The SRB Chair Elke König addressed the ECON Committee of the European Parliament on the status of the current priority areas for SRB and elaborated on the SRB priorities for 2020, highlighting that implementation of the Banking package will be a major priority for the months ahead. She highlighted that the Banking Package strengthens the resolution framework, but also poses implementation challenges for SRB. The key tasks on the agenda include finalization of the new Minimum Requirement for own funds and Eligible Liabilities (MREL) policy by the second quarter of 2020, finalization of the European Deposit Insurance Scheme during this parliamentary term, continued progress toward resolvability assessment, and finding a solution for liquidity in resolution.
The building up of MREL is very important for resolution planning; therefore, SRB has taken a gradual, multi-year approach to MREL, with the goal of maintaining proportionality in the system while preserving a level playing field and upholding high resolution standards across the Banking Union. In the last two resolution planning cycles, SRB has taken binding MREL decisions at consolidated and individual levels. By the end of 2019, SRB will have adopted decisions with MREL targets at the consolidated level for approximately 83% of the banks with resolution plans. Even though the revised Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive (BRRD2) and the Single Resolution Mechanism Regulation (SRMR2) only kick in from December 28, 2020, SRB has already advanced in revising its MREL policy with a view to discuss new policy elements with the participants of the Single Resolution Mechanism and with a view to consulting the industry in early 2020. The goal is to have the new MREL policy ready by the second quarter of 2020. This would allow SRB to start applying it in the course of the 2020 resolution planning cycle and to take MREL decisions based on the new legal framework in the first or second quarter of 2021, when SRMR2 will be applicable and when member states should have transposed the BRRD2.
The SRB Chair pointed out that the new legislation is complex and the resulting framework not only requires banks to continue on their path toward resolvability, but also to follow stricter rules for MREL. The new framework requires firmer conditions for instruments to be considered MREL-eligible; requires a number of banks to meet higher subordination requirements; and calls for banking groups to comply with the internal MREL requirements. SRB is working with the national resolution authorities and is in touch with EC, ECB, and EBA. However, recent experience shows that it will inevitably take some time for authorities to overcome the interpretation and implementation issues. This is another argument for the step-by-step introduction of the new framework, since it is already clear that the level two texts of EBA will be delayed.
Another challenging task that is very high on the SRB agenda is the resolvability assessment. Based on these ongoing efforts, SRB is revising its internal policy on resolvability assessment, to integrate an overall consistent resolvability assessment into the upcoming resolution planning cycle for 2020. Concretely, SRB envisages the creation of a "heat-map" classifying banks in accordance with progress made on each resolvability condition and the relative impact this progress has on the feasibility of the preferred resolution strategy. An area where improvements need to be made is the need for a better alignment between resolution and insolvency, including a bank liquidation regime or harmonized license withdrawal process. She added that a solution for liquidity in resolution is still not in sight. In 2020, SRB continue to increase the Single Resolution Fund while it is hoped that the details around the backstop to the Fund can be worked out and hopefully progress can be made soon—perhaps even in tomorrow’s meeting of the EuroGroup. Finally, SRB would like to see more work to complete and strengthen the Capital Markets Union and hopes that an agreement can be reached on the European Deposit Insurance Scheme, which is the third and final pillar of the Banking Union, during this parliamentary term.
Related Link: Speech
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, BRRD, Resolvability Assessment, Banking Package, MREL, Resolution Framework, BRRD2, SRMR2, Single Resolution Fund, SRB
Previous ArticleFSB Publishes Summary of November Meeting of RCG for Europe
The three European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs) issued a letter to inform about delay in the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) mandate, along with a Call for Evidence on greenwashing practices.
The International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) of the IFRS Foundations made several announcements at COP27 and with respect to its work on the sustainability standards.
The International Organization for Securities Commissions (IOSCO), at COP27, outlined the regulatory priorities for sustainability disclosures, mitigation of greenwashing, and promotion of integrity in carbon markets.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) issued a statement in the context of COP27, clarified the operationalization of intermediate EU parent undertakings (IPUs) of third-country groups
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) published an annual report on its activities, a report on forward-looking work.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) finalized amendments to the capital framework, announced a review of the prudential framework for groups.
The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Innovation Hubs and several central banks are working together on various central bank digital currency (CBDC) pilots.
The European Central Bank (ECB) published the results of its thematic review, which shows that banks are still far from adequately managing climate and environmental risks.
Among its recent publications, the European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final standards and guidelines on interest rate risk arising from non-trading book activities (IRRBB)
The European Commission (EC) recently adopted regulations with respect to the calculation of own funds requirements for market risk, the prudential treatment of global systemically important institutions (G-SIIs)