EBA to Amend Regulatory Technical Standards on Credit Risk Adjustments
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final report amending the draft regulatory technical standards on credit risk adjustments used in the calculation of the risk-weight of defaulted exposures under the standardized approach to credit risk. The draft standards amend the Delegated Regulation 183/2014 on prudential requirements for credit institutions and investment firms. The proposed amendments follow up on the Action Plan of the European Commission to tackle Non-Performing Loans (NPLs) in the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic; the plan indicated the need for a revision of the treatment of purchased defaulted exposures under the standardized approach.
The Action Plan of the European Commission specifically asks EBA to reconsider the appropriate regulatory treatment of the risk-weight for purchased defaulted assets, as laid out in the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR), which have been sold at a discount (NPL sales). Under the current regulatory framework, the capital charge for a defaulted exposure may—under certain circumstances—increase after its sale from a risk-weight of 100% on the seller’s balance sheet to a risk-weight of 150% on the balance sheet of the credit institution buying the assets. The proposed amendment to the existing regulatory technical standards on credit risk adjustments introduces a change to the recognition of total credit risk adjustments to ensure that the risk-weight remains the same in both cases. In particular, the price discount stemming from the sale will be recognized as a credit risk adjustment for the purposes of determining the risk-weight. By implementing this change through an amendment to the regulatory standards, EBA aims to clarify the regulatory treatment of sold NPL assets. EBA also recommends that the treatment set out in this set of regulatory technical standards be directly reflected in the level 1 text, in line with European Commission CRR3 proposal.
Article 110(4)(e) of CRR (Regulation 575/2013) mandates EBA to specify the amounts that need to be included in the calculation of credit risk adjustments for the determination of default under Article 178 of CRR. In light of the COVID-19 pandemic, it is desirable to remove any impediment to the creation of secondary markets for defaulted exposures. In this context, a misalignment between the risk-weight applied to defaulted assets and the potential for unexpected losses in relation to the level of already expected losses could create undue obstacles for credit institutions to move their non-performing loans off their balance sheets. Therefore, it is necessary to ensure that the specific credit risk adjustments recognized for Article 127(1) of CRR incorporate any discount in a transaction price that the buyer has not recognized by increasing the common equity tier 1 capital. This revision is necessary to ensure that the prudential framework does not create disincentives to the sale of non-performing assets by banks. The final draft regulatory technical standards will be submitted to the European Commission for endorsement before being published in the Official Journal of the European Union and will apply 20 days after their publication in this Official Journal.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Basel, CRR, Regulatory Technical Standards, Credit Risk, Regulatory Capital, Risk-Weighted Assets, Defaulted Exposures, Standardized Approach, EBA
Skilled market researcher; growth strategist; successful go-to-market campaign developer
Works with financial institutions, regulatory experts, business analysts, product managers, and software engineers to drive regulatory solutions across the globe.
ESG and climate expert for P&C insurance; IFRS 17 specialist and chartered accountant; extensive experience in both life and non-life insurance, with focus on capital management, financial performance, and financial reporting.
Previous ArticleBSP Issues Statements on Digitalization and Sustainable Finance
FINMA Approves Merger of Credit Suisse and UBS
The Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (FINMA) has approved the takeover of Credit Suisse by UBS.
BOE Sets Out Its Thinking on Regulatory Capital and Climate Risks
The Bank of England (BOE) published a working paper that aims to understand the climate-related disclosures of UK financial institutions.
OSFI Finalizes on Climate Risk Guideline, Issues Other Updates
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) is seeking comments, until May 31, 2023, on the draft guideline on culture and behavior risk, with final guideline expected by the end of 2023.
APRA Assesses Macro-Prudential Policy Settings, Issues Other Updates
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published an information paper that assesses its macro-prudential policy settings aimed at promoting stability at a systemic level.
BIS Paper Examines Impact of Greenhouse Gas Emissions on Lending
BIS issued a paper that investigates the effect of the greenhouse gas, or GHG, emissions of firms on bank loans using bank–firm matched data of Japanese listed firms from 2006 to 2018.
HMT Mulls Alignment of Ring-Fencing and Resolution Regimes for Banks
The HM Treasury (HMT) is seeking evidence, until May 07, 2023, on practicalities of aligning the ring-fencing and the banking resolution regimes for banks.
MFSA Sets Out Supervisory Priorities, Issues Reporting Updates
The Malta Financial Services Authority (MFSA) outlined its supervisory priorities for 2023
German Regulators Issue Multiple Reporting Updates for Banks
Deutsche Bundesbank published the nationally deactivated validation rules for the German Commercial Code (HGB) users on the taxonomy 3.2, which became valid from December 31, 2022
BCBS Report Examines Impact of Basel III Framework for Banks
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) published results of the Basel III monitoring exercise based on the June 30, 2022 data.
PRA Consults on Prudential Rules for "Simpler-Regime" Firms
Among the recent regulatory updates from UK authorities, a key development is the first-phase consultation, from the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA), on simplifications to the prudential framework that would apply to the simpler-regime firms.