EIOPA Publishes Final Advice Resulting from 2020 Solvency II Review
EIOPA published the opinion on the 2020 review of the Solvency II regime. Overall, EIOPA notes that the Solvency II framework is working well from the prudential perspective and no fundamental changes are needed, rather a number of adjustments are required to ensure that the regulatory framework continues as a well-functioning risk-based regime. The opinion also reflects the need to supplement the current micro-prudential framework with a macro-prudential perspective, including the introduction of specific tools and measures to equip supervisors with sufficient powers to address all sources of systemic risk. EC proposal on the review is expected in the third quarter of 2021.
The proposed measures aim to keep the regime fit-for-purpose by introducing a balanced update of the regulatory framework, reflecting better the economic situation, and completing the missing elements from the regulatory toolbox; in short, these three areas form the EIOPA approach to Solvency II review. The EIOPA opinion considers the 19 topics covered in the EC call for advice (published in February 2019) to EIOPA on the review of the Solvency II Directive. As included in the opinion, the key proposals from EIOPA include the following:
- Adjustments to the capital treatment of interest rate risk, reflecting the steep fall of interest rates experienced during the last years and the existence of negative interest rates; recommendation for changes to the interest rate curves used by insurers to value liabilities, specifically in respect of the method of extrapolating risk-free rates to better reflect market reality
- Improvements to the volatility adjustment to better align the design to its objectives and increase its effectiveness in curbing short-term volatility and rewarding insurers for holding illiquid liabilities
- Refinements to the calculation of the risk margin of insurance liabilities, recognizing diversification over time, thus reducing its volatility and size, in particular for long-term liabilities
- Revisions to the criteria for the ability to hold equity long-term, by making a link with long-term illiquid liabilities, with the aim to better reflect risks and further encourage long term investments
- Clear risk-based quantitative criteria to identify low-risk undertakings eligible for applying proportionality measures, by recommending the introduction of a new process for applying and supervising the principle of proportionality
- Support for efficient exchange of information among national supervisory authorities during the process of authorization and in case of material changes in cross-border activities
- Establishment of a minimum harmonized and comprehensive recovery and resolution framework and the introduction of a European network of national Insurance Guarantee Scheme that should meet a minimum set of harmonized features with the primary aim to protect policyholders—paying compensation when needed or ensuring the continuation of insurance policies
Accompanying the opinion are several documents, including
- Factsheet providing an overview of the opinion
- Background document setting out the analysis that the EIOPA technical advice for the 2020 review is based on and an annex to this document covering natural catastrophe (nat cat) policy conditions
- Impact assessment of individual policy options per topic, for the advice
EIOPA also published a report on quantitative reporting templates and annexes containing templates and related instructions; this material covers the Individual Quantitative Reporting Templates at solo and group levels, including Financial Stability Reporting. This report aims to provide stakeholders the full view of the future reporting and disclosure requirements, as a complement of the legislative proposals in this area covered by the Opinion. The document contains information on the templates proposed for deletion, templates proposed for simplification, new templates proposed for inclusion, and the revision and inclusion of new risk-based thresholds to provide an understanding of the reporting and disclosure framework envisaged by EIOPA, particularly the application of the proportionality principle in reporting requirements. Based on the proposals included in this document, EIOPA will propose amendments to the implementing technical standards on reporting and disclosure and will revise the EIOPA guidelines on Financial Stability Reporting in accordance with its mandate.
Related Links
Keywords: Europe, EU, Insurance, Solvency II, Solvency II Review, ESG, Resolution Framework, Reporting, Proportionality, Macro-Prudential Framework, Disclosures, Opinion, Solvency Capital Requirements, EIOPA
Featured Experts
María Cañamero
Skilled market researcher; growth strategist; successful go-to-market campaign developer
Nicolas Degruson
Works with financial institutions, regulatory experts, business analysts, product managers, and software engineers to drive regulatory solutions across the globe.
Scott Dietz
Scott is a Director in the Regulatory and Accounting Solutions team responsible for providing accounting expertise across solutions, products, and services offered by Moody’s Analytics in the US. He has over 15 years of experience leading auditing, consulting and accounting policy initiatives for financial institutions.
Previous Article
EC Adopts Draft Regulation on Supervisory Reporting Under CRRRelated Articles
BIS and Central Banks Experiment with GenAI to Assess Climate Risks
A recent report from the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Innovation Hub details Project Gaia, a collaboration between the BIS Innovation Hub Eurosystem Center and certain central banks in Europe
Nearly 25% G-SIBs Commit to Adopting TNFD Nature-Related Disclosures
Nature-related risks are increasing in severity and frequency, affecting businesses, capital providers, financial systems, and economies.
Singapore to Mandate Climate Disclosures from FY2025
Singapore recently took a significant step toward turning climate ambition into action, with the introduction of mandatory climate-related disclosures for listed and large non-listed companies
SEC Finalizes Climate-Related Disclosures Rule
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has finalized the long-awaited rule that mandates climate-related disclosures for domestic and foreign publicly listed companies in the U.S.
EBA Proposes Standards Related to Standardized Credit Risk Approach
The European Banking Authority (EBA) has been taking significant steps toward implementing the Basel III framework and strengthening the regulatory framework for credit institutions in the EU
US Regulators Release Stress Test Scenarios for Banks
The U.S. regulators recently released baseline and severely adverse scenarios, along with other details, for stress testing the banks in 2024. The relevant U.S. banking regulators are the Federal Reserve Bank (FED), the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC).
Asian Governments Aim for Interoperability in AI Governance Frameworks
The regulatory landscape for artificial intelligence (AI), including the generative kind, is evolving rapidly, with governments and regulators aiming to address the challenges and opportunities presented by this transformative technology.
EBA Proposes Operational Risk Standards Under Final Basel III Package
The European Union (EU) has been working on the final elements of Basel III standards, with endorsement of the Banking Package and the publication of the European Banking Authority (EBA) roadmap on Basel III implementation in December 2023.
EFRAG Proposes XBRL Taxonomy and Standard for Listed SMEs Under ESRS
The European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG), which plays a crucial role in shaping corporate reporting standards in European Union (EU), is seeking comments, until May 21, 2024, on the Exposure Draft ESRS for listed SMEs.
ECB to Expand Climate Change Work in 2024-2025
Banking regulators worldwide are increasingly focusing on addressing, monitoring, and supervising the institutions' exposure to climate and environmental risks.