ESAs published joint draft regulatory technical standards to amend the Delegated Regulation on the risk mitigation techniques for non-cleared over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives (bilateral margining) as well as a joint statement on the introduction of fallbacks in OTC derivative contracts and the requirement to exchange collateral. The regulatory technical standards and the statement were developed to facilitate further international consistency in the implementation of the global framework agreed by BCBS and IOSCO. ESAs have developed these regulatory standards under Article 11(15) of European Market Infrastructure Regulation or EMIR (EU No 648/2012).
In view of the clarifications and changes of the global framework made over the past months by BCBS and IOSCO, the report and related regulatory standards clarify the expectations in relation to the threshold above which initial margin is expected to be exchanged and introduce a further phase-in of one year for smaller counterparties in scope for the initial margin requirements. Taking into account the global progress toward implementation of the international framework as well as the risks that BCBS and IOSCO framework was developed to address, a few amendments have been included in relation to the treatment of physically settled foreign-exchange forward and swap contracts, intragroup contracts, and equity option contracts.
The statement by ESAs clarifies the view of ESAs that amendments made to outstanding uncleared OTC derivative contracts for the sole purpose of introducing such fallbacks should not create new obligations on these legacy contracts. With regard to the statement in relation to fallbacks, ESAs believe it useful to ensure legal certainty on this issue, in case or to the extent this is not already provided in some jurisdictions. ESAs are mindful of the efforts that counterparties continue to undertake to introduce fallbacks in their legacy OTC derivative contracts across all asset classes. Therefore, while further legal certainty is expected on this via a legislative change, ESAs do not expect competent authorities to
- Prioritize their supervisory actions toward margining requirements arising as a result of the introduction of fallbacks in legacy uncleared OTC derivative contracts
- Generally apply their risk-based supervisory powers in their day-to-day enforcement of applicable legislation in this area in a proportionate manner
ESAs are submitting the draft technical standards, presented in the Annex to final report, to EC for endorsement in the form of a Commission Delegated Regulation. Following the endorsement, they will then be subject to non-objection by the European Parliament and the Council. Post that, the Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Securities, Insurance, Bilateral Margin Requirements, Regulatory Technical Standards, OTC Derivatives, Fallback, EMIR, ESAs, BCBS, IOSCO
Previous ArticleFASB Publishes Summary of Emerging Issues Task Force Meeting
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) found that Heritage Bank Limited had incorrectly reported capital because of weaknesses in operational risk and compliance frameworks, although the bank did not breach minimum prudential capital ratios at any point and remains well-capitalized.
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) released the annual report for 2020-2021.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published, along with a summary of its response to the consultation feedback, an information paper that summarizes the finalized capital framework that is in line with the internationally agreed Basel III requirements for banks.
The Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) issued a consultative report focusing on access to central counterparty (CCP) clearing and client-position portability.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) released the final Prudential Practice Guide on management of climate change financial risks (CPG 229) for banks, insurers, and superannuation trustees.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) Single Rulebook Question and Answer (Q&A) tool updates for this month include answers to 10 questions.
The European Commission, or EC, finalized the Implementing Regulation 2021/2017 with respect to the benchmark portfolios, reporting templates, and reporting instructions for the supervisory benchmarking of internal approaches for calculating own funds requirements.
The European Commission (EC) has adopted a package of measures related to the Capital Markets Union.
The European Council adopted its position on two proposals that are part of the digital finance package adopted by the European Commission in September 2020, with one of the proposals involving the regulation on markets in crypto-assets (MiCA) and the other involving the Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA).
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) is proposing, via the consultation paper CP21/21, to apply group provisions in the Operational Resilience Part of the PRA Rulebook (relevant for the Capital Requirements Regulation or CRR firms) to holding companies.