APRA published a discussion paper that outlines the potential approaches to adjust the capital framework for authorized deposit-taking institutions to make capital ratios more transparent, comparable, and flexible. These approaches focus on amending disclosure requirements and the way in which institutions would be required to calculate and report capital ratios, without altering the quantum and risk-sensitivity of capital requirements. Written submissions must be sent by November 02, 2018.
The approaches would not change the amount of capital authorized deposit-taking institutions are required to hold beyond the unquestionably strong capital benchmarks announced in July 2017. Rather, APRA is considering whether to alter the way authorized deposit-taking institutions’ capital requirements are calculated and disclosed to facilitate greater domestic and international comparability and transparency of capital strength. The discussion paper outlines two general approaches designed to aid authorized deposit-taking institutions in representing and communicating their capital strength:
- Under the first approach, authorized deposit-taking institutions would continue using existing definitions of capital and risk-weighted assets, but APRA would develop a methodology allowing them to improve the credibility and robustness of internationally comparable capital ratio disclosures
- Under a second approach, APRA would change the way authorized deposit-taking institutions calculate capital ratios to instead use more internationally harmonized definitions of capital and risk-weighted assets. To maintain the strength and risk-sensitivity of the capital framework, there would need to be corresponding increases in minimum ratio and/or capital buffer requirements.
The discussion paper also proposes measures to make the capital framework more flexible in times of stress, including by increasing the size of regulatory capital buffers relative to minimum regulatory capital requirements. APRA is open to considering these approaches independently or in combination, or indeed retaining its current methodology, and is seeking industry feedback on whether the benefits of the suggested approaches outweigh the regulatory burden and associated increase in complexity. APRA intends to consult on draft revised prudential standards incorporating the outcome of this consultation in 2019. APRA expects that final prudential standards would be released by mid-2020. In finalizing the revised capital framework, APRA will have regard to the Basel III implementation timetable. However, as indicated in the February 2018 Discussion Paper, it is likely that the revised prudential requirements would commence from January 01, 2021
Comment Due Date: November 02, 2018
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Banking, Capital Framework, Basel III, Regulatory Capital, Disclosures, APRA
APRA finalized the reporting standard ARS 115.0 on capital adequacy with respect to the standardized measurement approach to operational risk for authorized deposit-taking institutions in Australia.
EBA is consulting on the implementing technical standards for Pillar 3 disclosures on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) risks, as set out in requirements under Article 449a of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).
ESAs Issue Advice on KPIs on Sustainability for Nonfinancial Reporting
EU published Directive 2021/338, which amends the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID) II and the Capital Requirements Directives (CRD 4 and 5) to facilitate recovery from the COVID-19 crisis.
The EBA Single Rulebook question and answer (Q&A) tool updates for this month include answers to ten questions.
ESMA updated the set of questions and answers (Q&A), along with the reporting instructions and an XML schema for the templates set out in the technical standards on disclosure requirements, under the Securitization Regulation.
EU published Regulation 2021/337, which amends the Transparency Directive (2004/109/EC), regarding the use of the single electronic reporting format for annual financial reports.
The Standing Committee of the European Free Trade Association (EFTA) recommended that a systemic risk buffer level of 4.5% for domestic exposures can be considered appropriate for addressing the identified systemic risks to the stability of the financial system in Norway.
In a recent statement, PRA clarified its approach to the application of certain EU regulatory technical standards and EBA guidelines on standardized and internal ratings-based approaches to credit risk, following the end of the Brexit transition.
In a recently published letter addressed to the G20 finance ministers and central bank governors, the FSB Chair Randal K. Quarles has set out the key FSB priorities for 2021.