ESMA Proposes Improvements to Third Country Benchmarks Regime
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) published its response to the European Commission consultation on the regime applicable to the use of benchmarks administered in a third country. In its response, ESMA comments on the functioning of the current regime and proposes improvements to the regulatory and supervisory framework as well as the European Union (EU) benchmark labels.
The Benchmarks Regulation entered into application on January 01, 2018. The third country benchmarks are still under a grace period until December 31, 2023 (with a possible extension until December 31, 2025) where the use, in EU, of third country benchmarks not yet compliant with the Benchmarks Regulation is permitted. Currently the Benchmarks Regulation envisages two options for third country administrators willing to apply in EU; recognition (whereby ESMA is the competent authority responsible for the recognition and supervision of third country administrators) or endorsement (whereby national competent authorities are responsible for the endorsement and supervision of third country benchmarks). Pursuant to Article 54(6) of the Benchmarks Regulation, the European Commission should review the Benchmarks Regulation and submit a report to the European Parliament and to the Council by June 15, 2023. The consultation covers the topics of the continued use by supervised entities of third country benchmarks and the potential shortcomings of the current framework.
In its response to the consultation, ESMA opines that the
- restrictions on the use of third country benchmarks should be removed following a risk-based approach while ensuring a level playing field between EU and third country administrators.
- proposal to create a new category of ‘strategic’ benchmarks is supported by ESMA; this category would be the only category of benchmarks subject to mandatory restrictions of use, similar to the current rules.
- introduction of an EU ESG benchmark label would be an extra supporting tool against greenwashing.
ESMA emphasizes that while the Benchmarks Regulation covers a wide range of benchmarks used in the EU, so far very few jurisdictions have followed a similar regulatory approach regarding the provision and use of benchmarks. Therefore, the wide scope of the Benchmarks Regulation would lead to the undesirable outcome of limited availability of third country benchmarks to EU investors as opposed to their non-EU peers. The response has been submitted to the European Commission, which will prepare a report with recommendations on the effectiveness of the Benchmarks Regulation to the European Parliament and Council.
Related Links
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Securities, Insurance, Benchmarks Regime, ESG Benchmarks, ESG, Third Country Benchmarks, ESMA
Featured Experts
Michael Denton, PhD, PE
Dr. Denton provides industry leadership in the quantification of sustainability issues, climate risk, trade credit and emerging lending risks. His deep foundations in market and credit risk provide critical perspectives on how climate/sustainability risks can be measured, communicated and used to drive commercial opportunities, policy, strategy, and compliance. He supports corporate clients and financial institutions in leveraging Moody’s tools and capabilities to improve decision-making and compliance capabilities, with particular focus on the energy, agriculture and physical commodities industries.
Related Articles
US Agencies Issue Several Regulatory and Reporting Updates
The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (FED) adopted the final rule on Adjustable Interest Rate (LIBOR) Act.
ECB Issues Multiple Reports and Regulatory Updates for Banks
The European Central Bank (ECB) published an updated list of supervised entities, a report on the supervision of less significant institutions (LSIs), a statement on macro-prudential policy.
HKMA Keeps List of D-SIBs Unchanged, Makes Other Announcements
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) published a circular on the prudential treatment of crypto-asset exposures, an update on the status of transition to new interest rate benchmarks.
EU Issues FAQs on Taxonomy Regulation, Rules Under CRD, FICOD and SFDR
The European Commission (EC) adopted the standards addressing supervisory reporting of risk concentrations and intra-group transactions, benchmarking of internal approaches, and authorization of credit institutions.
CBIRC Revises Measures on Corporate Governance Supervision
The China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission (CBIRC) issued rules to manage the risk of off-balance sheet business of commercial banks and rules on corporate governance of financial institutions.
HKMA Publications Address Sustainability Issues in Financial Sector
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) made announcements to address sustainability issues in the financial sector.
EBA Updates Address Basel and NPL Requirements for Banks
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published regulatory standards on identification of a group of connected clients (GCC) as well as updated the lists of identified financial conglomerates.
ESMA Publishes 2022 ESEF XBRL Taxonomy and Conformance Suite
The General Board of the European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB), at its December meeting, issued an updated risk assessment via the quarterly risk dashboard and held discussions on key policy priorities to address the systemic risks in the European Union.
FCA Sets up ESG Committee, Imposes Penalties, and Issues Other Updates
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) is seeking comments, until December 21, 2022, on the draft guidance for firms to support existing mortgage borrowers.
FSB Reports Assess NBFI Sector and Progress on LIBOR Transition
The Financial Stability Board (FSB) published a report that assesses progress on the transition from the Interbank Offered Rates, or IBORs, to overnight risk-free rates as well as a report that assesses global trends in the non-bank financial intermediation (NBFI) sector.
