HKMA published the results of a survey intended to assess progress of banking sector in preparing for the transition to alternative reference rates. The survey on the interest rate benchmark reforms in Hong Kong was launched in November 2019. Results of the survey show that nearly one-third of London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR)-linked assets and liabilities and almost half of the derivatives contracts referencing LIBOR would mature after the end of 2021 and do not have adequate fallback provisions. Overall, the derivatives contracts referencing LIBOR amounted to HKD 35 trillion in notional value at the end of September 2019.
The survey indicates that new issuance and trading volume of products referencing alternative reference rates continued to increase. In Hong Kong, the working group on alternative reference rates, formed under the Treasury Markets Association, has been following up on issues that need to be addressed locally. The Treasury Markets Association also developed a dedicated web page containing a collection of useful information on benchmark reform and transition to alternative reference rates. HKMA, in consultation with the Treasury Markets Association, will consider providing more assistance to the banking industry in overcoming the following identified challenges:
- No standard and consistent fallback language existed in the industry for adoption by authorized institutions and other market participants in their existing contracts referencing LIBOR.
- The liquidity for products referencing alternative reference rates was found to be comparatively low.
- No well-established term structure was available for alternative reference rates.
- Limited guidance was available to assist smaller institutions in preparing for the transition.
- Authorized institutions needed to implement significant changes to their information technology systems, internal models, and processes within a short timeframe to cater for the transition to alternative reference rates.
- Certain types of financial contracts referencing LIBOR were difficult, if not impossible, for authorized institutions to renegotiate with their customers or counterparties.
- Authorized Institutions might face conduct risk when dealing with their customers along the transition to alternative reference rates.
- Awareness of the benchmark reform and the need for transition to alternative reference rates were comparatively low among non-authorized institutions customers and counterparties.
- It was unclear whether and, if so, how the transition to alternative reference rates would affect authorized institutions in respect of taxation, accounting, and regulatory framework.
- The status of Hong Kong Interbank Offered Rate (HIBOR) vis-à-vis Hong Kong Dollar Overnight Index Average (HONIA) as the local interest rate benchmark over a longer term was uncertain.
Outside of Hong Kong, FCA had issued a statement, in March, highlighting that the central assumption that firms cannot rely on LIBOR being published after the end of 2021 did not change, notwithstanding the COVID-19 outbreak. Certain organizations leading the transition to alternative reference rates, including the Working Group on Sterling Risk-Free Reference Rates in UK and the Alternative Reference Rates Committee in US, published their work plans and expected milestones for 2020 to facilitate preparation by the market participants. The Alternative Reference Rates Committee in US is developing a set of best practices for the industry to help support the transition away from LIBOR, in addition to a practical implementation checklist for the adoption of secured overnight financing rate. In parallel, these organizations as well as other industry bodies such as ISDA are working toward developing fallback provisions for different types of products and market conventions in using alternative reference rates.
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Hong Kong, Banking, Alternative Reference Rates, Interest Rate Benchmarks, LIBOR, COVID-19, Fallback Provisions, Risk-Free Rates, HIBOR, Benchmark Reforms, HKMA
HKMA is consulting on revisions to the Supervisory Policy Manual module CR-G-14 on margin and other risk mitigation standards for non-centrally cleared over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives transactions.
PRA provided further information on the application of regulatory capital and IFRS 9 requirements to payment holidays granted or extended to address the challenges arising from COVID-19 outbreak.
HKMA announced the publication of a report on fintech adoption and innovation in the banking industry in Hong Kong.
BIS published a working paper that examines the drivers of cyber risk, especially in context of the cloud services.
ECB launched consultation on a guide specifying how the Banking Supervision expects banks to consider climate-related and environmental risks in their governance and risk management frameworks and when formulating and implementing their business strategy.
ECB published an opinion (CON/2020/16) on amendments to the prudential framework in EU in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
EBA published a report that examines the interlinkages between recovery and resolution planning under the Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive (BRRD).
SRB published the final Minimum Requirements for Own Funds and Eligible Liabilities (MREL) policy under the Banking Package.
US Agencies (FDIC, FED, and OCC) published a final rule that makes technical changes to the March 31, 2020 interim final rule that provides a five-year transition period for the impact of the current expected credit loss (CECL) methodology on regulatory capital.
ECB published results of the March 2020 survey on credit terms and conditions in euro-denominated securities financing and over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives markets.