EBA published an Opinion in response to the EC intention to amend the final draft regulatory technical standards on the specification of the nature, severity, and duration of an economic downturn under the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR). These standards are to be taken into account for the estimation of loss given default (LGD) appropriate for an economic downturn and for the estimation of conversion factor (CF) appropriate for an economic downturn, where LGDs and CFs are estimated under the internal ratings-based (IRB) approach. According to EBA, several changes introduced by EC would alter the agreed policy. Therefore, EBA is suggesting certain changes with the aim of maintaining the agreed consensus of the originally submitted text.
The EBA Opinion identified three substantive changes introduced by EC:
- The first one is about the deletion of the requirement, which states that the economic indicators related to one downturn period should be significantly correlated. EBA is of the view that such requirement should be re-introduced.
- The second substantive change relates to the introduction of a proportionality principle for the cost of data (Recital 10 and Article 2), which alters the agreed policy. Here, EBA suggests some redrafting to clarify the relevant data sources.
- For the third substantive change, which is about removing the possibility of considering a shorter time series than 20 years for economic indicators related to an EU member state that joined EU less than 20 years ago, EBA agrees to EC, despite the substantive nature of the change.
In addition, EBA identified a number of non-substantive and drafting changes, which, in its view, may hamper the clarity of the text. EBA is, therefore, proposing alternative drafting suggestions. The non-substantive changes include redrafting of requirement to customize economic factors to the geographical areas and sectors and deletion of Article 5, which requires annual and, if appropriate, ad hoc review of downturn periods.
In November 2018, EBA had submitted, to EC, the final draft regulatory technical standards on the specification of the nature, severity, and duration of an economic downturn in accordance with the CRR (EU Regulation No 575/2013). In its letter of July 20, 2020, EC had informed EBA of its intention to endorse the draft standards with amendments and submitted to EBA a modified version of the regulatory technical standards, with its envisaged changes. EBA has now delivered this Opinion in accordance with Article 10(1), subparagraph 6, of Regulation No 1093/2010, which requires EBA to submit its response in the form of an opinion to amendments proposed by EC.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Credit Risk, CRR, Basel, Regulatory Capital, IRB Approach, EBA
Previous ArticleDNB Publishes Several Reporting Updates for Banks in August 2020
FCA and PRA in the UK, FED in the US, and the authorities in Singapore have fined Goldman Sachs for risk management failures in connection with the 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB).
BCBS announced that OSFI and the Bank of Canada hosted the 21st International Conference of Banking Supervisors (ICBS) virtually on October 19-22, 2020.
FCA proposed guidance on how firms should continue to seek to help customers who hold insurance and premium finance products and may be in financial difficulty because of COVID-19, after October 31, 2020.
EBA issued an opinion on prudential treatment of the legacy instruments as the grandfathering period nears an end on December 31, 2021.
ESRB published the fifth issue of the EU Non-bank Financial Intermediation Risk Monitor 2020 (NBFI Monitor).
HM Treasury announced that the new Financial Services Bill has been introduced in the Parliament.
APRA announced that it has increased the minimum liquidity requirement of Bendigo and Adelaide Bank for failing to comply with the prudential standard on liquidity.
PRA published the consultation paper CP17/20 to propose changes to certain rules, supervisory statements, and statements of policy to implement elements of the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD5).
US Agencies adopted a final rule that applies to advanced approaches banking organizations and aims to reduce interconnectedness in the financial system as well as to reduce contagion risks associated with the failure of a global systemically important bank (G-SIB).
US Agencies (FDIC, FED, and OCC) adopted a final rule that implements the net stable funding ratio (NSFR) for certain large banking organizations.