Featured Product

    EBA Issues Standards on Capital Requirements for Non-Modellable Risks

    December 17, 2020

    EBA published the final draft regulatory technical standards on the capitalization of non-modellable risk factors (NMRFs) for institutions using the Internal Model Approach under the Fundamental Review of the Trading Book (FRTB) implemented in EU as a reporting requirement. The draft standards lay down a methodology for use by institutions to determine the own funds requirements related to non-modellable risk factors in the new market risk regime. The standards set out how institutions are to determine the stress scenario risk measure corresponding to a non-modellable risk factor. The development of these regulatory technical standards fulfills an EBA mandate under the revised Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR2).

    The regulatory standards set out methodologies that institutions are required to use to determine the extreme scenario of future shock that, when applied to the non-modellable risk factor, provides the stress scenario risk measure. These standards require institutions to identify a stress period for each broad risk-factor category and to collect data on non-modellable risk factors for the stress period, to determine an extreme scenario of future shock. Once the stress period is identified, institutions can use the following methods:

    • The direct method, which involves directly calculating the expected shortfall measure of the losses that would occur when varying the given risk factor as in the relevant stress period
    • The stepwise method, wherein institutions approximate the expected shortfall of the losses by first calculating a shock calibrated to an expected shortfall measure on the returns observed for that risk factor and then calculating the loss corresponding to the movement in the risk factor identified by that calibrated shock

    The stepwise method requires significantly fewer loss calculations than the direct method. The computation of the calibrated shock for returns under the stepwise method depends on the number of observations available for the stress period. The draft standards also clarify how this has to be done when the number of observations for a non-modellable risk factor is insufficient to obtain meaningful statistical estimates. Additionally, these draft regulatory technical standards specify: 

    • A regulatory extreme scenario of future shock that should be applied where the institution is unable to determine a scenario based on the abovementioned methodologies, or where the competent authority is unsatisfied with the extreme scenario of future shock generated by the institution
    • That the regulatory extreme scenario of future shock is the one leading to the maximum loss that can occur due to a change in the non-modellable risk factor and they set out a specific framework to be used where that maximum loss is not finite
    • That institutions may calculate a stress scenario risk measure at regulatory bucket level (that is, for more than one risk factor), where the institution uses the regulatory bucketing approach to assess the modellability of the risk factors within the regulatory buckets
    • The formula that institutions should use when aggregating the stress scenario risk measures

    These draft standards are one of the key deliverables in the EBA work on implementing the revised market risk framework in EU and as part of the roadmap for the new market and counterparty credit risk approaches that were published on June 27, 2019. EBA had launched, in July 2019, a data collection exercise presenting several stress scenario risk measure calculation method variants. The purpose of the data collection exercise was to apply the EBA non-modellable risk factor methodology proposals that were proposed in the discussion paper toward implementation of the revised market risk and counterparty credit risk frameworks in EU. Post which, in June 2020, EBA had published the consultation paper on which these final draft technical standards are based. Thus, the proposed regulatory technical standards are the result of an iterative process where the views of market participants have been sought several times.

     

    Related Links

    Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Market Risk, FRTB, Regulatory Capital, Basel, NMRF, Regulatory Technical Standards, CRR2, Internal model, EBA

    Related Articles
    News

    APRA Publishes Results of Climate Risk Self-Assessment Survey

    The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) has published the findings of its latest climate risk self-assessment survey conducted across the banking, insurance, and superannuation industries.

    August 04, 2022 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    ACPR Publishes Updates Related to CRD IV and Covered Bonds

    The French Prudential Supervisory Authority (ACPR) published a notice related to the methods for calculating and publishing prudential ratios under the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD IV) and the minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities (MREL).

    August 03, 2022 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BIS Paper Contributes to Debate on Regulating NBFIs and Big Techs

    The Financial Stability Institute (FSI) of the Bank for International Settlements recently published a paper proposing a framework for classifying financial stability regulation as either entity-based or activity-based.

    August 03, 2022 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EIOPA Publishes Guidance on Climate Change Scenarios in ORSA

    The European Insurance and Occupational Pension Authority (EIOPA) published the risk dashboard based on Solvency II data and the final version of the application guidance on climate change materiality assessments and climate change scenarios in the Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA).

    August 02, 2022 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EBA and ECB Respond to Proposals on Sustainability Disclosures

    The European Banking Authority (EBA) and the European Central Bank (ECB) published their responses to the consultations of the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) and the European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG) on sustainability-related disclosure standards.

    August 01, 2022 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BIS Report Notes Existing Gaps in Climate Risk Data at Central Banks

    A Consultative Group on Risk Management (CGRM) at the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) published a report that examines incorporation of climate risks into the international reserve management framework.

    July 29, 2022 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EBA Publishes Multiple Regulatory Updates for Regulated Entities

    The European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final guidelines on liquidity requirements exemption for investment firms, updated version of its 5.2 filing rules document for supervisory reporting, and Single Rulebook Question and Answer (Q&A) updates in July 2022.

    July 29, 2022 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EIOPA Issues SII Taxonomy and Guide on Sustainability Preferences

    The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) published Version 2.8.0 of the Solvency II data point model (DPM) and XBRL taxonomy.

    July 29, 2022 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EESC Opines on Proposals on CRR and European Single Access Point

    The European Union published, in the Official Journal of the European Union, an opinion from the European Economic and Social Committee (EESC); the opinion is on the proposal for a regulation to amend the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).

    July 29, 2022 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    HM Treasury Publishes Multiple Regulatory Updates in July 2022

    HM Treasury published a draft statutory instrument titled “The Financial Services (Miscellaneous Amendments) (EU Exit) Regulations 2022,” along with the related explanatory memorandum and impact assessment.

    July 29, 2022 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 8423