ISDA has submitted a letter to the Official Sector Steering Group (FSB OSSG) of FSB on the pre-cessation triggers for derivative fallbacks. The communication is in response to a letter sent by the FSB OSSG to ISDA in November 2019. ISDA recognizes the importance of both scenarios outlined by FSB OSSG—the permanent cessation of a key Interbank Offered Rate (IBOR) and a determination by the UK FCA that LIBOR is no longer representative of the underlying market but continues to be published. ISDA remains fully focused on the timely delivery of a fallback solution to prevent the systemic disruption that could occur if LIBOR or another key IBOR ceases.
As the work on permanent cessation fallbacks will be finalized, ISDA will simultaneously work with regulators and the industry to increase market understanding of the implications of a “non-representative” LIBOR and will attempt to build a consensus on how to implement the pre-cessation fallbacks, in line with the FSB OSSG’s request. To further increase market understanding, ISDA believes it is critical that market participants also receive further clarity on the following:
- A statement from UK FCA and ICE Benchmark Administration that the “reasonable period” during which a “non-representative” LIBOR would be published would be minimal after FCA announces that LIBOR is no longer representative.
- A public and definitive confirmation directly from the central counterparties (CCPs) clearing LIBOR derivatives or their regulatory supervisor.
In light of the feedback received in the pre-cessation consultation, the strategy described in the November 2019 letter would require ISDA to re-consult with the market on a single documentation approach and engage with relevant competition authorities. ISDA highlighted that it is prepared to do so once the market has the benefit of appropriate clarity on the issues described above. If a strong majority of market participants supports a “non-representativeness” pre-cessation fallback trigger for LIBOR derivatives in response to the consultation, then ISDA would work to implement pre-cessation fallbacks—either along with the documentation for permanent cessation fallbacks or as a second step to complement the permanent cessation fallbacks. In any event, ISDA will offer standard language for a “non-representativeness” pre-cessation fallback trigger that market participants could use.
ISDA is on track to finalize the substantive portion of its work to develop permanent cessation fallbacks by the end of 2019 and to facilitate implementation during the first half of 2020. On November 15, 2019, ISDA released the results of a third successful industry consultation on the adjustment methodologies for permanent cessation fallbacks rates. ISDA will shortly issue a brief supplemental consultation to confirm the suitability of these adjustments for fallbacks in derivatives referencing euro LIBOR and EURIBOR. On completion of this consultation in the first quarter of 2020, ISDA will publish the Supplement to the 2006 ISDA Definitions containing the fallbacks and will open, for adherence, a protocol to include these fallbacks in existing derivatives. The amendments to new and existing derivatives contracts will take effect approximately three months later, in the second quarter of 2020. Based on feedback and support from market participants, ISDA believes that the new documentation will provide a critical backstop in contracts that continue to reference LIBOR or another key IBOR if and when that IBOR ceases.
Keywords: International, Banking, Securities, LIBOR, IBOR, Pre-cessation Triggers, Interest Rate Benchmarks, Derivatives, Fallback, FCA, FSB, ISDA
Previous ArticleEC and MAS Adopt Equivalence Decision for Derivative Trading Venues
The U.S. regulators recently released baseline and severely adverse scenarios, along with other details, for stress testing the banks in 2024. The relevant U.S. banking regulators are the Federal Reserve Bank (FED), the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC).
The regulatory landscape for artificial intelligence (AI), including the generative kind, is evolving rapidly, with governments and regulators aiming to address the challenges and opportunities presented by this transformative technology.
The European Union (EU) has been working on the final elements of Basel III standards, with endorsement of the Banking Package and the publication of the European Banking Authority (EBA) roadmap on Basel III implementation in December 2023.
The European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG), which plays a crucial role in shaping corporate reporting standards in European Union (EU), is seeking comments, until May 21, 2024, on the Exposure Draft ESRS for listed SMEs.
Banking regulators worldwide are increasingly focusing on addressing, monitoring, and supervising the institutions' exposure to climate and environmental risks.
The use cases of generative AI in the banking sector are evolving fast, with many institutions adopting the technology to enhance customer service and operational efficiency.
As part of the increasing regulatory focus on operational resilience, cyber risk stress testing is also becoming a crucial aspect of ensuring bank resilience in the face of cyber threats.
A few years down the road from the last global financial crisis, regulators are still issuing rules and monitoring banks to ensure that they comply with the regulations.
The European Commission (EC) recently issued an update informing that the European Council and the Parliament have endorsed the Banking Package implementing the final elements of Basel III standards
The Swiss Federal Council recently decided to further develop the Swiss Climate Scores, which it had first launched in June 2022.