FSI published a brief that examines the operational resilience initiatives of financial-sector authorities, in response to the COVID-19 outbreak. The brief focuses on examples of business continuity guidance issued by authorities in response to COVID-19, including updates to the existing guidance and the incorporation of pandemic scenarios into testing operational resilience. The brief emphasizes that pandemics may have unique elements that financial institutions need to incorporate in the scenarios to test their operational resilience.
Supervisory discussions at the international level have recently shifted toward achieving operational resilience more broadly. BoE is the first national authority to have issued a consultation on its operational resilience expectations. BoE defines operational resilience as the ability of firms and the financial sector to prevent, adapt, respond to, recover from, and learn from operational disruptions. The objective of addressing operational resilience of financial institutions to IT outages and cyber attacks has clearly motivated the BoE consultation as well as the international supervisory discussions. However, as seen in the disruption that COVID-19 outbreak has caused in recent weeks, financial institutions need to review and ensure that their operational resilience procedures are also fit for purpose during pandemics.
As shown by the recent spate of supervisory guidance in relation to the COVID-19 outbreak, pandemics may have unique elements that financial institutions need to incorporate in the scenarios to test their operational resilience. International efforts to come up with operational resilience standards should take into account these unique elements, including the following:
- Critical or essential employees—It is important to identify the critical functions and employees who support important business services as well as to ensure employee safety. Financial institutions should ensure that employees can safely resume their duties (remotely, if necessary) so that business services can recover as quickly as possible.
- IT infrastructure—Financial institutions should ensure that their IT infrastructure can support a sharp increase in usage and take steps to safeguard information security.
- Third-party service providers—Financial institutions should ensure that their external service providers and/or critical suppliers are taking adequate measures and are sufficiently prepared for a scenario in which there will be heavy reliance on their services.
- Cyber resilience—Financial institutions’ cyber resilience processes should remain vigilant to identify and protect vulnerable systems. These processes should be able to detect and respond to cyber attacks and help an institution recover from them.
Keywords: International, Banking, Insurance, Securities, COVID-19, Business Continuity, Operational Risk, Cyber Risk, Third-Party Arrangements, Operational Resilience, BoE, BIS, FSI
Leading economist; commercial real estate; performance forecasting, econometric infrastructure; data modeling; credit risk modeling; portfolio assessment; custom commercial real estate analysis; thought leader.
The European Commission (EC) published the Delegated Regulation 2021/1527 with regard to the regulatory technical standards for the contractual recognition of write down and conversion powers.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published a new set of frequently asked questions (FAQs) to provide guidance to authorized deposit-taking institutions on the interpretation of APS 120, the prudential standard on securitization.
The Single Resolution Board (SRB) published a Communication on the application of regulatory technical standard provisions on prior permission for reducing eligible liabilities instruments as of January 01, 2022.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published a new set of frequently asked questions (FAQs) to clarify the regulatory capital treatment of investments in the overseas deposit-taking and insurance subsidiaries.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final report on the guidelines specifying the criteria to assess the exceptional cases when institutions exceed the large exposure limits and the time and measures needed for institutions to return to compliance.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) issued the policy statement PS20/21, which contains final rules for the application of existing consolidated prudential requirements to financial holding companies and mixed financial holding companies.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) revised the guidelines on stress tests to be conducted by the national deposit guarantee schemes under the Deposit Guarantee Schemes Directive (DGSD).
The European Commission (EC) announced that Nordea Bank has signed a guarantee agreement with the European Investment Bank (EIB) Group to support the sustainable transformation of businesses in the Nordics.
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) issued a circular, for all authorized institutions, to confirm its support of an information note that sets out various options available in the loan market for replacing USD LIBOR with the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR).
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) issued a new "Problem Bank Supervision" booklet of the Comptroller's Handbook. The booklet covers information on timely identification and rehabilitation of problem banks and their advanced supervision, enforcement, and resolution when conditions warrant.