBA Proposes Operational Risk Standards Under Final Basel III Package
The European Union (EU) has been working on the final elements of Basel III standards, with endorsement of the Banking Package and the publication of the European Banking Authority (EBA) roadmap on Basel III implementation in December 2023.
EFRAG Proposes XBRL Taxonomy and Standard for Listed SMEs Under ESRS
The European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG), which plays a crucial role in shaping corporate reporting standards in European Union (EU), is seeking comments, until May 21, 2024, on the Exposure Draft ESRS for listed SMEs.
ECB to Expand Climate Change Work in 2024-2025
Banking regulators worldwide are increasingly focusing on addressing, monitoring, and supervising the institutions' exposure to climate and environmental risks.