HKMA Decides to Lower Regulatory Reserve Requirement for Banks by 50%
HKMA has decided to lower the regulatory reserve requirement on locally incorporated authorized institutions by 50%, with immediate effect. HKMA has found that the need for locally incorporated authorized institutions to maintain a regulatory reserve on top of accounting provisions has diminished. Thus, HKMA has decided to lower the regulatory reserve requirement for authorized institutions to provide authorized institutions with a greater lending headroom to support customers to cope with the COVID-19 outbreak. The mechanism for determining the level of regulatory reserve reduction for individual authorized institutions and the consequential adjustment to the target rate for the calculation of the benchmark regulatory provision is set out in the Annex to the recent HKMA circular.
At the time of implementation of Hong Kong Financial Reporting Standard (HKFRS) 9 in January 2018, HKMA considered it prudent to continue requiring locally incorporated authorized institutions to maintain a regulatory reserve on top of accounting provisions. This decision was made taking into consideration that potential gaps might exist, at least initially, regarding the data, systems and controls required in determining expected credit loss provisions under HKFRS 9.
With HKFRS 9 having been implemented for more than two years, HKMA observes that locally incorporated authorized institutions have made good progress in enhancing their expected loss provisioning models, systems, and controls. The locally incorporated authorized institutions reported notable increases in their accounting provisions for the second half of 2019, given the deterioration in the economic environment. This indicates that the “expected loss” provisioning requirement under HKFRS 9 is robust and responsive to changes in external conditions. Accordingly, the need for locally incorporated authorized institutions to maintain a regulatory reserve on top of accounting provisions has diminished.
HKMA expects that the regulatory reserve release should not be used for dividend distribution, share buyback, or payment of bonus to senior management. HKMA will keep the situation under regular review and will continue to assess the implementation of HKFRS 9 by locally incorporated authorized institutions to see if any further adjustment to the regulatory reserve requirement is warranted in the future.
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Hong Kong, Banking, Accounting, COVID-19, HKFRS 9, ECL, Regulatory Capital, IFRS 9, HKMA
Featured Experts

María Cañamero
Skilled market researcher; growth strategist; successful go-to-market campaign developer

Nicolas Degruson
Works with financial institutions, regulatory experts, business analysts, product managers, and software engineers to drive regulatory solutions across the globe.

Metin Epözdemir
Metin Epözdemir helps European and African banks with design and implementation of credit risk, stress testing, capital management, and credit loss accounting solutions.
Related Articles
BIS Report Notes Existing Gaps in Climate Risk Data at Central Banks
A Consultative Group on Risk Management (CGRM) at the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) published a report that examines incorporation of climate risks into the international reserve management framework.
EBA Publishes Multiple Regulatory Updates for Regulated Entities
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final guidelines on liquidity requirements exemption for investment firms, updated version of its 5.2 filing rules document for supervisory reporting, and Single Rulebook Question and Answer (Q&A) updates in July 2022.
APRA Consults on Prudential Standard for Operational Risk
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) is seeking comments, until October 21, 2022, on the introduction of CPS 230, which is the new cross-industry prudential standard on operational risk management.
EC Amends Rule on Securitizations; ESRB Updates Reciprocation Measures
The European Commission published a Delegated Regulation 2022/1301 on the information to be provided in accordance with the simple, transparent, and standardized (STS) notification requirements for on-balance-sheet synthetic securitizations.
APRA Announces Revisions to Capital Framework for Banks
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) is announced revisions to the capital framework for authorized deposit-taking institutions to implement the "unquestionably strong" capital ratios and the Basel III reforms.
EBA Examines Remuneration Data and Use of Large Exposure Exemptions
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published a report that examines the use of certain exemptions included in the large exposures regime under the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).
UK Authorities Publish Discussion Paper on Critical Third Parties
The Bank of England (BoE), the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA), and the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) published a joint discussion paper that sets out potential measures to oversee and strengthen the resilience of services provided by critical third parties to the financial sector in UK.
BoE Issues Update on Ongoing Data Transformation Program
The Bank of England (BoE) issued a communication to firms to provide an update on the progress of the joint data transformation program—which is being led by BoE, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), and the industry—for the financial sector in UK.
EBA Issues Draft Methodology and Templates for 2023 Stress Tests
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published the draft methodology, templates, and template guidance for the European Union-wide stress test in 2023.
EBA Issues SREP Guidelines and Standards for Investment Firms
The European Banking Authority (EBA) and the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) jointly published the final guidelines on common procedures and methodologies for the supervisory review and evaluation process (SREP) for investment firms.