OSFI launched a consultation to explore ways to enhance the OSFI assurance over capital, leverage, and liquidity returns for banks and insurers, given the increasing complexity arising from the evolving regulatory reporting framework due to IFRS 17 (Insurance Contracts) standard and Basel III reforms. The aim is to engage stakeholders, including the federally regulated financial institutions, in a dialog with OSFI, to proactively enhance and align assurance expectations over key regulatory returns that contribute to the OSFI assessment of the safety and soundness of institutions. The comment period for this consultation ends on June 18, 2021, with a draft guideline expected to be published for consultation by Fall 2021. OSFI is proposing for the enhanced assurance expectations be effective by fiscal 2023 for deposit-taking institutions and by fiscal 2022 for federally regulated insurers.
At present, OSFI has a range of assurance expectations for capital, leverage, and liquidity returns. For deposit-taking institutions using the internal ratings-based approach for credit risk, senior management submits an annual attestation for compliance with minimum regulatory requirements for regulatory capital models and an internal audit opinion is submitted for approved regulatory capital models. For deposit-takers using the standardized approach for credit risk, the internal audit function also performs a periodic review of the Basel Capital Adequacy Return (BCAR) that is submitted to the Lead Supervisors of OSFI. OSFI now also proposes to have the assurance expectations apply to the capital, leverage and liquidity returns of all federally regulated deposit-taking institutions.
The regulatory returns in scope for domestic systemically important banks (D-SIBs) and small and medium-size deposit-taking institutions (SMSBs) include the BCAR, Leverage Requirements Return (LRR), and liquidity returns for the Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR), Net Stable Funding Ratio (NSFR), Net Cumulative Cash Flow (NCCF), and the Operating Cash Flow Statement (OCFS). Consistent with the proposed SMSBs’ Capital and Liquidity Requirements, the assurance expectations for SMSBs do not apply to foreign bank branches. The associated guidelines include the Capital Adequacy Requirements (CAR), Leverage Requirements (LR), Total Loss Absorbing Capacity (TLAC), and Liquidity Adequacy Requirements (LAR). The OSFI initiative to advance proportionality in the capital and liquidity regime for SMSBs includes proposed changes to the SMSB Pillar 1 capital and liquidity frameworks. Therefore, OSFI is proposing that the assurance expectations complement the proportionality initiative to reflect the size, nature, complexity, and business activities of SMSBs.
Moreover, certain external audit requirements exist in most insurance guidelines but not in the CAR, LR, TLAC, and LAR guidelines for federally regulated deposit-taking institutions; however, senior management submits an annual attestation for compliance with minimum regulatory requirements for regulatory capital models and internal audit performs a periodic review of the BCAR. Therefore, OSFI proposes to better align external audit requirements between the insurance and deposit-taking industries. OSFI also proposes to require an annual internal audit opinion on the accuracy and completeness of key regulatory returns, which includes a conclusion on the effectiveness of internal controls. The internal audit may be completed at any time during the fiscal year. The proposals in this area aim to reduce misstatements on the regulatory returns by relying on the third line of defense to enhance governance and controls.
Comment Due Date: June 18, 2021
Keywords: Americas, Canada, Banking, Basel III, Internal Audit, Materiality, Reporting, Proportionality, Internal Control, External Audit, Compliance Risk, Regulatory Capital, Liquidity Risk, Leverage Ratio, OSFI
Previous ArticleOSFI Consults on Minimum Qualifying Rate for Uninsured Mortgages
In a letter addressed to the industry, the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) set out an updated schedule of policy priorities for the banking, insurance, and superannuation industries.
The European Commission (EC) adopted a comprehensive review package of Solvency II rules in the European Union.
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) issued Versions 1.0 of the "Earnings" and "Regulatory Reporting" booklets of the Comptroller's Handbook.
The European Central Bank (ECB) published results of its economy-wide climate stress test, which aimed to assess the resilience of non-financial corporates and euro area banks to climate risks.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published a report on the use of digital platforms in the banking and payments sector in European Union.
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) published updates on the policy measures that were announced in context of the ongoing pandemic.
The International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA), along with several other associations, submitted a joint response to the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) consultation on preliminary proposals for the prudential treatment of cryptoasset exposures.
BIS published the September issue of the Quarterly Review, which contains special features that analyze the rapid rise in equity funding for financial technology firms, the effectiveness of policy measures in response to pandemic, and the evolution of international banking.
The Basel Committee for Banking Supervision (BCBS) met in September 2021 and reviewed climate-related financial risks, discussed impact of digitalization, and welcomed efforts by the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) Foundation to develop a common set of sustainability reporting standards
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) issued a Cease and Desist Order against MUFG Union Bank for deficiencies in technology and operational risk governance.