IASB (or the Board) has added the second phase of its project focused on potential financial reporting implications linked to the interest rate benchmark reform—interbank offer rate (IBOR) reform—to its work plan. Phase one of the project focuses on financial reporting issues in the period before the current interest rate benchmark is replaced with an alternative rate, while phase two focuses on potential issues that might affect financial reporting once the existing rate is replaced with an alternative rate.
As part of the work on the interest rate benchmark reform, the technical staff at IASB has started to analyze the issues to be considered as part of phase two. The Board will start deliberations on these matters during the third quarter of 2019. Under phase one of the interest rate benchmark reform, IASB, in May 2019, had published an Exposure Draft that proposes exceptions to specific hedge accounting requirements in IFRS 9 and IAS 39. The Board met on July 25, 2019 to discuss the staff’s analysis of feedback on the phase one Exposure Draft, which proposes amendments to IFRS 9 and IAS 39. The Board is considering comments received on this Exposure Draft and aims to finalize the amendments as soon as possible.
Interest rate benchmarks such as IBORs play an important role in global financial markets. These benchmarks index a wide variety of financial products worth trillions of dollars and other currencies, ranging from mortgages to derivatives. Some jurisdictions have already made clear progress toward replacing existing benchmarks with the alternative, nearly risk-free rates. This work has, in turn, led to uncertainty about the future of existing interest rate benchmarks, which may affect financial reporting by companies. In 2018, the Board noted the increasing level of uncertainty about the long-term viability of some interest rate benchmarks and decided to add a project to its agenda to consider the financial reporting implications of the reform. In its outreach with stakeholders, the Board has identified two groups of accounting issues that could have financial reporting implications. These are:
- Pre-replacement issues (addressed in phase one)—These are issues affecting financial reporting in the period before the replacement of an existing interest rate benchmark with an alternative risk-free rate.
- Replacement issues (addressed in phase two)—These are issues that might affect financial reporting when an existing interest rate benchmark is replaced with an alternative risk-free rate.
Keywords: International, Accounting, Banking, Securities, IBOR, Interest Rate Benchmark, Reporting, IFRS 9, IASB
Previous ArticleBaFin Announces AFS Recommendation to Activate CCyB for Banks
APRA issued a letter on the loss-absorbing capacity (LAC) requirements for domestic systemically important banks (D-SIBs) and published a discussion paper, along with the proposed the prudential standards on financial contingency planning (CPS 190) and resolution planning (CPS 900).
The European Commission (EC) launched a call for evidence, until March 18, 2022, as part of a comprehensive review of the macro-prudential rules for the banking sector under the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR) and Directive (CRD IV).
The Financial Stability Board (FSB) published a report that sets out good practices for crisis management groups.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) found that Heritage Bank Limited had incorrectly reported capital because of weaknesses in operational risk and compliance frameworks, although the bank did not breach minimum prudential capital ratios at any point and remains well-capitalized.
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) released the annual report for 2020-2021.
Through a letter addressed to the banking sector entities, the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) announced deferral of the domestic implementation of the final Basel III reforms from the first to the second quarter of 2023.
EIOPA recently published a letter in which EC is informing the European Parliament and Council that it could not adopt the set of draft regulatory technical standards for disclosures under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) within the stipulated three-month period, given their length and technical detail.
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) published the third in a series of policy statements that set out rules to introduce the UK Investment Firm Prudential Regime (IFPR), which will take effect on January 01, 2022.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published, along with a summary of its response to the consultation feedback, an information paper that summarizes the finalized capital framework that is in line with the internationally agreed Basel III requirements for banks.
The Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) issued a consultative report focusing on access to central counterparty (CCP) clearing and client-position portability.