The European Banking Authority (EBA) launched three consultations on technical aspects of the revised framework capturing interest rate risks for banking book (IRRBB) positions, with the comment period ending on April 04, 2022. The proposals pertain to the draft regulatory technical standards on the IRRBB standardized approach; the draft guidelines on IRRBB and credit spread risk arising from non-trading book activities (CSRBB); and the draft regulatory technical standards on the IRRBB supervisory outlier test. These draft regulatory technical standards and guidelines have been developed on the basis of Article 84(5), 84(6), and 98(5a) of the Capital Requirements Directive or CRD.
The regulatory technical standards on the IRRBB standardized approach specify criteria for the evaluation of IRRBB in case a competent authority decides its application in view of a non-satisfactory IRRBB internal system. The proposed draft regulatory standards specify standardized and simplified standardized methodologies to evaluate the risks arising from potential changes in interest rates that affect both the economic value of equity and the net interest income of an institution’s non-trading book activities in accordance with 84(5) of the Capital Requirements Directive (2013/36/EU). The simplified standardized approach reflects the generally less advanced capacities of smaller and non-complex institutions. To harmonize the calculation, EBA has specified common definitions, components, and steps for institutions to apply, which lead to estimates comparing the economic value of equity and net interest income between a baseline scenario and an interest rate shock scenario. Three main components are identified to estimate the level of net interest income within a given horizon: the aggregation of interest rate payments that are already fixed, the projection of risk-free yield, and the projection of commercial margin for repricing cash flows. To project risk-free yield with appropriate forward rates, additional slotting is needed based on original maturity. Additional components take into account automatic optionality and basis risk. Where possible, these proposals are based on the standardized methodology published by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision in April 2016 as well as the practices established in the EBA Guidelines (EBA/GL/2018/02) on the management of interest rate risk arising from non-trading book activities from July 18, 2018.
The guidelines on IRRBB and CSRBB will replace the current guidelines on technical aspects of the management of interest rate risk arising from non-trading activities under the supervisory review process published in 2018. The updated guidelines provide continuity to the current ones and include new aspects of the mandate. In particular, they specify the criteria to identify non-satisfactory internal models for IRRBB management and identify specific criteria to assess and monitor CSRBB. The draft guidelines specify aspects of the identification, evaluation, management and mitigation of the risks arising from potential changes in interest rates and of the assessment and monitoring of credit spread risk, of institutions’ non-trading book activities. EBA is mandated to specify in these guidelines additional criteria for the assessment and monitoring by institutions of their credit spread risk arising from their non-trading book activities (CSRBB). The draft guidelines provide a definition and the scope of application of CSRBB. They contain dedicated sections for CSRBB with specific provisions on the identification, assessment, and monitoring of CSRBB. Finally, the amended mandate requests the inclusion of criteria for determining whether the internal systems implemented by institutions for the purpose of evaluating IRRBB are not satisfactory, in which case a competent authority may require an institution to use the standardized methodology. After some general provisions, the new guidelines contain separate specific chapters for IRRBB and for CSRBB. The guidelines are broadly consistent with the Basel standards with some further elaborated sections following the Capital Requirements Directive mandate, particularly on CSRBB assessment and monitoring and non-satisfactory IRRBB internal systems.
The regulatory technical standards on IRRBB supervisory outlier tests specify the supervisory shock scenarios as well as the criteria to evaluate if there is a large decline in the net interest income or in the economic value of equity that could trigger supervisory measures. The draft standards take into account the current low interest rate environment, for example, in the determination of a post-shock interest rate floor. The draft regulatory standards specify supervisory shock scenarios, common modeling and parametric assumptions, and what constitutes a large decline for the calculation of the economic value of equity and of the net interest income in accordance with Article 98(5a) of the Capital Requirements Directive, In the Directive, a supervisory outlier test is envisaged to identify institutions of which, in the context of a shock scenario, the economic value of equity declines by more than 15% of their Tier 1 capital or their net interest income experiences a large decline. If any of these limits are breached, competent authorities, unless they consider notwithstanding the breach that the institution’s IRRBB management is adequate and that it is not excessively exposed to IRRBB, shall exercise their supervisory powers like setting additional own funds requirements, limitations of activities with excessive risks, specifying modeling and parametric assumptions, among others established in the Directive. As per its mandate the draft regulatory technical standards are inspired on the internationally agreed Basel standards.
- Press Release
- Proposed Standardized Approach (PDF)
- Proposed Guidelines on IRRBB and CSRBB (PDF)
- Proposal on Outlier Tests (PDF)
Comment Due Date: April 04, 2022
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Basel, Standardized Approach, Regulatory Technical Standards, Regulatory Capital, IRRBB, Interest Rate Risk, CSRBB, Supervisory Outlier Tests, Shock Scenarios, Simplified Standardized Approach, CRD, EBA
The three European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs) issued a letter to inform about delay in the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) mandate, along with a Call for Evidence on greenwashing practices.
The Financial Stability Board (FSB) and the Network for Greening the Financial System (NGFS) published a joint report that outlines the initial findings from climate scenario analyses undertaken by financial authorities to assess climate-related financial risks.
The Financial Stability Board (FSB) published a letter intended for the G20 leaders, highlighting the work that it will undertake under the Indian G20 Presidency in 2023 to strengthen resilience of the financial system.
The International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) of the IFRS Foundations made several announcements at COP27 and with respect to its work on the sustainability standards.
The International Organization for Securities Commissions (IOSCO), at COP27, outlined the regulatory priorities for sustainability disclosures, mitigation of greenwashing, and promotion of integrity in carbon markets.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) issued a statement in the context of COP27, clarified the operationalization of intermediate EU parent undertakings (IPUs) of third-country groups
The European Union has finalized and published, in the Official Journal of the European Union, a set of 13 Delegated and Implementing Regulations applicable to the European crowdfunding service providers.
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) published an annual report on its activities, a report on forward-looking work.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) finalized amendments to the capital framework, announced a review of the prudential framework for groups.
The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Innovation Hubs and several central banks are working together on various central bank digital currency (CBDC) pilots.