EIOPA Revises LEI Guidelines, Issues Results of Stress Test
The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) revised the guidelines on Legal Entity Identifier (LEI) and expects national competent authorities to apply these revised guidelines from July 01, 2022. EIOPA also published a Decision (EIOPA-BoS-21/517) that repeals and replaces the Decision on collection of information under Solvency II (EIOPA- BoS-15/198). The new Decision will enter into force on the day following its adoption and it enhances the scope, not only with respect to Solvency II, but also addresses information on pensions (IORP) and pan-European pension products (PEPP) frameworks. The timelines, channels, and formats of submission have been updated, along with the EIOPA Taxonomy Roadmap. The revised timelines for the national authorities to submit to EIOPA the Quarterly Solvency II information affect only reporting obligations with undertaking or group submission date after the publication of this Decision. Another EIOPA update involves the publication of results of the 2021 insurance stress test, along with an associated factsheet and a set of the frequently asked questions about this exercise.
The 2021 insurance stress test assessed the industry’s resilience to a prolonged COVID-19 scenario in a “lower for longer” interest rate environment. EIOPA also performed a capital and solvency assessment and, for the first time, examined participants’ pre- and post-stress liquidity positions. The test allowed participants to calculate their post-stress position using two distinct approaches: the fixed balance sheet approach without management actions and the constrained balance sheet approach, where reactive management actions were permitted. Based on the results of this exercise, EIOPA will assess the need for issuing recommendations on relevant concerns identified in the exercise. The following are the key findings from the stress test exercise:
- Despite the grave economic and financial implications of the COVID-19 pandemic, the European insurance industry entered the stress test exercise with a strong level of capitalization—evidenced by a solvency ratio of 217.9% at the end of 2020. This robust buffer in the solvency ratio allowed participants absorb the shock of the adverse scenario.
- The capital component of the exercise confirmed that the main vulnerabilities for the sector stem from market shocks, and, specifically, from the decoupling of the risk free rate and risk premia, the so-called double-hit scenario.
- In the fixed balance sheet approach, where no management actions against the prescribed shocks could be enforced, the aggregate solvency ratio decreased by 92.1pp to 125.7%, bringing nine undertakings under the regulatory threshold of 100%. Results improved when participants, under the constrained balance sheet approach, were allowed to take reactive management actions. The actions taken reduced the original drop seen in the fixed balance sheet approach by 13.6pp to an aggregate solvency ratio of 139.3% and helped seven participants return their post-stress solvency ratios to above 100%. The insurance industry, therefore, demonstrated that it has tools at its disposal to cope with adverse market and economic effects.
- Despite the material cut in excess assets over liabilities, none of the participants reported an Assets over Liability ratio below 100%, neither under the fixed nor under the constrained balance sheet approach. This confirms the industry’s ability to meet promises to policyholders amid severe adverse developments of the economy and the markets.
- The long term guarantee measures which are part of the Solvency II regulation helped absorb part of the severe but plausible shocks, limiting the drop in participants’ solvency ratio. Nevertheless, the stress test also revealed that a section of the market still heavily relies on transitional measures, which, unlike long-term guarantees, are to be phased out by 2032. Undertakings should take concrete steps toward reducing their dependence on temporary measures that were put in place to smooth the transition from Solvency I to the Solvency II regime.
- The liquidity component of the stress test showed that the liquidity position of participants appears to be a less significant concern than solvency positions given the sector’s large holdings of liquid assets. Still, outcomes show that insurers cannot rely solely on their cash holdings to cover unexpected outflows.
Related Links
- LEI Guidelines
- Decision on Information Collection
- Taxonomy Roadmap (XLSX)
- Press Release on Insurance Stress Test
- Report on Insurance Stress Test (PDF)
- Factsheet on Stress Test (PDF)
- FAQs on Stress Test (PDF)
Keywords: Europe, EU, Insurance, Solvency II, IORP, PEPP, Reporting, Taxonomy, COVID-19, Stress Testing, Solvency Ratio, Liquidity Risk, LEI, Guidelines, EIOPA
Featured Experts

Karen Moss
Senior practitioner in asset and liability management (ALM) and liquidity risk who assists banking clients in advancing their treasury and balance sheet management objectives

María Cañamero
Skilled market researcher; growth strategist; successful go-to-market campaign developer

Nicolas Degruson
Works with financial institutions, regulatory experts, business analysts, product managers, and software engineers to drive regulatory solutions across the globe.
Previous Article
EBA Enhances Proportionality in Reporting, Makes Other AnnouncementsRelated Articles
ISSB Sustainability Standards Expected to Become Global Baseline
The finalization of the two sustainability disclosure standards—IFRS S1 and IFRS S2—is expected to be a significant step forward in the harmonization of sustainability disclosures worldwide.
IOSCO, BIS, and FSB to Intensify Focus on Decentralized Finance
Decentralized finance (DeFi) is expected to increase in prominence, finding traction in use cases such as lending, trading, and investing, without the intermediation of traditional financial institutions.
BCBS Assesses NSFR and Large Exposures Rules in US
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) published reports that assessed the overall implementation of the net stable funding ratio (NSFR) and the large exposures rules in the U.S.
Global Agencies Focus on ESG Data, Climate Litigation and Nature Risks
At the global level, supervisory efforts are increasingly focused on addressing climate risks via better quality data and innovative use of technologies such as generative artificial intelligence (AI) and blockchain.
ISSB Standards Shine Spotlight on Comparability of ESG Disclosures
The finalization of the IFRS sustainability disclosure standards in late June 2023 has brought to the forefront the themes of the harmonization of sustainability disclosures
EBA Issues Several Regulatory and Reporting Updates for Banks
The European Banking Authority (EBA) recently issued several regulatory publications impacting the banking sector.
BCBS Proposes to Revise Core Principles for Banking Supervision
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) launched a consultation on revisions to the core principles for effective banking supervision, with the comment period ending on October 06, 2023.
US Proposes Final Basel Rules, Transition Period to Start in July 2025
The U.S. banking agencies (FDIC, FED, and OCC) recently proposed rules implementing the final Basel III reforms, also known as the Basel III Endgame.
FSB Report Outlines Next Steps for Climate Risk Roadmap
The Financial Stability Board (FSB) recently published the second annual progress report on the July 2021 roadmap to address climate-related financial risks.
EBA Plans on Ad-hoc ESG Data Collection and Climate Scenario Exercise
The recognition of climate change as a systemic risk to the global economy has further intensified regulatory and supervisory focus on monitoring of the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) risks.