While delivering a keynote speech at the L’Agefi’s 10th Meeting of the Financial Industry, Erkki Liikanen, Chair of the Trustees of the IFRS Foundation expressed his views on whether big tech is a threat to financial stability. He noted that certain aspects of the financial system are inefficient and even outdated. The entry of big tech and fintech firms poses challenges and represents an opportunity to energize the market for payment services, credit provision, and insurance, among other services. He also shared his observations on the actions policy makers should take to deal with the resulting challenges.
Mr. Liikanen spoke about the BIS contribution to the discussion on the role big techs. He said, "Professor Hyun Song Shin, economic adviser and head of research for the BIS, sets out both the opportunities and risks associated with big tech in finance. In his regulatory compass, the menu of policy choices can be reflected to help policymakers navigate this complex landscape." Building on the ideas of Professor Hyun Song Shin, Mr. Liikanen offered following three observations:
- Policymakers need to decide how much to encourage big tech to enter finance—should policies promote the entry of big techs or restrict it.
- Big tech tests the regulatory perimeters of data protection, competition policy, and now financial regulation. As such, regulation that is fit-for-purpose will require enhanced cooperation among multiple regulatory bodies. The entry of big tech into financial services requires cooperation of different regulators. Joined-up thinking is essential to achieving a regulatory environment fit for purpose.
- There is a need to recognize the cross-border nature of the big tech and fintech challenge and respond appropriately.
He concluded that innovation is here to stay and it will bring both benefits and challenges. However, a balanced approach is needed to reap the benefits of financial inclusion and efficiency and ensure a level playing field between big techs and banks.
Keywords: International, Banking, Big Tech, Fintech, Financial Innovation, Financial Inclusion, BIS, IFRS
Previous ArticleESRB Updates National Macro-Prudential Measures in November 2019
Next ArticleFDIC Reports Analyze Growth of Nonbank Lending in US
FDIC is seeking comments on a rule to amend the interagency guidelines for real estate lending policies—also known as the Real Estate Lending Standards.
ISDA is consulting on the implementation of fallbacks for the sterling LIBOR ICE Swap Rate and for the USD LIBOR ICE Swap Rate.
BIS and BoE launched the BIS Innovation Hub Center in London, which is the fourth new Innovation Hub Centre to be opened in the past two years.
ESRB published recommendations on the reciprocation of macro-prudential measures in Belgium, France, Luxembourg, Norway, and Sweden.
SEC announced that the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs released the Spring 2021 Unified Agenda of Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions.
EC published the Delegated Regulation 2021/931, which supplements the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR or Regulation 575/2013) with regard to the regulatory technical standards specifying the method for identifying derivative transactions with one or more than one material risk driver.
BCBS is consulting on preliminary proposals for the prudential treatment of cryptoasset exposures of banks.
EBA issued a revised list of validation rules under the implementing technical standards on supervisory reporting.
BIS Innovation Hub, BDF, and SNB announced that, together with a private-sector consortium led by Accenture, they will conduct an experiment using wholesale central bank digital currency (wCBDC) for cross-border settlement.
ESAs published two amended implementing technical standards on the mapping of credit assessments of External Credit Assessment Institutions (ECAIs).