ESMA Issues Opinion on ESG Disclosures for Benchmark Administrators
ESMA issued a no-action letter to promote coordinated action by national competent authorities regarding the new environmental, social and governance (ESG) disclosure requirements for benchmark administrators, under the Benchmarks Regulation. According to the letter, national competent authorities should not prioritize supervisory or enforcement action against administrators regarding these new requirements until the delegated acts apply. ESMA also issued an opinion to EC on the need for prompt adoption of the relevant delegated acts. The new requirements are due to apply on April 30, 2020 and require benchmark administrators to include details of how ESG factors are reflected in their methodology documents and benchmark statements.
The new ESG-related disclosure requirements oblige benchmark administrators, by April 30, to include:
- in their methodology document, an explanation of how the key elements of the methodology reflect ESG factors for each benchmark or family of benchmarks
- in their benchmark statement, an explanation of how ESG factors are reflected in each benchmark or family of benchmarks provided and published.
These disclosure requirements that have been set out in the EU Regulation 2016/1011 aim to increase the comparability of benchmarks with regard to ESG factors and are key for users of benchmarks to make well-informed choices. The associated delegated acts are expected to ensure that these objectives may be achieved by setting out the minimum content of the ESG factors to be disclosed as well as the standard formats for the presentation of that information.
EC, on April 08, 2020, had published the draft delegated acts, the consultation period for which ends on May 06, 2020. Following their adoption, the delegated acts will be subject to a scrutiny period by the European Parliament and by the Council before they enter into force. In its opinion to EC, ESMA states that it considers it necessary for national competent authorities to address the absence of the delegated acts through consistent risk-based supervisory and enforcement practices. ESMA explained that if the date of application of the new disclosure requirements had been aligned with the date of application of the delegated acts, significant issues would not have arisen. ESMA asserted that the delegated acts should be adopted by EC without delay, to ensure the objectives of these requirements are achieved, to provide administrators with clarity on how to apply these requirements, and to provide competent authorities with clarity on how to supervise compliance with these requirements.
Related Links
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Securities, ESG, Benchmarks Regulation, Opinion, National Competent Authorities, Delegated Act, Disclosures, Benchmark Administrator, Climate Change Risk, ESMA
Next Article
ESRB Reviews Macro-Prudential Policy in EU in 2019Related Articles
APRA Publishes FAQs on Capital Treatment of Overseas Subsidiaries
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published a new set of frequently asked questions (FAQs) to clarify the regulatory capital treatment of investments in the overseas deposit-taking and insurance subsidiaries.
HKMA Endorses Industry Guidance to Support LIBOR Transition
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) issued a circular, for all authorized institutions, to confirm its support of an information note that sets out various options available in the loan market for replacing USD LIBOR with the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR).
FDIC Announces Winners of Tech Sprint to Reach Unbanked Consumers
The tech lab of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) selected three winning teams in a tech sprint designed to explore new technologies and techniques to help banks meet the needs of unbanked consumers.
MAS Consults on Capital and Reporting Requirements for Market Risk
The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) launched a consultation on the standards for market risk capital and the associated reporting requirements for banks incorporated in Singapore.
PRA Letter Sets Out Findings on Reliability of Regulatory Reporting
PRA published a "Dear CEO" letter that sets out findings of a review on the reliability of regulatory reporting and reiterates the supervisory expectations on regulatory reporting.
APRA Connect to Go Live; APRA to Reduce Reliance on CLF
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) confirmed that its new data collection solution APRA Connect will go live on September 13, 2021.
FED Paper Explores Fintech Partnership Dynamics in Community Banks
The Federal Reserve System (FED) published a paper describing the landscape of partnerships between community banks and fintech companies.
FDIC Selects Four Vendors for Next Phase of Rapid Prototyping Pilot
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) has chosen four companies—Novantas Inc, Palantir Technologies Inc, PeerIQ, and S&P Global Market Intelligence LLC—to propose a pilot consisting of testing new reporting and analytical tools with a small group of FDIC-supervised institutions on a voluntary basis.
PRA Consults on Requirements to Identify Material Risk-Takers
The Prudential Regulatory Authority (PRA), via the consultation paper CP18/21, proposed changes to the applicable requirements on the identification of material risk-takers for the purposes of the remuneration regime.
ESA Report Points to Elevated Credit and Cyber Risks in Wake of Crisis
The Joint Committee of European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs) published its second 2021 joint risk assessment report for the financial sector.
