The European Banking Authority (EBA) published its peer review report on the prudential assessment of qualifying holdings. The review aimed to assess the competent authorities’ application of the European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs) guidelines on the prudential assessment of the acquisition of qualifying holdings. The guidelines define common procedures based on the assessment criteria laid down in the European Union (EU) legislative framework that establishes how acquisitions and increases of qualifying holdings by natural or legal persons in financial institutions should be assessed. According to the peer review, the competent authorities have largely or fully applied the guidelines, which have significantly contributed to the convergence of assessment practices of proposed acquisition or increase of qualifying holdings across EU.
The EBA report presents the Ad hoc Peer Review Committee’s conclusions of the peer review based on the competent authorities' self-assessment of how they apply a selection of the most critical areas of the guidelines. These areas include the notion of acting in concert, significant influence, indirect qualifying holdings, assessment of completeness of the notification and time limits, financial soundness, reputation of the acquirer, and selected aspects relating to the fifth assessment criterion on money laundering/terrorist financing risk. The conclusions illustrated in the EBA report are based on the results of a self-assessment questionnaire addressed to the competent authorities rather than of a full review of the competent authorities’ application of the guidelines.
Based on the peer reviewed findings, the report indicates areas where relevant competent authorities should improve their practices rather than request enforcement measures and the Peer Review Committee reserves the right to request updates on implementation developments. The report also provides early indications as to the areas in which the ESAs guidelines could provide additional guidance to the competent authorities, with a view to fostering convergence of practices. The report also provides early indications as to the areas in which the ESAs guidelines could provide additional guidance to the competent authorities, with a view to fostering convergence of practices. In this regard, the EBA Peer Review Committee suggests that the following improvements could be included in the guidelines:
- Review and enhancement of guidance on the fifth assessment criterion related to money laundering/terrorist financing risk
- Additional guidance on the assessment of large and complex acquisitions, including by—but not limited to—special acquirers like private equity funds, with multiple direct and indirect acquirers or acquirers acting in concert, in order to achieve a more proportionate and efficient assessment. It is also acknowledged that complex transactions with numerous direct and indirect acquirers raise specific challenges for competent authorities, in particular as to the compliance with the strict time limit of two working days set out by Article 22(2) of Capital Requirements Directive (CRD IV) for the assessment of the completeness of the notification
- Review of the guidance on the application of the principle of proportionality
- Review and improvement of the guidance on the content of documents and information to be provided with an application, in order to speed up the pre-application phase, for example in respect of the expectations of the content and assessment of the business plan.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Peer Review, Qualifying Holdings, CRD IV, Basel, ML/TF Risk, Proportionality, ESAs, EBA
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) published the final policy statement PS21/21 on the leverage ratio framework in the UK. PS21/21, which sets out the final policy of both the Financial Policy Committee (FPC) and PRA
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) proposed to amend Regulation B to implement changes to the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA) under Section 1071 of the Dodd-Frank Act.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) decided to maintain, at the 2019 levels, the buffer rates for the Other Systemically Important Institutions (O-SII) for another year, with no new rates to be set until December 2023.
The Financial Stability Board (FSB) published a progress report on implementation of its high-level recommendations for the regulation, supervision, and oversight of global stablecoin arrangements.
In a letter to the authorized deposit taking institutions, the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) announced an increase in the minimum interest rate buffer it expects banks to use when assessing the serviceability of home loan applications.
The Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) are consulting on the preliminary guidance that clarifies that stablecoin arrangements should observe international standards for payment, clearing, and settlement systems.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) and the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) have set out their respective work priorities for 2022.
The Malta Financial Services Authority (MFSA) updated the guidelines on supervisory reporting requirements under the reporting framework 3.0, in addition to the reporting module on leverage under the common reporting (COREP) framework.
The European Commission (EC) published the Implementing Decision 2021/1753 on the equivalence of supervisory and regulatory requirements of certain third countries and territories for the purposes of the treatment of exposures, in accordance with the Capital Requirements Regulation or CRR (575/2013).
EC published the Implementing Regulation 2021/1751, which lays down implementing technical standards on uniform formats and templates for notification of determination of the impracticability of including contractual recognition of write-down and conversion powers.