European Council Agrees on Measures to Prevent Accumulation of NPLs
The European Council presidency and the European Parliament agreed on a new framework for dealing with the non-performing loans (NPLs) of banks. In addition, EU ambassadors have agreed the Council's negotiating position on a proposal reinforcing the role of EBA regarding the risks posed to the financial sector by money laundering activities.
Agreement on NPLs
A provisional political agreement was reached on capital requirements applying to banks with NPLs on their balance sheets. The deal will now be submitted for endorsement by EU ambassadors. The proposal, initially put forward by EC in March 2018, aims to create a prudential framework for banks to deal with new NPLs and thus reduce the risk of their accumulation in the future. It provides for requirements to set aside sufficient own resources when new loans become non-performing and creates appropriate incentives to address NPLs at an early stage. On the basis of a common definition of NPLs, the proposed new rules introduce a "prudential backstop"—that is, common minimum loss coverage for the amount of money banks need to set aside to cover losses caused by future loans that turn non-performing. In case a bank does not meet the applicable minimum level, deductions from banks' own funds would apply. The agreement will be submitted for endorsement by EU ambassadors. Parliament and Council will then be called on to adopt the proposed regulation at first reading.
Agreement on Proposal Related to AML
EU Ambassadors agreed on the stance regarding the proposal on anti-money laundering (AML). Strengthening the role and powers of EBA regarding AML supervision for financial institutions would ensure that AML rules are effectively applied in all member states and all authorities involved (in particular prudential and AML supervisors) cooperate closely with each other. According to the agreed text, EBA would be given, in particular, the following tasks:
- Collecting information from national competent authorities on weaknesses identified in the context of their action to prevent or fight money laundering and terrorist financing
- Enhancing the quality of supervision through the development of common standards and coordination among national supervisory authorities
- Performing risk assessments on competent authorities to evaluate their strategies and resources to address the most important emerging AML risks at EU level
- Facilitating cooperation with non-EU countries on cross-border case
- As a last resort if national authorities do not act, EBA would be able to address decisions directly to individual banks
EU and its member states have engaged in a thorough review of existing practices for cooperation between anti-money laundering and prudential supervisors. On December 04, 2018, the Council adopted an action plan setting out short-term non-legislative actions to better tackle AML challenges. The Council recommended that a "post-mortem" analysis of recent money laundering cases in EU banks would be conducted to understand how they came about and to help shape possible additional actions. The European rules on AML have been considerably strengthened in recent years, with two consecutive reforms being adopted since 2015. The latest revision of the AML directive was adopted in April 2018 and is due to be transposed at national level by January 2020. The presidency of the Council will need to negotiate with the European Parliament to reach a final agreement before the new rules can be adopted and applied.
- European Council Press Release on NPLs
- EC Press Release on NPLs
- European Council Press Release on AML
- Presidency Compromise Proposal on AML (PDF)
Keywords: Europe, EU, NPLs, AML/CFT, AML/CFT Directive, Prudential Backstops, European Council
Previous ArticleExpert Group of EC Issues Recommendations on Framework for Fintech
FINMA Approves Merger of Credit Suisse and UBS
The Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (FINMA) has approved the takeover of Credit Suisse by UBS.
BOE Sets Out Its Thinking on Regulatory Capital and Climate Risks
The Bank of England (BOE) published a working paper that aims to understand the climate-related disclosures of UK financial institutions.
OSFI Finalizes on Climate Risk Guideline, Issues Other Updates
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) is seeking comments, until May 31, 2023, on the draft guideline on culture and behavior risk, with final guideline expected by the end of 2023.
APRA Assesses Macro-Prudential Policy Settings, Issues Other Updates
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published an information paper that assesses its macro-prudential policy settings aimed at promoting stability at a systemic level.
BIS Paper Examines Impact of Greenhouse Gas Emissions on Lending
BIS issued a paper that investigates the effect of the greenhouse gas, or GHG, emissions of firms on bank loans using bank–firm matched data of Japanese listed firms from 2006 to 2018.
HMT Mulls Alignment of Ring-Fencing and Resolution Regimes for Banks
The HM Treasury (HMT) is seeking evidence, until May 07, 2023, on practicalities of aligning the ring-fencing and the banking resolution regimes for banks.
MFSA Sets Out Supervisory Priorities, Issues Reporting Updates
The Malta Financial Services Authority (MFSA) outlined its supervisory priorities for 2023
German Regulators Issue Multiple Reporting Updates for Banks
Deutsche Bundesbank published the nationally deactivated validation rules for the German Commercial Code (HGB) users on the taxonomy 3.2, which became valid from December 31, 2022
BCBS Report Examines Impact of Basel III Framework for Banks
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) published results of the Basel III monitoring exercise based on the June 30, 2022 data.
PRA Consults on Prudential Rules for "Simpler-Regime" Firms
Among the recent regulatory updates from UK authorities, a key development is the first-phase consultation, from the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA), on simplifications to the prudential framework that would apply to the simpler-regime firms.