OSFI launched a consultation to explore ways to enhance the OSFI assurance over capital, leverage, and liquidity returns for banks and insurers, given the increasing complexity arising from the evolving regulatory reporting framework due to IFRS 17 (Insurance Contracts) standard and Basel III reforms. The aim is to engage stakeholders, including the federally regulated financial institutions, in a dialog with OSFI, to proactively enhance and align assurance expectations over key regulatory returns that contribute to the OSFI assessment of the safety and soundness of institutions. The comment period for this consultation ends on June 18, 2021, with a draft guideline expected to be published for consultation by Fall 2021. OSFI is proposing for the enhanced assurance expectations be effective by fiscal 2023 for deposit-taking institutions and by fiscal 2022 for federally regulated insurers.
At present, OSFI has a range of assurance expectations for capital, leverage, and liquidity returns. For deposit-taking institutions using the internal ratings-based approach for credit risk, senior management submits an annual attestation for compliance with minimum regulatory requirements for regulatory capital models and an internal audit opinion is submitted for approved regulatory capital models. For deposit-takers using the standardized approach for credit risk, the internal audit function also performs a periodic review of the Basel Capital Adequacy Return (BCAR) that is submitted to the Lead Supervisors of OSFI. OSFI now also proposes to have the assurance expectations apply to the capital, leverage and liquidity returns of all federally regulated deposit-taking institutions.
The regulatory returns in scope for domestic systemically important banks (D-SIBs) and small and medium-size deposit-taking institutions (SMSBs) include the BCAR, Leverage Requirements Return (LRR), and liquidity returns for the Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR), Net Stable Funding Ratio (NSFR), Net Cumulative Cash Flow (NCCF), and the Operating Cash Flow Statement (OCFS). Consistent with the proposed SMSBs’ Capital and Liquidity Requirements, the assurance expectations for SMSBs do not apply to foreign bank branches. The associated guidelines include the Capital Adequacy Requirements (CAR), Leverage Requirements (LR), Total Loss Absorbing Capacity (TLAC), and Liquidity Adequacy Requirements (LAR). The OSFI initiative to advance proportionality in the capital and liquidity regime for SMSBs includes proposed changes to the SMSB Pillar 1 capital and liquidity frameworks. Therefore, OSFI is proposing that the assurance expectations complement the proportionality initiative to reflect the size, nature, complexity, and business activities of SMSBs.
Moreover, certain external audit requirements exist in most insurance guidelines but not in the CAR, LR, TLAC, and LAR guidelines for federally regulated deposit-taking institutions; however, senior management submits an annual attestation for compliance with minimum regulatory requirements for regulatory capital models and internal audit performs a periodic review of the BCAR. Therefore, OSFI proposes to better align external audit requirements between the insurance and deposit-taking industries. OSFI also proposes to require an annual internal audit opinion on the accuracy and completeness of key regulatory returns, which includes a conclusion on the effectiveness of internal controls. The internal audit may be completed at any time during the fiscal year. The proposals in this area aim to reduce misstatements on the regulatory returns by relying on the third line of defense to enhance governance and controls.
Comment Due Date: June 18, 2021
Keywords: Americas, Canada, Banking, Basel III, Internal Audit, Materiality, Reporting, Proportionality, Internal Control, External Audit, Compliance Risk, Regulatory Capital, Liquidity Risk, Leverage Ratio, OSFI
EC published the Implementing Regulation 2021/763 that lays down implementing technical standards for supervisory reporting and public disclosure of the minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities (MREL).
EBA published a report that examines the convergence of prudential supervisory practices in 2020 and offers conclusions of the EBA college monitoring activity.
APRA announced the standardization of quarterly reporting due dates for authorized deposit-taking institutions.
The private sector working group of ECB on euro risk-free rates published the recommendations to address events that would trigger fallbacks in the Euro Interbank Offered Rate (EURIBOR)-related contracts, along with the €STR-based EURIBOR fallback rates (rates that could be used if a fallback is triggered).
Bundesbank published a list of "EntryPoints" that are accepted in its reporting system; the list provides taxonomy version and name of the module against each EntryPoint.
EBA published the phase 1 of its reporting framework 3.1, with the technical package covering the new reporting requirements for investment firms (under the implementing technical standards on investment firms reporting).
The Sustainable Finance Taskforce of IOSCO held two roundtables, with global stakeholders, on the IOSCO priorities to enhance the reliability, comparability, and consistency of sustainability-related disclosures and to collect views on the practical implementation of a global system architecture for these disclosures.
Asia Pacific Australia Banking APS 111 Capital Adequacy Regulatory Capital Basel RBNZ APRA
ESMA published the final guidelines on outsourcing to cloud service providers.
EBA published annual data for two key concepts and indicators in the Deposit Guarantee Schemes (DGS) Directive—available financial means and covered deposits.