PRA has issued a follow-up note for PRA-regulated insurers with regard to the PRA letter on its position regarding IFRS 9, capital requirements for firms, and loan covenants. On March 26, 2020, Sam Woods of PRA issued this letter to Chief Executive Officers of UK banks. Since then, some insurance firms have sought clarification on how the points in that letter should be interpreted in context of their internal assessments of loan creditworthiness and treatment of unrated assets.
The note highlights that the expectations of PRA for insurers' use of unrated assets have been set out in the supervisory statement (SS3/17) on Illiquid, unrated assets under Solvency II, which was updated on April 02, 2020. Paragraphs 2.8A to 2.8L of the SS3/17 set out relevant expectations regarding risk identification and application of judgments and methodologies. The accompanying policy statement (PS9/20) on income-producing real estate loans and internal credit assessments for illiquid, unrated assets further refers to the published measures to alleviate operational burdens arising due to the COVID-19 outbreak. In this context, while Sam Woods’ letter does not address insurers’ internal credit ratings, some points in the letter can be considered to have applicability beyond the insurers that are using IFRS 9 to account for financial instruments.
Insurers are advised to read the letter in its entirety. Paragraph 5 of the Annex to the letter includes further examples of considerations that insurance firms may find helpful when forming their judgments on the impact of COVID-19 outbreak on their internal credit assessments. Similarly, regarding breaches to loan covenants arising directly as a result of COVID-19, the letter further noted that in the current uncertain environment such breaches may not necessarily be reflective of long-term credit risk. Nevertheless, it should be noted that firms will need to use their judgment to determine which covenant breaches do reflect increased credit risk and which do not. As set out in the letter, it remains important that firms’ assessments of covenant breaches fully take into account the differences between normal covenant breaches and those that might occur directly because of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Kewywords: Europe, UK, Insurance, COVID-19, IFRS 9, Capital Requirements, Solvency II, Credit Risk, Loan Convenant, Credit Ratings, Financial Instruments, PRA
Previous ArticleHKMA Publishes Results of Survey on Interest Rate Benchmark Reforms
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) found that Heritage Bank Limited had incorrectly reported capital because of weaknesses in operational risk and compliance frameworks, although the bank did not breach minimum prudential capital ratios at any point and remains well-capitalized.
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) released the annual report for 2020-2021.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published, along with a summary of its response to the consultation feedback, an information paper that summarizes the finalized capital framework that is in line with the internationally agreed Basel III requirements for banks.
The Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) issued a consultative report focusing on access to central counterparty (CCP) clearing and client-position portability.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) released the final Prudential Practice Guide on management of climate change financial risks (CPG 229) for banks, insurers, and superannuation trustees.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) Single Rulebook Question and Answer (Q&A) tool updates for this month include answers to 10 questions.
The European Commission, or EC, finalized the Implementing Regulation 2021/2017 with respect to the benchmark portfolios, reporting templates, and reporting instructions for the supervisory benchmarking of internal approaches for calculating own funds requirements.
The European Commission (EC) has adopted a package of measures related to the Capital Markets Union.
The European Council adopted its position on two proposals that are part of the digital finance package adopted by the European Commission in September 2020, with one of the proposals involving the regulation on markets in crypto-assets (MiCA) and the other involving the Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA).
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) is proposing, via the consultation paper CP21/21, to apply group provisions in the Operational Resilience Part of the PRA Rulebook (relevant for the Capital Requirements Regulation or CRR firms) to holding companies.