IMF published a paper highlighting the use of some elements of the Bali Fintech Agenda in Pacific island countries, which face significant financial-structural challenges. The paper outlines technologies and policy areas relevant to the Pacific context and provides a potential action plan to help advance the policy agenda. The paper emphasizes the feasibility of adopting fintech applications in the Pacific through a coordinated regional approach, anchored by appropriate regulation and infrastructure.
The paper draws on elements of the Bali Fintech Agenda and uses fintech examples from less developed economies that might be feasible for the Pacific island countries. The Bali Fintech Agenda highlights 12 principles for policymakers to consider when formulating their approaches to fintech. The agenda aims to harness the potential of fintech while managing associated risks. The paper builds on the results of IMF research on financial inclusion showing that small states are more likely to leapfrog into new technologies. The paper first describes the state of financial development and the level of access to technology in the Pacific Island countries. It then focuses on identifying the necessary prerequisites for technology-enabled financial inclusion, including the technological and general infrastructure requirement and the regulatory and market environments. Next, the paper outlines a strategy for promoting fintech solutions in Pacific Island countries in four areas—payment systems, identification requirements, credit sharing information, and risk assessment and management. The paper concludes with key takeaways and policy recommendations.
Technological adoption requires policymakers to provide the appropriate supporting physical and regulatory infrastructure, but this is a demanding task. A regional approach to fintech applications for financial inclusion and regulatory frameworks is essential to overcome capacity and scalability constraints. Regional initiatives such as innovation hubs, regulatory sandboxes, and technological platforms would avoid duplication and harmonize policy and regulatory standards. They enable a two-way knowledge exchange between regulators and digital financial service providers. This would set the stage for the regional know-your-customer utility introduced at the 2018 South Pacific Central Bank Governors’ Meeting. These initiatives would also allow policymakers to build a market environment attractive to incumbent and new market participants.
The implementation of fintech products and services will face risks and constraints that need to be factored into the implementation and risk mitigation strategy. Policymakers should conduct a comprehensive assessment of risks by type and nature to decide how to absorb, control, or mitigate them. The risk assessment forms the foundation of a risk-mitigation strategy, which will help guide policymakers in determining appropriate action items. The paper highlights that work needs to be done in the areas of cyber-security, market, and operational risks. Regulators and institutions in Pacific island countries could be at a disadvantage in coping with the growing risks of cyber threats. The gap between regulatory priorities and knowledge is highest for cyber-security and technological tools for regulation and supervision. This knowledge gap could translate into weaker capacity to confront attacks and fraud, thus increasing Pacific island economies’ exposure to cyber-security risks. Regional approaches are needed to ensure that regulators and supervisors in Pacific island countries can adopt strong controls and overcome resource and skill constraints.
Related Link: IMF Paper
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Banking, Pacific Island, Fintech, Bali Fintech Agenda, Risk Assessment, Regtech, Cyber Risk, IMF
Previous ArticleSNB Amends Form for Reporting Solvency Risk of Counterparties
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published four draft principles to support supervisory efforts in assessing the representativeness of COVID-19-impacted data for banks using the internal ratings based (IRB) credit risk models.
The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Innovation Hub updated its work program, announcing a set of projects across various centers.
Certain members of the U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs issued a letter to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) published a consultation paper on the advice on the review of the securitization prudential framework in Solvency II.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) issued a statement on PRA buffer adjustment while the Bank of England (BoE) published a notice on the statistical reporting requirements for banks.
The Federal Financial Supervisory Authority of Germany (BaFin) proposed to amend the “Capital Investment Conduct And Organization Ordinance” and issued a draft circular on the minimum resolvability requirements for resolution planning.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) proposed guidelines, for the resolution authorities, on the publication of the write-down and conversion and bail-in exchange mechanic, with the comment period ending on September 07, 2022.
The Financial Services Authority of Indonesia (OJK) is strengthening cooperation with the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) and the Japanese Financial Services Agency (JFSA)
The European Parliament and the Council published Regulation 2022/868 on European data governance (Data Governance Act).
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published phase 2 of its reporting framework 3.2. The technical package supports the implementation of the updated reporting framework by providing standard specifications