EIOPA Publishes Discussion Paper on IBOR Transitions
EIOPA published the discussion paper on interbank offered rate (IBOR) transitions. This discussion paper addresses, for the first time, the subject of the ongoing changes to the new benchmark rates, along with the issues identified in the EIOPA risk-free rate environment. The comment period for this paper is open until April 30, 2020. Based on the feedback received to this discussion paper, EIOPA will launch a consultation, which will include specific policy recommendations on the subject of IBOR transitions.
The focus of this discussion paper is to address the issues identified with the EIOPA risk-free rate methodology and the EIOPA risk-free rate production and to propose solutions and options for consideration. The paper highlights the potential impact of IBOR transitions on the definition and the use of the Credit Rate Adjustment currently applied on the risk-free rate term structures. Furthermore, the paper proposes options and a coherent approach for dealing with the new term structures calculated with the new benchmark rates for all currencies. The proposed approaches are generic and can be applied to all currencies.
The IBOR transition is a big challenge for both the regulators and the industry. New rates have differences between each other and the timing of the change for each jurisdiction may vary, thus posing additional challenges. Overall, the impact of the IBOR transitions in all currencies will be directly reflected on liability valuations, asset-liability management calculations and derivative valuations, and the structure of numerous (existing and new) financial and insurance products, which will refer to the new rates. Re-calibration of existing products and revaluations is expected to take place.
The risk-free rate methodology of EIOPA seeks to reflect the current market conditions rather than leading them to continue producing consistent risk-free rate term structures. According to the risk-free rate methodology, the approach of EIOPA is designed to secure the objectives of replicability of the methodology by undertakings, market consistency of the risk-free rate term structures produced, stability for insurance undertakings, and interests of policyholders. All four criteria, along with the criterion of the feasibility of the implementation within the risk-free rate framework have been considered thoroughly. Additional issues related to the IBOR transitions, which emerge outside the risk-free rate environment and may, directly or indirectly, affect the insurance industry and the policyholders are not covered in this paper.
Related Links
Comment Due Date: April 30, 2020
Keywords: Europe, EU, Insurance, Benchmarks Regulation, Risk-Free Rates, ALM, IBOR Transition, Benchmark Reforms, EIOPA
Featured Experts
Scott Dietz
Scott is a Director in the Regulatory and Accounting Solutions team responsible for providing accounting expertise across solutions, products, and services offered by Moody’s Analytics in the US. He has over 15 years of experience leading auditing, consulting and accounting policy initiatives for financial institutions.
Karen Moss
Senior practitioner in asset and liability management (ALM) and liquidity risk who assists banking clients in advancing their treasury and balance sheet management objectives
Yashan Wang
Leads a team that develops analytic and empirical models for impairment under GAAP, CECL, IFRS 9, and SAP for credit portfolio analysis and asset-liability management
Related Articles
ISSB Sustainability Standards Expected to Become Global Baseline
The finalization of the two sustainability disclosure standards—IFRS S1 and IFRS S2—is expected to be a significant step forward in the harmonization of sustainability disclosures worldwide.
IOSCO, BIS, and FSB to Intensify Focus on Decentralized Finance
Decentralized finance (DeFi) is expected to increase in prominence, finding traction in use cases such as lending, trading, and investing, without the intermediation of traditional financial institutions.
BCBS Assesses NSFR and Large Exposures Rules in US
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) published reports that assessed the overall implementation of the net stable funding ratio (NSFR) and the large exposures rules in the U.S.
Global Agencies Focus on ESG Data, Climate Litigation and Nature Risks
At the global level, supervisory efforts are increasingly focused on addressing climate risks via better quality data and innovative use of technologies such as generative artificial intelligence (AI) and blockchain.
ISSB Standards Shine Spotlight on Comparability of ESG Disclosures
The finalization of the IFRS sustainability disclosure standards in late June 2023 has brought to the forefront the themes of the harmonization of sustainability disclosures
EBA Issues Several Regulatory and Reporting Updates for Banks
The European Banking Authority (EBA) recently issued several regulatory publications impacting the banking sector.
BCBS Proposes to Revise Core Principles for Banking Supervision
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) launched a consultation on revisions to the core principles for effective banking supervision, with the comment period ending on October 06, 2023.
US Proposes Final Basel Rules, Transition Period to Start in July 2025
The U.S. banking agencies (FDIC, FED, and OCC) recently proposed rules implementing the final Basel III reforms, also known as the Basel III Endgame.
FSB Report Outlines Next Steps for Climate Risk Roadmap
The Financial Stability Board (FSB) recently published the second annual progress report on the July 2021 roadmap to address climate-related financial risks.
EBA Plans on Ad-hoc ESG Data Collection and Climate Scenario Exercise
The recognition of climate change as a systemic risk to the global economy has further intensified regulatory and supervisory focus on monitoring of the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) risks.
