Featured Product

    BoE Paper Studies Role of Regulation in Triggering Fire Sales by Banks

    BoE published a working paper that examines the role that the post-crisis regulatory framework might have in triggering fire sales by banks. To assess this, the authors develop a flexible and realistic model of fire sales that reflects the post-crisis regulatory environment and can be operationalized in stress testing models. The analysis helps to understand which types of financial shocks and regulatory requirements combine to produce fire sales and how banks optimally liquidate their portfolios during crises.

    Post the crisis, along with a more stringent regulatory framework, regulators had introduced regular and comprehensive stress testing frameworks to assess the ability of the financial system to weather severe market stresses. There is a widespread agreement on the need to make stress testing more macro-prudential through inclusion of feedback effects and amplification mechanisms, such as fire sales. While progress has been made in this direction, the existing models are too stylized to provide a realistic assessment of banks’ defensive actions under stress. The authors aim to bridge this gap by building a flexible analytical tool for regulatory stress tests to assess the risks from fire sales. To this end, the authors have developed a flexible and realistic model of fire sales that reflects the post-crisis regulatory environment and can be operationalized in stress testing models. This is because most existing models of fire sales are too stylized for direct use in policy analysis or to study contagion risk in a realistic setting. In this framework for modeling fire sales, banks face both liquidity and solvency constraints and choose which assets to sell to minimize liquidation losses.

    The model has been applied to seven UK banks subject to the regulatory stress test in 2017. It enables to explore the likelihood, causes, and magnitude of fire sales in different stress scenarios. The results show that banks constrained by the leverage ratio prefer to first sell assets that are liquid and held in small amounts, while banks constrained by the risk-weighted capital ratio and the liquidity coverage ratio need to trade off assets’ liquidity with their regulatory weights. Following solvency shocks, risk-based capital requirements tend to be more tightly binding and present incentives for banks to sell larger amounts of illiquid assets relative to the leverage ratio, which in turn leads to larger fire-sale losses. Nevertheless, fire-sale losses due to solvency shocks remain moderate even for severe shocks. In contrast, severe funding shocks can lead to large fire-sale losses. Thus, models that focus on solvency shocks and only include a leverage ratio may be missing two key drivers of fire-sale losses.

    The existing quantitative models of fire sales tend to assume that banks sell off assets in proportion to their initial holdings. In reality, banks are unlikely to follow this strategy, as this would involve them taking actions that cause significant losses. Allowing banks to optimize their liquidation strategy results in significantly lower losses than assuming that they sell assets in proportional to their holdings. This also implies that the assets more likely to transmit losses in a fire sale are liquid, rather than illiquid, assets. The model delivers the following policy implications:

    • It demonstrates the importance of ensuring that liquidity buffers are usable in stress. If banks aim to defend their liquidity positions by protecting their liquid asset buffers, they may fire sell illiquid assets, resulting in large losses. If, as emphasized by regulators, they fully utilize their liquid asset buffers then losses can be reduced.
    • It highlights a potentially negative side-effect of the new UK leverage framework, which excludes central bank reserves from the leverage ratio. Doing so removes a bank’s ability to use central bank reserves to deleverage once they breach their leverage ratio requirements, potentially leading to larger losses in a fire sale.

     

    Related Links

    Keywords: Europe, UK, Banking, Fire Sales, Stress Testing, Systemic Risk, Solvency and Liquidity Constraints, Capital Requirements, Basel III, Liquidity Risk, Research, BoE

    Featured Experts
    Related Articles
    News

    APRA Revises Related Entities Standard for Banks

    APRA published a strengthened prudential standard APS 222 on associations with related entities, with the aim to mitigate contagion risk within banking groups.

    August 20, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FSB on Responses to Consultation on Wind-Down of Trading Portfolios

    FSB published responses received to the consultation on the solvent wind-down of the derivatives and trading book portfolio of a global systemically important bank (G-SIB).

    August 19, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FSB Publishes Responses to Consultation on Resolvability Disclosures

    FSB published responses received to the consultation on disclosures for resolution planning and resolvability of banks.

    August 19, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    HKMA Revises Implementation Schedule for Initial Margin Rules

    HKMA intends to adopt a revised implementation schedule for the margin requirements for non-centrally cleared derivatives.

    August 16, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    HKMA Revises Guideline on Application of Banking Disclosure Rules

    HKMA issued a revised version of the Supervisory Policy Manual module CA-D-1 on guideline on the application of the Banking (Disclosure) Rules (BDR).

    August 16, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    ECB Decision on Recognizing Reporting Member States Under AnaCredit

    ECB has finalized the Decision 2019/1348 (ECB/2019/20) that establishes procedure for recognizing non-euro area member states as reporting member states under the AnaCredit Regulation (EU 2016/867).

    August 16, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FASB Proposes to Extend CECL Standard Deadline for Certain Entities

    FASB proposed an Accounting Standards Update that would grant private companies, not-for-profit organizations, and certain small public companies additional time to implement FASB standards on current expected credit losses (CECL), leases, and hedging.

    August 15, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    IASB Adds Phase Two of IBOR Reform to Its Work Plan

    IASB (or the Board) has added the second phase of its project focused on potential financial reporting implications linked to the interest rate benchmark reform—interbank offer rate (IBOR) reform—to its work plan.

    August 15, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FED Updates Draft Instructions for Proposed FR Y-14 Reporting Forms

    FED updated draft instructions for the monthly, quarterly, and annual capital assessments and stress testing reports, also known as forms FR Y-14M, FR Y-14Q, FR Y-14A, respectively.

    August 15, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FASB Proposes Taxonomy Changes Related to Topics 326, 815, and 842

    FASB is proposing taxonomy improvements for the proposed Accounting Standards Update on clarifying the interactions among topic 321 on investments in equity securities), topic 323 on investments under equity method and joint ventures), and topic 815 on derivatives and hedging.

    August 15, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 3665