ECB published the results of the assessment of internal models that banks use to calculate risk-weighted assets for credit, market, and counterparty credit risks. This targeted review of internal models, or TRIM, is aimed to ensure that banks comply with rules and implement internal models consistently. The review confirmed that the internal models of significant institutions can continue to be used for the calculation of own funds requirements, provided they remediate the identified shortcomings within the given deadlines—that is, they restore full compliance with legal requirements. In the future, banks will need to continue to invest in high-quality models and, thus, it is particularly important that banks further strengthen their internal validation function.
The review also concludes that further efforts and investments are expected to support institutions in deciding on their model strategies. Defining these internal model strategies will support institutions in the decision on the optimal use of time and resources invested in model development and maintenance and may lead to simplifications in the current model landscapes, as part of the preparation for upcoming regulatory developments. These developments foresee the decommissioning of some existing models—or to the corresponding necessary improvements also for some less material or less critical models. Going forward the positive experience and wealth of results from TRIM will bring long-lasting and sustainable benefits beyond the project itself, not least by helping institutions to be better prepared to face current and future challenges related either to economic shocks or to the adaptation of existing models to regulatory developments. The implementation of Basel III standards, through the amendments to the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR), the regulatory review of the internal ratings-based approach led by EBA and the remediation of TRIM findings should provide complementary layers of safeguarding against inadequate internal models. Good internal models help to measure risk appropriately, thus better preparing banks to react and answer to economic shocks like the COVID-19 pandemic.
The TRIM was a multi-year project launched by ECB at the beginning of 2016, in close cooperation with the national competent authorities that are part of European banking supervision. TRIM aimed to assess whether the Pillar I internal models used by significant institutions within the Single Supervisory Mechanism (SSM) are appropriate in the light of the applicable regulatory requirements and whether their results are reliable and comparable. Furthermore, TRIM aimed to harmonize supervisory practices for internal models in the SSM. With 200 on-site investigations conducted at 65 significant banks using internal models, TRIM is the largest project ever carried out by the ECB Banking Supervision. The findings communicated within TRIM have been followed up with binding supervisory decisions requesting the institutions to address these shortcomings. ECB identified over 5,000 findings and issued binding supervisory measures for banks to take corrective action within given deadlines. Through such measures, TRIM resulted in a 12% increase, or about EUR 275 billion, of risk-weighted assets for the investigated models.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, TRIM, Internal Models, Credit Risk, Market Risk, SSM, Counterparty Credit Risk, Regulatory Capital, Basel, SSM, ECB
In a letter addressed to the industry, the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) set out an updated schedule of policy priorities for the banking, insurance, and superannuation industries.
The European Commission (EC) adopted a comprehensive review package of Solvency II rules in the European Union.
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) issued Versions 1.0 of the "Earnings" and "Regulatory Reporting" booklets of the Comptroller's Handbook.
The European Central Bank (ECB) published results of its economy-wide climate stress test, which aimed to assess the resilience of non-financial corporates and euro area banks to climate risks.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published a report on the use of digital platforms in the banking and payments sector in European Union.
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) published updates on the policy measures that were announced in context of the ongoing pandemic.
The International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA), along with several other associations, submitted a joint response to the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) consultation on preliminary proposals for the prudential treatment of cryptoasset exposures.
BIS published the September issue of the Quarterly Review, which contains special features that analyze the rapid rise in equity funding for financial technology firms, the effectiveness of policy measures in response to pandemic, and the evolution of international banking.
The Basel Committee for Banking Supervision (BCBS) met in September 2021 and reviewed climate-related financial risks, discussed impact of digitalization, and welcomed efforts by the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) Foundation to develop a common set of sustainability reporting standards
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) issued a Cease and Desist Order against MUFG Union Bank for deficiencies in technology and operational risk governance.