HKMA is consulting, until January 31, 2021, on the draft rules on contractual stays on termination rights in financial contracts for authorized institutions (Stay Rules) to be made under the Financial Institutions (Resolution) Ordinance (Cap. 628)—also known as FIRO. HKMA also released conclusion to its consultation on the Stay Rules that were published in January 2020. After reviewing feedback from the consultation, HKMA has adopted appropriate refinements in developing the draft Stay Rules. In addition, HKMA published a consultation on the revised Supervisory Policy Manual module (IC-6) that specifies the minimum standards that authorized institutions should observe in relation to the sharing and use of consumer credit data through credit reference agencies; this consultation is open until February 01, 2021.
In response to the January consultation on Stay Rules, HKMA had received a total of 14 submissions from industry associations, professional associations, banks, an accounting firm, and law firms. All respondents indicated broad support for the proposed approach to the Stay Rules and provided constructive comments on the proposals set out in the consultation paper. Some sought additional clarity on the details of the proposals in the consultation paper. The Stay Rules require authorized institutions incorporated in Hong Kong and certain of their group companies to include an appropriate provision in certain non-Hong Kong law governed financial contracts to the effect that the parties to the contracts agree to be bound by a temporary suspension of termination rights that may be imposed by HKMA under section 90 of the FIRO.
The Stay Rules are designed to address the cross-border risks to orderly resolution arising from the early termination of financial contracts governed by non-Hong Kong law, in line with the contractual approach to giving effect to cross-border resolution actions advocated by FSB. It is intended to introduce the Stay Rules into the Legislative Council for negative vetting within the current legislative year of 2020-21, with a view to bringing the Stay Rules into operation shortly after the completion of the vetting process in 2021.
Comment Due Date: January 31, 2021/February 01, 2021
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Hong Kong, Banking, Securities, Stay Rules, FIRO, Financial Contract, Resolution Framework, FSB, HKMA
Previous ArticleFED Extends and Revises FR Y-9C and FR 2886b Reports for Banks
ESAs published the final draft implementing technical standards on reporting of intra-group transactions and risk concentration of financial conglomerates subject to the supplementary supervision in EU.
EBA published the annual report on asset encumbrance of banks in EU.
FED updated the reporting form and instructions for the FR Y-9C report on consolidated financial statements for holding companies.
EBA issued a consultation paper on the guidelines on monitoring of the threshold and other procedural aspects of the establishment of intermediate EU parent undertakings, or IPUs, as laid down in the Capital Requirements Directive.
EC published Regulation 2021/25 that addresses amendments related to the financial reporting consequences of replacement of the existing interest rate benchmarks with alternative reference rates.
BIS published a bulletin, or a note, that examines the cyber threat landscape in the context of the pandemic and discusses policies to reduce risks to financial stability.
HM Treasury, also known as HMT, has updated the table containing the list of the equivalence decisions that came into effect in UK at the end of the transition period of its withdrawal from EU.
EBA published an erratum for technical package on phase 1 of the reporting framework 3.0.
APRA updated a frequently asked question (FAQ), for authorized deposit-taking institutions, on the measurement of credit risk weighted assets.
ECB published a letter from Andrea Enria, the Chair of the Supervisory Board of ECB, answering questions raised by the President of the Bundestag (the German federal parliament) on how ECB assesses the financial stability of the euro area in the context of the significant level of nonperforming loans.