EIOPA Study Examines Internal Model Market and Credit Risks Under SII
EIOPA published a report presenting the results of its yearly study on the internal modeling of market and credit risks under the Solvency II Directive, also known as SII. This year's study includes new elements in the form of sustainability considerations, analysis of dependency structures, and effects of COVID-19 crisis on the modeling of market and credit risks. The overall results continue to show significant variations in asset model outputs, which could be partly attributable to model and business specificities already known by the relevant national competent authorities, but also indicate a certain need for further supervisory scrutiny.
The report summarizes key findings from the market and credit risk comparative study, or MCRCS, undertaken in 2020 based on year-end 2019 data and provides an insight into the supervisory initiatives being taken following the conclusions of this study. Market and credit risks contribute significantly to the solvency capital requirement of insurance undertakings and are of material importance for the majority of internal model undertakings. The 21 participants from 8 different member states cover nearly 100% of the EUR investments held by all undertakings with an approved internal model covering market and credit risks in the European Economic Area (excluding UK). The study based on simplified asset-liability-portfolios also puts focus on the analysis of interest rate "down" movements, more relevant for liabilities. Furthermore, to achieve a more holistic picture, effects from the undertakings’ approach to the volatility adjustment (VA) are taken into account in the analysis of the portfolios. The study results, tools, and experience will be feeding into the Supervisory Review Process on internal models and vice versa.
The results of the analysis show that credit risk charges for sovereign bonds across groups of modeling approaches show relatively low variation for bonds issued by Germany, Netherlands, Austria, Belgium, and France. The variation is greater for the bonds issued by Ireland, Portugal Spain, and Italy. These results are influenced by firms which show zero or low credit risk shocks across the instruments. Additionally, credit risk charges for corporate bonds are generally higher for bonds with lower credit ratings and the variation increases materially with worsening credit quality. The variation becomes substantial for BB-rated bonds. This demonstrates the variety of modeling assumptions being made by firms, particularly for low-rated bonds. With respect to equity risk, undertakings show less variation in the risk charges for major equity indices compared to risk charges applied to the strategic equity participations. Risk charges applied to the five real estate benchmark investments vary to a larger extent compared to equity. Additionally, for the real estate category, model calibrations tend to emphasize more the risk profile of the undertakings’ actual investment portfolio and less on publicly available indices.
Related Links
Keywords: Europe, EU, Insurance, Market Study, Credit Risk, Solvency II, Supervisory Review Process, COVID-19, SCR, Internal Controls, Solvency Capital Requirements, EIOPA
Featured Experts
Adam Koursaris
Asset and liability management expert; capable modeler; risk and capital specialist
Victor Calanog, Ph.D.
Leading economist; commercial real estate; performance forecasting, econometric infrastructure; data modeling; credit risk modeling; portfolio assessment; custom commercial real estate analysis; thought leader.
Cassandra Hannibal
Life insurance actuary; risk management and economic capital specialist
Previous Article
EC Agrees to Prolong Scheme to Support NPL Reduction at Greek BanksRelated Articles
EC Regulation Sets Out Standards for Reporting and Disclosure of MREL
EC published the Implementing Regulation 2021/763 that lays down implementing technical standards for supervisory reporting and public disclosure of the minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities (MREL).
EBA Report Notes Loan Origination Should Remain in Supervisory Focus
EBA published a report that examines the convergence of prudential supervisory practices in 2020 and offers conclusions of the EBA college monitoring activity.
APRA Decides to Standardize Submission Date for Quarterly Reporting
APRA announced the standardization of quarterly reporting due dates for authorized deposit-taking institutions.
ECB Working Group Publishes Recommendations on EURIBOR Fallbacks
The private sector working group of ECB on euro risk-free rates published the recommendations to address events that would trigger fallbacks in the Euro Interbank Offered Rate (EURIBOR)-related contracts, along with the €STR-based EURIBOR fallback rates (rates that could be used if a fallback is triggered).
Bundesbank Publishes Supporting Documentation for Reporting by Banks
Bundesbank published a list of "EntryPoints" that are accepted in its reporting system; the list provides taxonomy version and name of the module against each EntryPoint.
EBA Publishes Phase 1 of Reporting Framework 3.1
EBA published the phase 1 of its reporting framework 3.1, with the technical package covering the new reporting requirements for investment firms (under the implementing technical standards on investment firms reporting).
IOSCO Sees Support for Mandatory Sustainability Reporting
The Sustainable Finance Taskforce of IOSCO held two roundtables, with global stakeholders, on the IOSCO priorities to enhance the reliability, comparability, and consistency of sustainability-related disclosures and to collect views on the practical implementation of a global system architecture for these disclosures.
APRA to Finalize Capital Adequacy Standard Revisions by January 2022
Asia Pacific Australia Banking APS 111 Capital Adequacy Regulatory Capital Basel RBNZ APRA
ESMA Issues Guidelines on Outsourcing to Cloud Service Providers
ESMA published the final guidelines on outsourcing to cloud service providers.
EBA Publishes Data on Deposit Guarantee Schemes
EBA published annual data for two key concepts and indicators in the Deposit Guarantee Schemes (DGS) Directive—available financial means and covered deposits.
