RBNZ is consulting on the capital adequacy framework for banks and the consultation was initially expected to end on May 03, 2019, although the consultation period has been extended to May 17, 2019. This is the fourth public consultation opportunity in the ongoing review of bank capital adequacy. The proposals are intended to increase the capital requirements for banks to make bank failures less likely.
RBNZ is consulting on the following proposals:
- Limit the extent to which capital requirements differ between the internal ratings-based (IRB) approach and the standardized approach, by recalibrating the IRB approach and applying a floor linked to the Standardized outcomes. This reflects one of the principles of the Capital Review: where there are multiple methods for determining capital requirements, outcomes should not vary unduly between methods. In essence, there should be as level a playing field as possible, both between IRB banks and between IRB and Standardized banks.
- Raise risk-weighted assets (RWA) for the four IRB-accredited banks to approximately 90% of what would be calculated under the standardized approach.
- Set a tier 1 capital requirement (consisting of a minimum requirement of 6% and prudential capital buffer of 9%-10%) equal to 16% of RWA for banks that are deemed systemically important and 15% for all other banks.
- Assign 1.5 percentage points of the proposed prudential capital buffer requirements to a countercyclical component, which could be temporarily reduced to 0% during periods of exceptional stress.
- Assign 1 percentage point of the proposed prudential capital buffer requirement to domestic systemically important bank (D-SIB) buffer, to be applied to banks deemed to be systemically important.
- Retain the current tier 2 capital treatment, but raise the question of whether tier 2 should remain in the capital framework.
- Implement a staged transition of the different components of the revised framework over the coming years.
The expected effect on banks’ capital is an increase of between 20% and 60%. This represents about 70% of the banking sector’s expected profits over the five-year transition period. RBNZ expects only a minor impact on borrowing rates for customers. In the consultation paper, RBNZ also outlined the risk appetite framework used to arrive at the proposed capital requirements. This framework incorporates a specific, two-part policy goal. This includes ensuring that the banking system has the confidence of depositors and other creditors, even when subject to extreme shocks (delivering soundness), and having identified the level of capital needed to achieve soundness and enhance soundness if it can be done without any adverse impact on expected output (delivering efficiency). Submissions will be made public after the consultation closes. Final decision is expected to be communicated in the third quarter of 2019.
- Notification on Extension of Consultation
- Notification on Consultation
- Consultation Paper (PDF)
- Additional Information on Consultation
Comment Due Date: May 17, 2019
Keywords: Asia Pacific, New Zealand, Banking, Capital Adequacy Framework, IRB Approach, Standardized Approach, Regulatory Capital, Basel III, RBNZ
Previous ArticleBIS Publishes Report on Monitoring of Fast-Paced Electronic Markets
APRA issued a letter on the loss-absorbing capacity (LAC) requirements for domestic systemically important banks (D-SIBs) and published a discussion paper, along with the proposed the prudential standards on financial contingency planning (CPS 190) and resolution planning (CPS 900).
The European Commission (EC) launched a call for evidence, until March 18, 2022, as part of a comprehensive review of the macro-prudential rules for the banking sector under the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR) and Directive (CRD IV).
The Financial Stability Board (FSB) published a report that sets out good practices for crisis management groups.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) found that Heritage Bank Limited had incorrectly reported capital because of weaknesses in operational risk and compliance frameworks, although the bank did not breach minimum prudential capital ratios at any point and remains well-capitalized.
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) released the annual report for 2020-2021.
Through a letter addressed to the banking sector entities, the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) announced deferral of the domestic implementation of the final Basel III reforms from the first to the second quarter of 2023.
EIOPA recently published a letter in which EC is informing the European Parliament and Council that it could not adopt the set of draft regulatory technical standards for disclosures under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) within the stipulated three-month period, given their length and technical detail.
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) published the third in a series of policy statements that set out rules to introduce the UK Investment Firm Prudential Regime (IFPR), which will take effect on January 01, 2022.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published, along with a summary of its response to the consultation feedback, an information paper that summarizes the finalized capital framework that is in line with the internationally agreed Basel III requirements for banks.
The Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) issued a consultative report focusing on access to central counterparty (CCP) clearing and client-position portability.