Featured Product

    EBA Consults on Standards to Identify Staff for Remuneration Purposes

    December 19, 2019

    EBA is consulting on the draft regulatory technical standards on the criteria to identify all categories of staff whose professional activities have a material impact on the risk profile of institutions (referred to as "risk takers"). The suggested identification process is based on a combination of qualitative and quantitative criteria. The consultation runs until February 19, 2020. After the finalization of the draft regulatory technical standards, these standards are expected to be submitted to EC in June 2020.

    These draft standards have been revised in light of Article 94 (2) of the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD), as amended by the EU Directive 2019/878 (CRD5) that mandates EBA to develop draft regulatory technical standards to set out the criteria to define managerial responsibility and control functions; material business unit and significant impact on the risk profile of the relevant business unit; other categories of staff not expressly referred to in Article 92(3) CRD. The risk takers will be identified based on the criteria laid down in the revised Capital Requirements Directive (CRD) and those specified within the draft regulatory technical standards. The qualitative criteria that were set out in 2014 in the regulatory technical standards on the identified staff have been largely retained in the updated draft regulatory technical standards. The revised qualitative criteria identify staff with managerial responsibilities and with decision-making powers that have a material impact on the institutions risk profile.

    In terms of quantitative criteria, the revised CRD sets out a threshold of total remuneration of EUR 500,000 combined with the average of the remuneration of members of the management body and senior management. The draft regulatory technical standards retain the additional quantitative criteria that identify the staff high levels of remuneration above EUR 750,000 and the 0.3% of staff with the highest remuneration, based on the rebuttable presumption that the professional activities of those members of the staff would have a material impact on the risk profile of institutions.

    Members of staff are identified as having a material impact on the risk profile of an institution as soon as they meet at least one of the criteria, be it the criteria foreseen under the CRD, the qualitative or quantitative criteria in the draft regulatory technical standards, or, where necessary because of the specificities of their business model, the additional internal criteria, to ensure that all risk takers are identified.


    Related Links

    Comment Due Date: February 19, 2020

    Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, CRD5, Operational Risk, Remuneration, Regulatory Technical Standards, EBA

    Related Articles

    BOE Sets Out Its Thinking on Regulatory Capital and Climate Risks

    The Bank of England (BOE) published a working paper that aims to understand the climate-related disclosures of UK financial institutions.

    March 13, 2023 WebPage Regulatory News

    OSFI Finalizes on Climate Risk Guideline, Issues Other Updates

    The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) is seeking comments, until May 31, 2023, on the draft guideline on culture and behavior risk, with final guideline expected by the end of 2023.

    March 12, 2023 WebPage Regulatory News

    BIS Paper Examines Impact of Greenhouse Gas Emissions on Lending

    BIS issued a paper that investigates the effect of the greenhouse gas, or GHG, emissions of firms on bank loans using bank–firm matched data of Japanese listed firms from 2006 to 2018.

    March 03, 2023 WebPage Regulatory News

    HMT Mulls Alignment of Ring-Fencing and Resolution Regimes for Banks

    The HM Treasury (HMT) is seeking evidence, until May 07, 2023, on practicalities of aligning the ring-fencing and the banking resolution regimes for banks.

    March 02, 2023 WebPage Regulatory News

    BCBS Report Examines Impact of Basel III Framework for Banks

    The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) published results of the Basel III monitoring exercise based on the June 30, 2022 data.

    February 28, 2023 WebPage Regulatory News

    PRA Consults on Prudential Rules for "Simpler-Regime" Firms

    Among the recent regulatory updates from UK authorities, a key development is the first-phase consultation, from the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA), on simplifications to the prudential framework that would apply to the simpler-regime firms.

    February 28, 2023 WebPage Regulatory News

    DNB Publishes Multiple Reporting Updates for Banks

    DNB, the central bank of Netherlands, updated the list of additional reporting requests and published additional data quality checks and XBRL-Formula linkbase documents for the first quarter of 2023.

    February 28, 2023 WebPage Regulatory News

    NBB Sets Out Climate Risk Expectations, Issues Reporting Updates

    The National Bank of Belgium (NBB) published a communication on climate-related and environmental risks, issued an update on XBRL reporting

    February 24, 2023 WebPage Regulatory News

    EBA Updates Address Securitization Standards and DGS Guidelines

    The European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final draft of the regulatory technical standards that set out conditions for assessment of homogeneity of the underlying exposures in simple, transparent, and standardized (STS) securitizations.

    February 21, 2023 WebPage Regulatory News

    FSB Publishes Letter to G20, Sets Out Work Priorities for 2023

    The Financial Stability Board (FSB) published a letter intended for the G20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors, highlighting the work that FSB will take forward under the Indian G20 Presidency in 2023

    February 20, 2023 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 8793