Featured Product

    EBA Explains Methodology for Assessing AML/CFT Risks

    December 17, 2020

    EBA published its first report on progress made by competent authorities with the setting up of colleges to enhance supervisory cooperation of anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT) purposes. EBA also published the methodology for conducting risk assessments under Article 9a of the revised EBA Regulation. This methodology sets out how EBA will identify emerging money laundering/terrorist financing (ML/TF) risks and how it will conduct the risk assessment. The methodology also explains the review and publication process of the outcome of each risk assessment. Going forward, EBA will use this methodology to assess whether the use of its powers under Article 9a is warranted. Monitoring of colleges and performing risk assessments are part of the new role of EBA to lead, coordinate, and monitor the fight against ML/TF in all EU member states.

    The EBA methodology for conducting risk assessments will be approved by the EBA Standing Committee on AML/CFT. The main objective of a risk assessment under Article 9a is to establish how well-equipped competent authorities are to tackle the emerging ML/TF risks, in terms of their capabilities and resources to respond to future risks that may arise as well as to intervene early and in a coordinated manner to manage those risks across the single market.  In the risk assessment process, EBA staff will follow the principles of proportionality, particularly when requesting the information from competent authorities. This means that, before asking for information, EBA staff will examine the information already available to it from the EBA database or other sources. EBA provides a detailed explanation of how EBA will identify and assess risks as part of this assessment. EBA staff will follow a five-stage process which includes identification of emerging risks for the assessment; setting the scope for the assessment; identification of competent authorities for the assessment; conducting the Article 9a risk assessment; and outcomes of the risk assessment.

    The report on progress of competent authorities provides examples of good and poor practices, drawing on the lessons learned from the first colleges, with the aim of supporting the effective and efficient setting up and operation of new colleges going forward. EBA also identified challenges and observed limited or no participation by third-country authorities or prudential supervisors  in some colleges. Overall, EBA observed a number of good practices that may have contributed to the effectiveness and efficiency of some of the AML/CFT colleges attended:

    • Mapping of financial institutions operating on a cross-border basis was completed by competent authorities by using multiple sources of information. This ensured that all required members and observers were identified and invited to the college contributing to the completeness of the information that was exchanged within the college.
    • The lead supervisor shared with other members within the college a list of third-country AML/CFT authorities identified by the lead supervisor as potential observers. The list, together with the confidentiality requirements applicable in these authorities, was then discussed within the college meeting. As a result, the members agreed to invite these observers to the next meeting of the college.
    • Through careful planning of the agenda, the right balance was achieved between presentations and round‐table discussions within the meeting. Also, it meant that sufficient time was allocated for discussions. This meant that all members and observers had an opportunity to share their views and practices.
    • In addition to the scheduled meetings, some colleges made use of ad‐hoc college meetings in situations where a quick action or a quick decision from all members was required.
    • Terms of a written cooperation agreement were discussed between the members at the first meeting and the agreement was signed by all members soon after that. This ensured that information could be freely exchanged within the college
    • The agenda for the meeting was shared by the lead supervisor well in advance of the meeting, for the members’ comments. This meant that members could contribute to the agenda and ensure that they were available to attend the meeting
    • Minutes summarizing the key points discussed and actions agreed at the meeting were shared with the members and observers following the meeting. In some instances, minutes were supplemented with a table providing an overview of the supervisory actions and measures taken in each jurisdiction.

     

    Related Links

    Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, AML/CFT, ML/TF Risk, Supervisory Colleges, EBA

    Related Articles
    News

    EC Delegated Regulation on Specialized Lending Exposures Under CRR

    EC finalized the Delegated Regulation 2021/598 that supplements the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR or 575/2013) and lays out the regulatory technical standards for assigning risk-weights to specialized lending exposures.

    April 14, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    OSFI Consults on Minimum Qualifying Rate for Uninsured Mortgages

    OSFI is proposing new minimum qualifying rate for uninsured mortgages under the Guideline B-20.

    April 13, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    ECB Updates List of Supervised Entities in EU in April 2021

    ECB updated the list of supervised entities in EU, with the number of significant supervised entities amounting to 115 as of the March 01, 2021 cut-off date.

    April 12, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    OSFI Issues Letter on ICAAP Submission and Internal Audit of BCAR

    OSFI issued a letter to confirm that a formal Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process (ICAAP) submission is not required in 2021.

    April 12, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EC Agrees to Prolong Scheme to Support NPL Reduction at Greek Banks

    EC has approved the prolongation of an existing Greek scheme aiming to support the reduction of nonperforming loans, or NPLs, of Greek banks on the basis that it remains free of any State aid.

    April 09, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EIOPA Study Examines Internal Model Market and Credit Risks Under SII

    EIOPA published a report presenting the results of its yearly study on the internal modeling of market and credit risks under the Solvency II Directive, also known as SII.

    April 09, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    ESMA Issues Notification Templates for STS Synthetic Securitizations

    ESMA published the interim simple, transparent, and standardized (STS) notification templates for synthetic securitizations, post the recent amendments to the Securitization Regulation.

    April 09, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EBA Issues Erratum for Phase 2 Package of Reporting Framework 3.0

    EBA published an erratum for the technical package on phase 2 of the reporting framework 3.0.

    April 08, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EBA Updates Lists of Entities for Use in Capital Calculations under SA

    EBA published an erratum for the technical package on phase 2 of the reporting framework 3.0.

    April 08, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FED Proposes to Automate Bank Stock Adjustment Using Call Report Data

    FED published a proposal to automate non-merger-related adjustments to member banks' subscriptions to Federal Reserve Bank capital stock.

    April 08, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 6835