PRA proposed, via the consultation paper CP9/21, to correct an error in the definition of "higher paid material risk taker" in the Remuneration Part of the PRA Rulebook. The proposals in CP9/21, the comment period for which closes on May 26, 2021, would result in changes to the Remuneration Part of the PRA Rulebook and the supervisory statement SS2/17 on remuneration. PRA proposed that implementation of the changes resulting from CP9/21 would take effect on publication of the final policy. To avoid retroactivity, PRA proposed that firms would not be required to apply the corrected definition to remuneration that has been paid, vested, or is subject to an obligation to pay or vest created before that date, in respect of the first performance year beginning on or after December 29, 2020. PRA expects to publish the final policy in the second quarter of 2021.
The proposal is intended to align the "higher paid material risk taker" definition with the intention of PRA of continuing the approach outlined in SS2/17 on remuneration. PRA identified an error in the definition of "higher paid material risk taker" in Rule 1.3 in the Remuneration Part of the PRA Rulebook. The error was introduced as part of the policy statement PS29/20 on the fifth Capital Requirements Directive (CRD5). The erroneous definition states that "higher paid material risk taker" is defined as an individual whose annual variable remuneration exceeds 33% of their total remuneration and whose total remuneration exceeds GBP 500,000. This implies that an individual would need to meet both of these conditions to be considered a "higher paid material risk taker." However, PRA intended the definition to capture individuals who meet either of these conditions. Therefore, CP9/21 is proposing to change the "and" in the definition to "or." Thus, the correct text should convey that an individual should be treated as a “higher paid material risk taker” where either their annual variable remuneration exceeds 33% of their total remuneration, or their total remuneration exceeds GBP 500,000.
CP9/21 also proposes to make a consequential amendment to Table G in SS2/17, to reflect the updated definition in the table heading. The proposals set out in CP9/21 have been designed in the context of the UK having left EU and the transition period having come to an end. Unless otherwise stated, any references to EU or EU derived legislation refer to the version of that legislation which forms part of retained EU law. PRA will keep the policy under review to assess whether any changes would be required due to changes in the UK regulatory framework.
Keywords: Europe, UK, Banking, Remuneration, PRA Rulebook, CRD5, Basel, SS2/17, CP9/21, Operational Risk, PRA
Previous ArticleCBIRC to Further Promote Development of Financial Services for SMEs
In a letter addressed to the industry, the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) set out an updated schedule of policy priorities for the banking, insurance, and superannuation industries.
The European Commission (EC) adopted a comprehensive review package of Solvency II rules in the European Union.
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) issued Versions 1.0 of the "Earnings" and "Regulatory Reporting" booklets of the Comptroller's Handbook.
The European Central Bank (ECB) published results of its economy-wide climate stress test, which aimed to assess the resilience of non-financial corporates and euro area banks to climate risks.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published a report on the use of digital platforms in the banking and payments sector in European Union.
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) published updates on the policy measures that were announced in context of the ongoing pandemic.
The International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA), along with several other associations, submitted a joint response to the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) consultation on preliminary proposals for the prudential treatment of cryptoasset exposures.
BIS published the September issue of the Quarterly Review, which contains special features that analyze the rapid rise in equity funding for financial technology firms, the effectiveness of policy measures in response to pandemic, and the evolution of international banking.
The Basel Committee for Banking Supervision (BCBS) met in September 2021 and reviewed climate-related financial risks, discussed impact of digitalization, and welcomed efforts by the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) Foundation to develop a common set of sustainability reporting standards
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) issued a Cease and Desist Order against MUFG Union Bank for deficiencies in technology and operational risk governance.