RBNZ Extends Timeline for Concessionary Treatment of Loan Deferrals
RBNZ announced an extension of the regulatory guidance on the concessionary application of prudential capital requirements to loan repayment deferrals. The extension takes effect from when the existing guidance expires on September 27, 2020 and will apply until March 31, 2021. The revised regulatory guidance covers both new applications for loan deferrals and extensions of loan deferrals granted since the beginning of the program. The Annex to the letter provides details about the application of guidance under the relevant provisions of the Banking Supervision Handbook. RBNZ is considering whether to require additional data reporting from lenders with respect to the deferred loans and will be in contact with the industry during August to further discuss this.
The extended guidance will allow banks to treat loans deferred under the program as performing (non-defaulted), provided they were not otherwise recorded as in arrears, on a watchlist or impaired in any way at February 29, 2020. RBNZ considers the standard regulatory settings, as reflected in the existing text of the Banking Supervision Handbook, to be appropriate in the medium term. These settings will resume once the guidance expires on March 31, 2021. RBNZ expects lenders to only approve an extension or new loan deferral where there is a need for it and a benefit to the borrower and where the lender assesses that there is a reasonable prospect of that customer resuming payments when the deferral period ends. RBNZ does not anticipate that banks will need to carry out new valuations of security as part of this process, although such an approach may be needed in some cases where loans are being restructured. There are other regulatory obligations that lenders must consider in granting new or extended deferrals to customers. For example, lenders have obligations under the Credit Contracts and Consumer Finance Act and the Responsible Lending Code.
RBNZ announcement also states that the government has approved an extension to the addendum to the Responsible Lending Code introduced in response to COVID-19. The addendum has been extended until March 31, 2021 and aligns with the updated regulatory guidance. Furthermore, RBNZ recognizes that lenders will need to follow IFRS 9 accounting rules for loan provisioning. Till date, there have been varying levels of reasonable and supportable information regarding the correct treatment of loan provisions in the context of COVID-19, but the extent of this is becoming clearer over time. RBNZ will continue to monitor developments in this area. Loan deferrals may have an impact on loan-to-value ratios of borrowers. RBNZ has removed loan-to-value restrictions for 12 months starting from May 01, 2020. Therefore, no loan-to-value restrictions are associated with eligibility for loan repayment deferrals in the period up to March 31, 2021. To support the extension of the loan deferral arrangements, RBNZ has also decided that mortgages impacted by the temporary deferral can be included in Internal Residential Mortgage Backed Securities loan pools, subject to certain requirements.
Related Links
Keywords: Asia Pacific, New Zealand, Banking, COVID-19, SME, Regulatory Capital, Credit Risk, IFRS 9, Payment Deferrals, Basel, Loan-to-Value-Ratio, Reporting, RBNZ
Featured Experts
María Cañamero
Skilled market researcher; growth strategist; successful go-to-market campaign developer
Nicolas Degruson
Works with financial institutions, regulatory experts, business analysts, product managers, and software engineers to drive regulatory solutions across the globe.
Anna Krayn
CECL adoption expert; engagement manager for loss estimation, internal risk capability enhancement, and counterparty credit risk management
Previous Article
BOT Announces First Transaction Using Thai Overnight Repurchase RateRelated Articles
FINMA Approves Merger of Credit Suisse and UBS
The Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (FINMA) has approved the takeover of Credit Suisse by UBS.
BOE Sets Out Its Thinking on Regulatory Capital and Climate Risks
The Bank of England (BOE) published a working paper that aims to understand the climate-related disclosures of UK financial institutions.
OSFI Finalizes on Climate Risk Guideline, Issues Other Updates
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) is seeking comments, until May 31, 2023, on the draft guideline on culture and behavior risk, with final guideline expected by the end of 2023.
APRA Assesses Macro-Prudential Policy Settings, Issues Other Updates
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published an information paper that assesses its macro-prudential policy settings aimed at promoting stability at a systemic level.
BIS Paper Examines Impact of Greenhouse Gas Emissions on Lending
BIS issued a paper that investigates the effect of the greenhouse gas, or GHG, emissions of firms on bank loans using bank–firm matched data of Japanese listed firms from 2006 to 2018.
HMT Mulls Alignment of Ring-Fencing and Resolution Regimes for Banks
The HM Treasury (HMT) is seeking evidence, until May 07, 2023, on practicalities of aligning the ring-fencing and the banking resolution regimes for banks.
MFSA Sets Out Supervisory Priorities, Issues Reporting Updates
The Malta Financial Services Authority (MFSA) outlined its supervisory priorities for 2023
German Regulators Issue Multiple Reporting Updates for Banks
Deutsche Bundesbank published the nationally deactivated validation rules for the German Commercial Code (HGB) users on the taxonomy 3.2, which became valid from December 31, 2022
BCBS Report Examines Impact of Basel III Framework for Banks
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) published results of the Basel III monitoring exercise based on the June 30, 2022 data.
PRA Consults on Prudential Rules for "Simpler-Regime" Firms
Among the recent regulatory updates from UK authorities, a key development is the first-phase consultation, from the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA), on simplifications to the prudential framework that would apply to the simpler-regime firms.
