EBA published its advice to EC on the implementation of Basel III in EU. The advice includes a quantitative analysis of the estimated impact of Basel III based on data from 189 banks and offers a set of policy recommendations. This work is in response to the call for advice from EC. EBA welcomed improvements introduced in the final Basel III package, including the introduction of a higher degree of risk-sensitivity in the standardized approaches to measure credit and operational risks and the constraints to internal modeling by banks where undue variability of model outcomes was observed in the past. Overall, these reforms are expected to increase financial stability while allowing the continued use of risk-sensitive approaches. EBA also published letter from Olivier Guersent, Director General FISMA, regarding the call for advice on the final elements of the Basel III framework.
The impact assessment shows that the full implementation of Basel III, under conservative assumptions, will increase the minimum capital requirement by 24.4% on an average. This increase in capital requirements will imply an aggregate shortfall in total capital of about EUR 135.1 billion (EUR 91.1 billion in terms of common equity tier 1). The majority of the capital impact occurs on large globally active banks. The impact on medium-size banks is limited to 11.3% in terms of minimum capital requirement, leading to a shortfall of EUR 0.9 billion, and the impact on small banks is limited to to 5.5% in terms of the minimum capital requirement, with a EUR 0.1 billion shortfall. EBA supports full implementation of the final Basel III standards, which will contribute to the credibility of the banking sector in EU and ensure a well-functioning global banking market. The analysis includes Pillar 2 requirements and the full set of combined buffer requirements in the calculation of banks' minimum required capital and assumes that these requirements remain at current levels.
EBA published four policy advice reports that provide detailed policy recommendations for a number of areas of the Basel III framework, including the following:
- In the area of credit risk—All the newly agreed revisions should be implemented in EU, maintaining a prudential framework based on external ratings and the loan-splitting approach to exposures secured by real estate. The report also recommends that no EU-specific supporting factors for small and medium-size enterprises (SME) and infrastructure lending exposures are retained.
- In the area of securities financing transactions—All the newly agreed revisions should be implemented in EU, except for the minimum haircuts floor framework where EBA believes further analysis is needed.
- In the area of operational risk—The new standardized approach should be implemented. The standardized approach should be based on the institution-specific historical loss component for larger institutions to maintain a risk-sensitive approach. For the same reason, smaller institutions may be allowed to also use the historical loss component on a case-by-case basis. EBA advises EC to consider a phase-in period for the standardized approach.
- Output floor—It should be introduced and, where applicable, should be used to compute all capital requirements, including EU-specific requirements such as the systemic risk buffer. The output floor should be applied at all levels of consolidation.
BCBS has recently made targeted revisions to the fundamental review of the trading book (FRTB) and these revisions have not been assessed in this report. In line with the request from EC, EBA will publish its advice on the implementation of the finalized FRTB and credit valuation adjustment (CVA) frameworks, along with an analysis of the macroeconomic impact of the final Basel III framework later this year. In this context, EBA acknowledges receipt of an additional request for technical advice from EC on further aspects of the final Basel III framework.
- Press Release
- Impact Assessment
- Policy Advice—Credit Risk (PDF)
- Policy Advice—SFTs (PDF)
- Policy Advice—Operational Risk (PDF)
- Policy Advice—Output Floor (PDF)
- Call for Advice and Related Documents
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Basel III, Impact Assessment, Basel III Finalization, Proportionality, Call for Advice, Minimum Capital Requirements, Basel III Monitoring, Recommendations, EC, EBA
Previous ArticleBOT and SBV Sign MoUs to Promote Regulatory and Fintech Cooperation
BoE published a statistical notice (Notice 2020/9) explaining the approach for treatment of payment holidays on the profit and loss return or Form PL.
BoE updated the known issues document for the statistical reporting Forms AS and FV.
FED announced individual capital requirements for 34 large banks and these requirements go into effect on October 01, 2020.
SRB published a set of documents to give operational guidance to banks on implementation of the bail-in tool.
BIS published an update on the G20 TechSprint Initiative, which was launched in April 2020 and aims to highlight the potential for technologies to resolve regulatory compliance (regtech) and supervisory (suptech) challenges.
OSFI published a letter that provides an update on the milestones for the implementation of the IFRS 17 standard on insurance contracts.
EBA updated the report on the implementation of selected COVID-19 policies.
The Financial Stability Institute (FSI) of BIS published a brief note that examines the supervisory challenges associated with certain temporary regulatory relief measures introduced by BCBS and prudential authorities in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
BCBS is consulting on the principles for operational resilience and the revisions to the principles for sound management of operational risk for banks.
BoE updated the reporting template for Form ER as well as the Form ER definitions, which contain guidance on the methodology to be used in calculating annualized interest rates.