EBA launched a consultation on the revised guidelines on money laundering and terrorist financing (ML/TF) risk factors as part of a broader communication on AML/CFT issues. This update takes into account changes to the EU Anti Money Laundering and Counter Terrorism Financing (AML/CFT) legal framework and the new ML/TF risks, including those identified in the implementation reviews of EBA. The consultation ends on May 05, 2020. Additionally, EBA published its first report on the competent authorities’ approaches to the AML/CFT supervision of banks. This report describes broadly how competent authorities in this year’s sample apply the risk-based approach set out in international standards. This guidelines and report are part of the EBA’s new role to lead, coordinate, and monitor the fight against ML/TF, which has been explained in the accompanying factsheet.
Proposed Guidelines on AML/CFT Risk Factors
The draft guidelines, which are addressed to both financial institutions and supervisors, set out factors that institutions should consider when assessing the ML/TF risk associated with a business relationship or occasional transaction. EBA is proposing key changes, including new guidance on compliance with the provisions on enhanced customer due diligence related to high-risk third countries. New sectoral guidelines have been added for crowdfunding platforms, corporate finance, payment initiation services providers, and account information service providers and for firms providing activities of currency exchanges offices.
The revised guidelines provide more details on terrorist financing risk factors and customer due diligence measures, including the identification of the beneficial owner and the use of innovative solutions to identify and verify customer identity. In addition, the proposed guidelines set clear regulatory expectations of firms’ business-wide and individual ML/TF risk assessments. The proposed changes will significantly strengthen AML/CFT defenses in Europe and foster greater convergence of supervisory practices in areas where supervisory effectiveness has been hampered, so far, by divergent approaches in the implementation of the same European legal requirements.
Report on Approaches of Competent Authorities to AML/CFT Supervision
The EBA findings show that most competent authorities in this year’s sample are taking significant steps to strengthen their approach to AML/CFT supervision. Several competent authorities have made the fight against ML/TF one of their key priorities and, in a number of cases, significantly expanded their AML/CFT supervisory teams. Nevertheless, EBA found that significant challenges remain and are common to all competent authorities in the sample. These challenges include the need to move away from a focus on tick-box compliance to assessing the effectiveness of the AML/CFT systems and controls of banks. Competent authorities also need to strengthen their approach to ensuring compliance by taking more proportionate and sufficiently dissuasive measures to correct deficiencies in the AML/CFT systems and controls of banks. Finally, EBA found that not all competent authorities were able to cooperate effectively with domestic and international stakeholders to draw on synergies and to position AML/CFT in the wider national and international supervisory framework.
- Press Release on Draft Guidelines
- Draft Guidelines (PDF)
- Press Release on AML/CFT Supervision Report
- Report (PDF)
- Factsheet (PDF)
Comment Due Date: May 05, 2020
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, AML/CFT, ML/TF Risk, Risk-Based Approach, ML/TF, Guidelines, EBA
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published four draft principles to support supervisory efforts in assessing the representativeness of COVID-19-impacted data for banks using the internal ratings based (IRB) credit risk models.
The European Council and the European Parliament (EP) reached a provisional political agreement on the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD).
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) launched a consultation (CP6/22) that sets out proposal for a new Supervisory Statement on expectations for management of model risk by banks.
The European Commission (EC) published the Delegated Regulation 2022/954, which amends regulatory technical standards on specification of the calculation of specific and general credit risk adjustments.
The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Innovation Hub updated its work program, announcing a set of projects across various centers.
The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) published two consultation papers—one on the supervisory statement on exclusions related to systemic events and the other on the supervisory statement on the management of non-affirmative cyber exposures.
Certain members of the U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs issued a letter to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) published a consultation paper on the advice on the review of the securitization prudential framework in Solvency II.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) issued a statement on PRA buffer adjustment while the Bank of England (BoE) published a notice on the statistical reporting requirements for banks.
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) issued principles for the effective management and supervision of climate-related financial risks.