EC published a statement from the EU Technical Expert Group on Sustainable Finance, established to advise EC on implementation of the Action Plan on Financing Sustainable Growth, believes that the Sustainable Taxonomy, EU Green Bond Standard, and Paris-Aligned and Climate Transition Benchmarks can guide public- and private-sector plans for recovery from the pandemic, including the European Council’s recently announced Roadmap to Recovery.
The Group states that scientists have warned that loss of biodiversity and disease outbreak are closely related and to expect a volatile climate as a result of human contribution to climate change. As plans for economic recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic are being prepared, governments and the private sector must be attentive to the details of what a resilient, sustainable, and fair recovery looks like in practice—to ensure greater resilience to further environmental and social crises ahead. The Expert Group has developed three tools that can guide both government and private-sector plans:
- The Sustainable Taxonomyprovides a framework for future recovery measures. It shows the environmental performance and minimum social standards that are necessary for economic activities to reach climate and environmental goals, including climate neutrality by 2050 and ambitious 2030 targets. The Taxonomy is particularly relevant for new investments, which are needed to transition economy, showing how and where to cut carbon emissions, build climate resilience, optimize supply chains toward sustainability, and stimulate jobs.
- The Green Bond Standard, which presents a best practice model and the elements of which can be applied by all bond issuers to explain how their funding contributes to the wider sustainability strategy and resulting environmental and social impact of the issuer. The framework of the Green Bond Standard can also be applied to increase transparency of social impact and outcomes of finance.
- The Paris-Aligned and Climate Transition Benchmarks are tools to support allocation of a large amount of private capital toward climate transition. They do so by aligning the portfolio selection of investors with the climate change objectives.
The statement highlights that members of the European Council identified the central role of the Green Deal in its Roadmap for Recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic. The Green Deal includes 2050 climate neutrality and a pending 2030 climate goal. These climate goals must be used to calibrate recovery responses. Recovery plans should not support environmentally or socially harmful activities, which would worsen the current and future crises, locking in highly polluting infrastructure or promoting activities that do not contribute to social well-being for decades to come. According to the Expert Group, the private sector also has a clear role in ensuing access to finance in a sustainable recovery. Private-sector plans must be transparent and clear on their alignment with the environmental and social objectives to increase the effective targeting of public recovery measures.
Related Link: Statement
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Insurance, Securities, Green Deal, Climate Change Risk, COVID-19, ESG, Sustainable Taxonomy, Climate Transition Benchmarks, Climate Neutrality 2050, Sustainable Finance, EC
Leading economist; commercial real estate; performance forecasting, econometric infrastructure; data modeling; credit risk modeling; portfolio assessment; custom commercial real estate analysis; thought leader.
Previous ArticleIASB Explains Its Decision on Annual Cohort Requirement in IFRS 17
APRA issued a letter on the loss-absorbing capacity (LAC) requirements for domestic systemically important banks (D-SIBs) and published a discussion paper, along with the proposed the prudential standards on financial contingency planning (CPS 190) and resolution planning (CPS 900).
The European Commission (EC) launched a call for evidence, until March 18, 2022, as part of a comprehensive review of the macro-prudential rules for the banking sector under the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR) and Directive (CRD IV).
The Financial Stability Board (FSB) published a report that sets out good practices for crisis management groups.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) found that Heritage Bank Limited had incorrectly reported capital because of weaknesses in operational risk and compliance frameworks, although the bank did not breach minimum prudential capital ratios at any point and remains well-capitalized.
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) released the annual report for 2020-2021.
Through a letter addressed to the banking sector entities, the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) announced deferral of the domestic implementation of the final Basel III reforms from the first to the second quarter of 2023.
EIOPA recently published a letter in which EC is informing the European Parliament and Council that it could not adopt the set of draft regulatory technical standards for disclosures under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) within the stipulated three-month period, given their length and technical detail.
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) published the third in a series of policy statements that set out rules to introduce the UK Investment Firm Prudential Regime (IFPR), which will take effect on January 01, 2022.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published, along with a summary of its response to the consultation feedback, an information paper that summarizes the finalized capital framework that is in line with the internationally agreed Basel III requirements for banks.
The Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) issued a consultative report focusing on access to central counterparty (CCP) clearing and client-position portability.