ISDA Response Letter to FSB on Pre-Cessation Triggers for Derivatives
ISDA has submitted a letter to the Official Sector Steering Group (FSB OSSG) of FSB on the pre-cessation triggers for derivative fallbacks. The communication is in response to a letter sent by the FSB OSSG to ISDA in November 2019. ISDA recognizes the importance of both scenarios outlined by FSB OSSG—the permanent cessation of a key Interbank Offered Rate (IBOR) and a determination by the UK FCA that LIBOR is no longer representative of the underlying market but continues to be published. ISDA remains fully focused on the timely delivery of a fallback solution to prevent the systemic disruption that could occur if LIBOR or another key IBOR ceases.
As the work on permanent cessation fallbacks will be finalized, ISDA will simultaneously work with regulators and the industry to increase market understanding of the implications of a “non-representative” LIBOR and will attempt to build a consensus on how to implement the pre-cessation fallbacks, in line with the FSB OSSG’s request. To further increase market understanding, ISDA believes it is critical that market participants also receive further clarity on the following:
- A statement from UK FCA and ICE Benchmark Administration that the “reasonable period” during which a “non-representative” LIBOR would be published would be minimal after FCA announces that LIBOR is no longer representative.
- A public and definitive confirmation directly from the central counterparties (CCPs) clearing LIBOR derivatives or their regulatory supervisor.
In light of the feedback received in the pre-cessation consultation, the strategy described in the November 2019 letter would require ISDA to re-consult with the market on a single documentation approach and engage with relevant competition authorities. ISDA highlighted that it is prepared to do so once the market has the benefit of appropriate clarity on the issues described above. If a strong majority of market participants supports a “non-representativeness” pre-cessation fallback trigger for LIBOR derivatives in response to the consultation, then ISDA would work to implement pre-cessation fallbacks—either along with the documentation for permanent cessation fallbacks or as a second step to complement the permanent cessation fallbacks. In any event, ISDA will offer standard language for a “non-representativeness” pre-cessation fallback trigger that market participants could use.
ISDA is on track to finalize the substantive portion of its work to develop permanent cessation fallbacks by the end of 2019 and to facilitate implementation during the first half of 2020. On November 15, 2019, ISDA released the results of a third successful industry consultation on the adjustment methodologies for permanent cessation fallbacks rates. ISDA will shortly issue a brief supplemental consultation to confirm the suitability of these adjustments for fallbacks in derivatives referencing euro LIBOR and EURIBOR. On completion of this consultation in the first quarter of 2020, ISDA will publish the Supplement to the 2006 ISDA Definitions containing the fallbacks and will open, for adherence, a protocol to include these fallbacks in existing derivatives. The amendments to new and existing derivatives contracts will take effect approximately three months later, in the second quarter of 2020. Based on feedback and support from market participants, ISDA believes that the new documentation will provide a critical backstop in contracts that continue to reference LIBOR or another key IBOR if and when that IBOR ceases.
Related Links
Keywords: International, Banking, Securities, LIBOR, IBOR, Pre-cessation Triggers, Interest Rate Benchmarks, Derivatives, Fallback, FCA, FSB, ISDA
Previous Article
DNB Issues Additional Data Quality Checks for Fourth Quarter of 2019Related Articles
ESAs Issue Multiple Regulatory Updates for Financial Sector Entities
The three European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs) issued a letter to inform about delay in the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) mandate, along with a Call for Evidence on greenwashing practices.
ISSB Makes Announcements at COP27; IASB to Propose IFRS 9 Amendments
The International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) of the IFRS Foundations made several announcements at COP27 and with respect to its work on the sustainability standards.
IOSCO Prioritizes Green Disclosures, Greenwashing, and Carbon Markets
The International Organization for Securities Commissions (IOSCO), at COP27, outlined the regulatory priorities for sustainability disclosures, mitigation of greenwashing, and promotion of integrity in carbon markets.
EBA Finalizes Methodology for Stress Tests, Issues Other Updates
The European Banking Authority (EBA) issued a statement in the context of COP27, clarified the operationalization of intermediate EU parent undertakings (IPUs) of third-country groups
OSFI Sets Out Work Priorities and Reporting Updates for Banks
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) published an annual report on its activities, a report on forward-looking work.
APRA Finalizes Changes to Capital Framework, Issues Other Updates
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) finalized amendments to the capital framework, announced a review of the prudential framework for groups.
BIS Hub and Central Banks Conduct CBDC and DeFI Pilots
The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Innovation Hubs and several central banks are working together on various central bank digital currency (CBDC) pilots.
ECB Sets Deadline for Banks to Meet Its Climate Risk Expectations
The European Central Bank (ECB) published the results of its thematic review, which shows that banks are still far from adequately managing climate and environmental risks.
ESAs, ECB, & EC Issue Multiple Regulatory Updates for Financial Sector
Among its recent publications, the European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final standards and guidelines on interest rate risk arising from non-trading book activities (IRRBB)
EC Adopts Final Rules Under CRR, BRRD, and Crowdfunding Regulation
The European Commission (EC) recently adopted regulations with respect to the calculation of own funds requirements for market risk, the prudential treatment of global systemically important institutions (G-SIIs)
