APRA announced that it will remove its supervisory benchmark on interest-only residential mortgage lending by authorized deposit-taking institutions. The benchmark was put in place as a temporary measure in March 2017, as part of a range of actions over recent years to reinforce sound lending practices. The introduction of the benchmark has led to a marked reduction in the proportion of new interest-only lending, which is now significantly below the 30% threshold.
Earlier this year, APRA announced its intention to remove the supervisory benchmark on investor loan growth, subject to the authorized deposit-taking institutions providing certain assurances about the strength of their lending standards. Most authorized deposit-taking institutions have now provided those assurances. The authorized deposit-taking institutions that are no longer subject to the investor loan growth benchmark will also no longer be subject to the benchmark on interest-only lending from January 01, 2019. For other authorized deposit-taking institutions, the supervisory benchmark will be removed concurrently with the removal of the investor loan growth benchmark.
Notwithstanding the removal of the interest-only benchmark, authorized deposit-taking institutions still need to ensure they maintain adequate oversight of the level and type of interest-only lending, consistent with APRA’s Prudential Practice Guide APG 223 Residential Mortgage Lending and ASIC’s responsible lending obligations on borrower requirements and objectives. APRA plans to conduct a review of the authorized deposit-taking institution risk controls on interest-only lending next year, as part of a broader assessment of improvements that have been made in lending standards. Along with the other members of the Council of Financial Regulators, APRA will also continue to closely monitor conditions in the housing market. As with investor loan growth, a re-acceleration in interest-only lending at an industry-wide level would raise systemic concerns. In such a scenario, APRA would consider the need to apply industry-wide measures in response.
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Australia, Banking, Residential Mortgage Lending, APG 223, Supervisory Benchmark, APRA
APRA finalized the reporting standard ARS 115.0 on capital adequacy with respect to the standardized measurement approach to operational risk for authorized deposit-taking institutions in Australia.
ECB published a guide that outlines the principles and methods for calculating the penalties for regulatory breaches of prudential requirements by banks.
MAS and The Association of Banks in Singapore (ABS) jointly issued a paper that sets out good practices for the management of operational and other risks stemming from new work arrangements adopted by financial institutions amid the COVID-19 pandemic.
ACPR announced that a new data collection application, called DLPP (Datalake for Prudential), for collecting banking and insurance prudential data will go into production on April 12, 2021.
BCB announced that the Financial Stability Committee decided to maintain the countercyclical capital buffer (CCyB) for Brazil at 0%, at least until the end of 2021.
EBA is consulting on the implementing technical standards for Pillar 3 disclosures on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) risks, as set out in requirements under Article 449a of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).
ESAs Issue Advice on KPIs on Sustainability for Nonfinancial Reporting
EIOPA has launched a European-wide comparative study on non-life underwriting risk in internal models, also kicking-off of the data collection phase.
SRB published an overview of the resolution tools available in the Banking Union and their impact on a bank’s ability to maintain continuity of access to financial market infrastructure services in resolution.
EU published Directive 2021/338, which amends the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID) II and the Capital Requirements Directives (CRD 4 and 5) to facilitate recovery from the COVID-19 crisis.