US Proposes Final Basel Rules, Transition Period to Start in July 2025
The U.S. banking agencies (FDIC, FED, and OCC) recently proposed rules implementing the final Basel III reforms, also known as the Basel III Endgame. The rules, which have been proposed post the banking turmoil in March 2023, seek to further strengthen the banking system by applying a broader set of capital requirements to more large banks. In a separate notice, the Federal Reserve Board also proposed certain adjustments to the calculation of the capital surcharge for the largest and most complex banks. The comment period on both proposals, which is longer than usual, ends on November 30, 2023 while the speculation indicates that the U.S. regulators are likely to finalize these rules by mid-2024.
Summary of proposed changes
The proposal would apply to larger banks with more than USD 100 billion in total consolidated assets but would not impact the community banks. For banks below $100 billion in total assets, the market risk provisions of the proposal would also apply to those with significant trading activity. For banks with more than USD 100 billion in assets, the proposal would:
- revise aspects of the capital framework related to credit risk, market risk, operational risk, and financial derivative risk.
- improve consistency and replace internal-models-based capital requirements for credit and operational risk currently included in Category I or II capital standards with new, risk-sensitive standardized requirements (the “expanded risk-based approach”) that would apply to all banking organizations with USD 100 billion or more in total assets (that is, banking organizations subject to Category I, II, III, or IV capital standards)
- require banks to include unrealized gains and losses from certain securities in their capital ratios.
- subject these banks to the supplementary leverage ratio requirement and the countercyclical capital buffer, if activated.
- replace the current approaches for measuring capital requirements for credit valuation adjustment (CVA) risk for OTC derivative contracts with non-model-based approaches, including a less burdensome option intended for less complex banking organizations.
- revise certain existing qualitative disclosure requirements and introduce new and enhanced qualitative disclosure requirements related to the proposed revisions to the capital rule.
- result in revisions to the reporting forms of the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC) for affected banking organizations (to be proposed separately).
Proposed timelines
As proposed, the implementation of these final components of Basel III reforms should start from July 01, 2025, with full compliance expected by July 01, 2028. The transition provisions built into the proposal are intended to give banks sufficient time to adapt to the changes while minimizing any potential adverse impact. For banking organizations subject to Category III or IV standards, the requirement to reflect in regulatory capital accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI), which includes unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities, would be phased in over three years starting July 01, 2025.
Impact and market response
The proposed rules are estimated to bring into this regulatory net another 16 domestic banks and the intermediate holding companies of 12 foreign banks. As per the press release from US Agencies, the proposed improvements to strengthen the banking system are estimated to result in an aggregate 16% increase in common equity tier 1 capital requirements for affected bank holding companies, with the increase principally affecting the largest and most complex banks. However, various estimates from market participants differ and peg this increase to be in the range of 16% to 25%. The proposal is receiving adverse response from certain market participants and even certain members of the regulatory bodies in the country are divided in their stance toward these proposed rules. Yet another group of stakeholders emphasize the need for a balance between safeguarding the banking system and the costs associated with requiring higher capital from the banks. Considering that the proposal has a longer than usual comment period, the existing, market sentiment, and the fact that regulators say that "all comments will be carefully considered," it is speculated by some that the there is a possibility that the final version of the proposal may be quite different from this proposed version.
Visit the Moody’s Analytics microsite for Banking Cloud Solutions to find out how our solutions help banks get up-to-date with the latest capital adequacy requirements and address the regulatory reporting requirements.
Related Regulatory References
Keywords: Americas, US, Banking, Basel, Final Basel III Reforms, Basel Endgame, Reporting, G-SIBs, US Agencies
Featured Experts

María Cañamero
Skilled market researcher; growth strategist; successful go-to-market campaign developer

Nicolas Degruson
Works with financial institutions, regulatory experts, business analysts, product managers, and software engineers to drive regulatory solutions across the globe.

Scott Dietz
Scott is a Director in the Regulatory and Accounting Solutions team responsible for providing accounting expertise across solutions, products, and services offered by Moody’s Analytics in the US. He has over 15 years of experience leading auditing, consulting and accounting policy initiatives for financial institutions.
Previous Article
FSB Report Outlines Next Steps for Climate Risk RoadmapRelated Articles
ISSB Sustainability Standards Expected to Become Global Baseline
The finalization of the two sustainability disclosure standards—IFRS S1 and IFRS S2—is expected to be a significant step forward in the harmonization of sustainability disclosures worldwide.
IOSCO, BIS, and FSB to Intensify Focus on Decentralized Finance
Decentralized finance (DeFi) is expected to increase in prominence, finding traction in use cases such as lending, trading, and investing, without the intermediation of traditional financial institutions.
BCBS Assesses NSFR and Large Exposures Rules in US
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) published reports that assessed the overall implementation of the net stable funding ratio (NSFR) and the large exposures rules in the U.S.
Global Agencies Focus on ESG Data, Climate Litigation and Nature Risks
At the global level, supervisory efforts are increasingly focused on addressing climate risks via better quality data and innovative use of technologies such as generative artificial intelligence (AI) and blockchain.
ISSB Standards Shine Spotlight on Comparability of ESG Disclosures
The finalization of the IFRS sustainability disclosure standards in late June 2023 has brought to the forefront the themes of the harmonization of sustainability disclosures
EBA Issues Several Regulatory and Reporting Updates for Banks
The European Banking Authority (EBA) recently issued several regulatory publications impacting the banking sector.
BCBS Proposes to Revise Core Principles for Banking Supervision
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) launched a consultation on revisions to the core principles for effective banking supervision, with the comment period ending on October 06, 2023.
FSB Report Outlines Next Steps for Climate Risk Roadmap
The Financial Stability Board (FSB) recently published the second annual progress report on the July 2021 roadmap to address climate-related financial risks.
EBA Plans on Ad-hoc ESG Data Collection and Climate Scenario Exercise
The recognition of climate change as a systemic risk to the global economy has further intensified regulatory and supervisory focus on monitoring of the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) risks.
Implementation Status of Final Basel III Reforms Varies Across Globe
The target timelines for implementation of the final Basel III—also called by some as Basel IV or Basel 3.1—reforms vary significantly worldwide.