Featured Product

    IMF Paper Studies Metrics to Assess Vulnerabilities in Banking Sector

    August 16, 2019

    IMF published a working paper that measures the performance of different metrics in assessing banking system vulnerabilities. The study finds that metrics based on equity market valuations of bank capital are better than regulatory capital ratios and other metrics in spotting banks that failed. The paper proposes that these market-based ratios could be used as a surveillance tool to assess vulnerabilities in the banking sector.

    The approach of the study presented in this paper was to test and calibrate different metrics using the banks that both failed and survived the global financial crisis. The out of sample performance of these metrics was then assessed using the banks that have since run into trouble (as well as those that have continued operating). The results show how the metrics can be implemented in practice and what they suggest about the risk of bank failures in the current environment. The paper has confirmed results of certain previous studies, which suggest that equity market-based capital ratios would have been better at signaling bank distress in the run-up to the global financial crisis than regulatory capital ratios—particularly the tier 1 capital ratio. In addition, the study tested the market-based capital ratios against other market and balance sheet indicators and found that the market-based capital ratios would have been better at predicting bank stress than these other metrics in the pre-crisis period. The analysis showed that the market-based capital ratios also performed well in the post-crisis period. This further supports the case for using these augmented capital ratios in assessing vulnerabilities in the banking sector.

    The equity market-based capital ratios suggest there are still vulnerabilities in euro area banks, some years after the end of the euro area crisis. Additionally, there are some banks in the Asia-Pacific and Other European regions that are flagged by these metrics. These measures inevitably provide a somewhat fuzzy signal, where one can expect false alarms and perhaps overshooting in its predictions in periods of market turbulence. They also do not provide a sense of exactly when problems might arise in banks and may only provide a few months, or even weeks, of advance warning of distress. They are also, obviously, only available for banks that are traded on stock markets. However, these metrics are a valuable surveillance tool for financial stability authorities assessing vulnerabilities in the banking sector.

     

    Related Link: Working Paper

    Keywords: International, Banking, Regulatory Capital, Market-based Ratios, Tier 1 Capital, Stress Testing, Capital Ratios, Research, IMF

    Featured Experts
    Related Articles
    News

    UK Regulators Announce Measures to Address Impact of COVID-19

    UK Regulatory Authorities published statements and guidance addressed to financial entities on dealing with the impact of the coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak.

    March 26, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    ISDA and Industry Request Delay in Timeline for Initial Margin Rules

    Considering the challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic, ISDA submitted a letter on behalf of 21 industry associations and their members requesting BCBS, IOSCO, and global regulators to suspend the current timeline for the initial margin phase-in.

    March 26, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FCA, FRC, and PRA Issue Joint Statement to Address Impact of COVID-19

    In response to the COVID-19 outbreak, FCA, the Financial Reporting Council (FRC), and PRA have announced a series of actions and made statements to support the continued functioning of capital markets in the UK.

    March 26, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EC Rule Corrects Regulation Supplementing Solvency II Directive

    EC published the EU Delegated Regulation 2020/442, which corrects the EU Delegated Regulation 2015/35 that supplements Solvency II Directive (2009/138/EC).

    March 26, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FED and FFIEC Offer Reporting Relief to Institutions Due to COVID-19

    FED and FFIEC announced regulatory reporting relief to financial institutions due to disruptions caused by the COVID-19.

    March 26, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EBA and ESMA Clarify Accounting Implications of COVID-19 Measures

    EBA and ESMA issued statements to address certain accounting implications of the economic support and relief measures adopted by EU member states in response to the COVID-19 crisis.

    March 25, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    IOSCO and Securities Regulators Coordinate Responses to COVID-19

    IOSCO members are cooperating closely on their responses to the COVID-19-related disruption in capital markets.

    March 25, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    US Agencies Issue Interim MMLF Rule, FED Updates FR Y-14 Forms

    In an effort to mitigate the impact of economic disruptions due to the COVID-19 outbreak, Money Market Mutual Fund Liquidity Facility (MMLF) was launched in the US to enhance the liquidity and functioning of money markets and to support the economy.

    March 25, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    ESRB Updates List of Countercyclical Capital Buffers in March 2020

    ESRB updated the list of countercyclical capital buffer (CCyB) rates applicable in countries in the Eurosystem.

    March 24, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FHFA Amends Stress Testing Rule for Regulated Entities

    FHFA adopted a final rule that amends the stress testing rule, in line with section 401 of the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection (EGRRCP) Act.

    March 24, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 4890