BCBS Study Examines Initial Experience with G-SIB Framework
BCBS published a working paper that analyzes the initial experience with the global systemically important bank (G-SIB) framework. The paper investigates whether G-SIBs and non-G-SIBs have behaved differently since the implementation of the G-SIB framework and if observed differences in behavior are in accordance with the aims of the framework. It also examines the regional differences in the behavior of G-SIBs and non-G-SIBs.
The analysis reveals that G-SIBs and non-G-SIBs behave differently; however, both groups are heterogeneous, so that the indicator outcomes are often highly influenced by a few banks. Nevertheless, most G-SIBs have reduced their G-SIB scores during the period assessed, changing their balance sheets in ways that are consistent with the aims of the G-SIB framework. In contrast, non-G-SIBs have increased their relative G-SIB scores during the same period. Finally, the regional analysis indicates that trends in banks' G-SIB indicators, and the indicators that contribute most to the final G-SIB score, are heterogeneous across countries and regions. While G-SIBs from the euro area, Great Britain, and the United States have reduced their systemic importance for most indicators, Chinese and Japanese G-SIBs showed relatively positive growth rates for all indicators—and particularly high ones for indicators in the substitutability category.""
For this analysis, the sample of G-SIBs and non-G-SIBs were divided into six and 10 countries or regions. G-SIBs were grouped into United States, Euro area, non-euro area, Great Britain, China, and Japan. The non-G-SIBs were grouped into euro area (Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, and Spain); non-euro area, United States, Canada, China, Australia, Japan, Korea, and Others (non-G-SIBs of Brazil, India, Russia, and Singapore).
Related Links
Keywords: International, Banking, G-SIB, Systemic Risk, G-SIB Framework, Macro-prudential Assessment, BCBS
Previous Article
Bundesbank Updates Derivation Rules for Completeness Check Under SSMRelated Articles
|
News
FASB Issues Minor Improvements to Financial Instruments StandardsFASB issued an Accounting Standards Update (ASU No. 2019-04) that clarifies and improves areas of guidance related to the recently issued standards on credit losses (Topic 326), derivatives and hedging (Topic 815), and recognition and measurement of financial instruments (Topic 825).
April 25, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
APRA Grants License to New Authorized Deposit-Taking InstitutionAPRA announced that it has granted Judo Bank Pty Ltd a license to operate as an authorized deposit-taking institution without restrictions, under the Banking Act 1959.
April 24, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
BoE Report on Evaluation of Approach to Concurrent Stress TestingBoE published a report on the evaluation, by the Independent Evaluation Office (IEO), of the effectiveness of the approach of BoE to concurrent stress testing.
April 24, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
FDIC Consults on Approach to Resolution Planning for IDIsFDIC approved an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPR) and is seeking comment on ways to tailor and improve its rule requiring certain insured depository institutions (IDIs) to submit resolution plans.
April 22, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
FDIC Specifies Submission Timeline for FFIEC 031, 041, and 051 ReportsFDIC published the financial institution letters (FIL-21-2019 and FIL-22-2019) that offer guidance on submission of Call Reports FFIEC 051, FFIEC 041, and FFIEC 031 for the first quarter of 2019.
April 19, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
US Agencies Propose to Revise Call Reports FFIEC 031, 041, and 051US Agencies (FDIC, FED, and OCC) proposed to revise and extend, for three years, the Call Reports FFIEC 031, FFIEC 041, and FFIEC 051.
April 19, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
US Agencies Propose to Amend Rule on Supplementary Leverage RatioUS Agencies (FDIC, FED, and OCC) are proposing to revise the capital requirements for supplementary leverage ratio, as required by the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection (EGRRCP) Act.
April 18, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
EIOPA Held InsurTech Roundtable on Use of Cloud Computing by InsurersEIOPA had, on April 11, 2019, hosted its Fourth InsurTech Roundtable on the use of cloud computing by insurance undertakings.
April 17, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
EP Resolution on Proposal for Sovereign Bond Backed SecuritiesThe European Parliament (EP) published adopted text on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on sovereign bond-backed securities (SBBS).
April 16, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
HKMA Decides to Maintain Countercyclical Capital Buffer at 2.5%HKMA announced that, in accordance with the Banking (Capital) Rules, the countercyclical capital buffer (CCyB) ratio for Hong Kong remains at 2.5%.
April 16, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
