EBA published an overview of the findings from a review of the use, usefulness, and implementation of the Single Rulebook Questions and Answers (Q&A) tool. The Q&A tool provides common answers to stakeholder questions on the regulatory framework in EU. The review, which focused on the final Q&A for the Capital Requirements Regulation and Directive (CRR and CRD), was carried out in the second half of 2018, using questionnaires addressed to competent authorities and select industry representatives. Overall, competent authorities and institutions are satisfied with the utility of the Single Rulebook Q&A tool and the answers, but they made important and sometimes far-reaching suggestions for improvement.
The findings show that competent authorities and institutions widely encourage the use of the Q&A process and tool. The final answers are very largely followed and play a considerable role in the application and implementation of CRR and CRD. Similar rationales were given to explain the limited number of cases of non-application that were reported. EBA is considering these cases in more detail to better understand the obstacles and issues. Based on the observations made, EBA included in the report non-prescriptive good practice guidance that institutions could adopt when using the Q&A tool. The main observations of the review can be summarized as follows:
- Competent authorities use regular or ad hoc measures to encourage the use of the process and tool internally.
- Similarities were observed in terms of the measures taken by competent authorities at the institution level or by institutions internally to promote the Q&A tool and the use of answers.
- Cases of non-application of Q&A identified by survey participants were limited. Based on responses as of the end of September 2019, there were 29 cases out of about 620 final published CRR and CRD Q&A on policy issues.
- The number of cases of non-application notified by competent authorities was limited to 11 Q&A, while the number of such cases notified by institutions was 23 Q&A (with some duplication between the two).
- Competent authorities and institutions are, overall, satisfied with the utility of the Single Rulebook Q&A tool and the answers including the Interactive Single Rulebook, but they make important/far-reaching suggestions for improvement.
Based on the above observations, EBA put forward a non-prescriptive, good practice guidance that institutions could adopt with respect to the use of Q&A. The Q&A process was established by EBA in 2013 and followed a thorough due process involving close and ongoing interaction between EBA, competent authorities, and EC, with a view to developing common answers to stakeholder questions that are fully consistent with the EU legislative texts. Over 4,440 questions had been submitted through the Q&A tool at the end of 2018. Out of these, about 1,545 issues could be answered and nearly 1,360 questions had to be rejected. Notwithstanding some concerns about the time it takes to finalize answers, and in a very few cases about their impact, the feedback from the industry and the supervisory community has been broadly positive.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Single Rulebook, Interactive Single Rulebook, Q&A, CRR, CRD IV, Single Rulebook Review, EBA
Previous ArticleOSFI Revises Guideline on Interest Rate Risk Management by Banks
The European Commission (EC) published the Delegated Regulation 2021/1527 with regard to the regulatory technical standards for the contractual recognition of write down and conversion powers.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published a new set of frequently asked questions (FAQs) to provide guidance to authorized deposit-taking institutions on the interpretation of APS 120, the prudential standard on securitization.
The Single Resolution Board (SRB) published a Communication on the application of regulatory technical standard provisions on prior permission for reducing eligible liabilities instruments as of January 01, 2022.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published a new set of frequently asked questions (FAQs) to clarify the regulatory capital treatment of investments in the overseas deposit-taking and insurance subsidiaries.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final report on the guidelines specifying the criteria to assess the exceptional cases when institutions exceed the large exposure limits and the time and measures needed for institutions to return to compliance.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) issued the policy statement PS20/21, which contains final rules for the application of existing consolidated prudential requirements to financial holding companies and mixed financial holding companies.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) revised the guidelines on stress tests to be conducted by the national deposit guarantee schemes under the Deposit Guarantee Schemes Directive (DGSD).
The European Commission (EC) announced that Nordea Bank has signed a guarantee agreement with the European Investment Bank (EIB) Group to support the sustainable transformation of businesses in the Nordics.
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) issued a circular, for all authorized institutions, to confirm its support of an information note that sets out various options available in the loan market for replacing USD LIBOR with the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR).
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) issued a new "Problem Bank Supervision" booklet of the Comptroller's Handbook. The booklet covers information on timely identification and rehabilitation of problem banks and their advanced supervision, enforcement, and resolution when conditions warrant.