EIOPA published a report presenting sensitivity analysis of the climate-change-related transition risks in the investment portfolio of European insurers. The report explores current holdings of corporate bonds and equity that can be related to key climate-policy relevant sectors such as fossil fuel extraction, carbon‐intensive industries, vehicle production, and the power sector. It also quantifies potential climate-change-related transition risks and presents insights into the possible impact of these risks on such investments, as economies transition away from fossil fuel-dependent energy production and carbon-intensive production. The results of the analysis show that these investments may expose the insurance sector to transition risks in the event of a drastic alignment of the economies to an outcome in line with the aims of the Paris Agreement to limit global warming.
EIOPA has established a comprehensive strategy and work-plan under the umbrella of sustainable finance. This report contributes to that work and to informing the future work at EIOPA, including potentially future stress testing. Using data reported under Solvency II and available to EIOPA, combined with external data sources, this sensitivity analysis represents a first assessment of climate-change related “transition” risks in the portfolio of European insurers. To quantify these risks, this report employs a “what-if” scenario analysis based on the identified holdings and government bond holdings to provide insights into possible values at risks under the scenarios and assumptions employed. The “what-if” scenarios draw input from several external sources and combine them in a consistent narrative calibrated on the current holdings of European insurers. Also, this report considers part of the challenges faced by European insurers in this context, namely asset-side transition risks; it does not explore changes to the liabilities and, therefore, does not consider any impact on measures such as own funds or capitalization.
The results in this report show that with relatively conservative estimates for both holdings and price adjustments, losses on equity investments in the high-carbon sector can be high, reaching up to 25% on average for these particular equity holdings (before accounting for any counterbalancing investments in e.g. renewable energy). However, the overall impact on the balance sheets of the insurance sector is counter-balanced both by investments in renewable energy and the fact that the high-carbon investments considered here account for a small part of the total investments of European insurers. Losses on bonds are also lower than those on equities. Solvency II is a risk-based regime and insurers, therefore, generally hold well-diversified portfolios, which is reflected in the overall size of the losses. Despite this, impacts compared to excess of assets over liabilities, a relevant measure of impact, are non-negligible and may be substantial under the more severe assumptions and scenarios considered in this analysis.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Insurance, ESG, Climate Change Risk, Transition Risk, Solvency II, Paris Agreement, Green Deal, Sustainable Finance, EIOPA
Dr. Denton provides industry leadership in the quantification of sustainability issues, climate risk, trade credit and emerging lending risks. His deep foundations in market and credit risk provide critical perspectives on how climate/sustainability risks can be measured, communicated and used to drive commercial opportunities, policy, strategy, and compliance. He supports corporate clients and financial institutions in leveraging Moody’s tools and capabilities to improve decision-making and compliance capabilities, with particular focus on the energy, agriculture and physical commodities industries.
Previous ArticleEBA Updates Basel III Impact Study Following EC Call for Advice
The European Central Bank (ECB) is undertaking the integrated reporting framework (IReF) project to integrate statistical requirements for banks into a standardized reporting framework that would be applicable across the euro area and adopted by authorities in other EU member states.
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision met, shortly after a gathering of the Group of Central Bank Governors and Heads of Supervision (GHOS), the oversight body of BCBS.
The International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) welcomed the work of the international audit and assurance standard setters—the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB)
The European Banking Authority (EBA) has been awarded the top European Standard for its environmental performance under the European Eco-Management and Audit Scheme (EMAS).
The Bank of England (BoE) published a Statistical Notice (2022/18), which informs that due to the Bank Holiday granted for Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II’s State Funeral on Monday September 19, 2022.
The French Prudential Control and Resolution Authority (ACPR) announced that the European Banking Authority (EBA) has updated its filing rules and the implementation dates for certain modules of the EBA reporting framework 3.2.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) announced reduction in the aggregate Committed Liquidity Facility (CLF) for authorized deposit-taking entities to ~USD 33 billion on September 01, 2022.
The China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission (CBIRC) published the administrative measures for internal control of wealth management companies, which come into force on the day of promulgation.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) proposed its approach to policy-making as it takes on wider rulemaking responsibilities under the Financial Services and Markets Bill.
The European Central Bank (ECB) published its opinion on the proposal for a regulation on harmonized rules on fair access to and use of data (Data Act).